Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to TSI Andre
Re: Working Hard for U! Personally I favor 16:10, as I find 16:9 too cramped for what I most frequently do (scroll down a page of text). Our accounting software at work is a PITA when used on a 16:9 screen, unless you have a pretty big one.
Sadly, very few monitors support 16:10 these days  |
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17 | 16:9 is stupid for computer monitors, unless its a relatively large one like RMerlin mentioned...
I love my Dell 30" 2560x1600 16:10 monitor. |
|
DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6 | said by HiVolt:16:9 is stupid for computer monitors, unless its a relatively large one like RMerlin mentioned...
I love my Dell 30" 2560x1600 16:10 monitor.
WHAT ?
Compromise ?!   |
|
grunze510
join:2009-02-14
Cote Saint-Luc, QC
kudos:1 | I don't mind 16:9 or 16:10. As long as the vertical resolution is more than 800 pixels, it's usually fine. It doesn't matter if it's 4:3, 16:9, or 16:10, it probably won't make much of a difference if the height of the display is cramped. But to each his own.
But with that being said, sometimes a 4:3 display can make things awkward as hell to use. »youtu.be/P-cYQ1ShUW0 |
|
|
|
