dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
share rss forum feed


RMerlin

join:2009-10-09
Montreal, QC
reply to TSI Andre

Re: Working Hard for U!

Personally I favor 16:10, as I find 16:9 too cramped for what I most frequently do (scroll down a page of text). Our accounting software at work is a PITA when used on a 16:9 screen, unless you have a pretty big one.

Sadly, very few monitors support 16:10 these days



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:21

16:9 is stupid for computer monitors, unless its a relatively large one like RMerlin mentioned...

I love my Dell 30" 2560x1600 16:10 monitor.



Davesnothere
No-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
Premium
join:2009-06-15
START Today!
kudos:7

said by HiVolt:

16:9 is stupid for computer monitors, unless its a relatively large one like RMerlin mentioned...

I love my Dell 30" 2560x1600 16:10 monitor.

 
WHAT ?

Compromise ?!

grunze510

join:2009-02-14
Cote Saint-Luc, QC
kudos:1

I don't mind 16:9 or 16:10. As long as the vertical resolution is more than 800 pixels, it's usually fine. It doesn't matter if it's 4:3, 16:9, or 16:10, it probably won't make much of a difference if the height of the display is cramped. But to each his own.

But with that being said, sometimes a 4:3 display can make things awkward as hell to use.

»youtu.be/P-cYQ1ShUW0