dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
share rss forum feed


dillyhammer
START me up
Premium,MVM
join:2010-01-09
Scarborough, ON
kudos:10
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·Start Communicat..
reply to Gone

Re: [Niagara] 40gb of "usage" while the modem is unplu

Something has to be done about this, sure as eggs is eggs.

People can argue until they're blue in the face about how data can't be regulated because it can't be accurately measured.

If that's truly the case, if it can't be accurately measured, then it should be billed for at all.

That is the spirit of Weights & Measures. What's their motto again?

Fair Measure for All

How about some of that.

In the Telecommunications Act

27. (1) Every rate charged by a Canadian carrier for a telecommunications service shall be just and reasonable.

How about some of that.

What part of the regulatory environment allows a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer.

In my world, that's fraud.

F. R. A. U. D.

Mike
--
Cogeco - The New UBB Devil -»[Burloak] Usage Based Billing Nightmare
Cogeco UBB, No Modem Required - »[Niagara] 40gb of "usage" while the modem is unplugged



urbanriot
Premium
join:2004-10-18
Canada
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Cogeco Cable

said by dillyhammer:

27. (1) Every rate charged by a Canadian carrier for a telecommunications service shall be just and reasonable.

How about some of that.

What part of the regulatory environment allows a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer.

How about that? Who decides what is just and reasonable. Presumably that's debated by those who moderate these acts and the carriers. If you don't feel it's just, start writing your letters. If plenty of people write letters to the appropriate people, that they're being treated unjustly, perhaps something can be done.

As far as allowing a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer, did the friend of a friend concerning this thread get a bill for something they didn't receive? Without proof these are simply "friend of a friend" stories... if you really want something to happen, you need to encourage people to post their stories with copies of their bills like the guy in that thread many months ago with the super large bill.


nitzguy
Premium
join:2002-07-11
Sudbury, ON

said by urbanriot:

said by dillyhammer:

27. (1) Every rate charged by a Canadian carrier for a telecommunications service shall be just and reasonable.

How about some of that.

What part of the regulatory environment allows a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer.

How about that? Who decides what is just and reasonable. Presumably that's debated by those who moderate these acts and the carriers. If you don't feel it's just, start writing your letters. If plenty of people write letters to the appropriate people, that they're being treated unjustly, perhaps something can be done.

As far as allowing a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer, did the friend of a friend concerning this thread get a bill for something they didn't receive? Without proof these are simply "friend of a friend" stories... if you really want something to happen, you need to encourage people to post their stories with copies of their bills like the guy in that thread many months ago with the super large bill.

Something doesn't seem right.....

In reality, if I'm a hacker and an "evil person" and I'm benefitting from this, I'm going to take it to the max...so to just use "40gb" in a month with a hacked modem doesn't sound right to me, if its me, and I know of a way to max it out, I'm gonna max it out and screw that other person to the $50 overage...not just go "Oh, I feel sorry and I'm only going to make them pay $15/month more"....that's just not how criminal elements work...you'd see Angelos and Angelos of usage....not just 40gb...

I feel like some people don't quite understand what they're getting themselves into, especially when you see the increased upload usage.

Example: World of Warcraft....if you haven't turned off the peer to peer functionality even after you've downloaded the patch, your computer is still going to serve uploads of data to other users who still need the patch so long as they've left their P2P on...

I'm sure most other MMOs like WOW are like this as companies would rather not pay for extra bandwidth.... So while you're looking to plug a potential hole or looking at it from that standpoint, I feel as though education about what programs are actually doing with your connection is important...and also to educate yourself on the options...

With start you'd still run into the same potential pitfalls...since its ALL on Cogeco's network, you could still clone that cable mac and go to town....

Anywho, something in this story just doesn't ring true.....I'm not saying that people don't clone macs, but if you were one of those people, you just wouldn't magically stop at 40GB...it just doesn't make sense....

diskdocx

join:2005-09-26
Burlington, ON

1 recommendation

said by nitzguy:

said by urbanriot:

said by dillyhammer:

27. (1) Every rate charged by a Canadian carrier for a telecommunications service shall be just and reasonable.

How about some of that.

What part of the regulatory environment allows a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer.

How about that? Who decides what is just and reasonable. Presumably that's debated by those who moderate these acts and the carriers. If you don't feel it's just, start writing your letters. If plenty of people write letters to the appropriate people, that they're being treated unjustly, perhaps something can be done.

As far as allowing a telecommunications company to bill a customer for something they did not give to the customer, did the friend of a friend concerning this thread get a bill for something they didn't receive? Without proof these are simply "friend of a friend" stories... if you really want something to happen, you need to encourage people to post their stories with copies of their bills like the guy in that thread many months ago with the super large bill.

Something doesn't seem right.....

In reality, if I'm a hacker and an "evil person" and I'm benefitting from this, I'm going to take it to the max...so to just use "40gb" in a month with a hacked modem doesn't sound right to me, if its me, and I know of a way to max it out, I'm gonna max it out and screw that other person to the $50 overage...not just go "Oh, I feel sorry and I'm only going to make them pay $15/month more"....that's just not how criminal elements work...you'd see Angelos and Angelos of usage....not just 40gb...

I feel like some people don't quite understand what they're getting themselves into, especially when you see the increased upload usage.

Example: World of Warcraft....if you haven't turned off the peer to peer functionality even after you've downloaded the patch, your computer is still going to serve uploads of data to other users who still need the patch so long as they've left their P2P on...

I'm sure most other MMOs like WOW are like this as companies would rather not pay for extra bandwidth.... So while you're looking to plug a potential hole or looking at it from that standpoint, I feel as though education about what programs are actually doing with your connection is important...and also to educate yourself on the options...

With start you'd still run into the same potential pitfalls...since its ALL on Cogeco's network, you could still clone that cable mac and go to town....

Anywho, something in this story just doesn't ring true.....I'm not saying that people don't clone macs, but if you were one of those people, you just wouldn't magically stop at 40GB...it just doesn't make sense....

Well, maybe. But think of it like hacking a bank account or stealing a credit/debit card. You could drain it of a million dollars, but that would set off red flags everywhere.

A few hundred here and there is much more likely to go unnoticed.

If you can clone a MAC, you can clone a number of MACs.

Perhaps better to run up a small number of gigs spread across a whole bunch of MACs than to blow the wad on one and get it shut down.

Just a thought.


dillyhammer
START me up
Premium,MVM
join:2010-01-09
Scarborough, ON
kudos:10
Reviews:
·WIND Mobile
·Start Communicat..

said by diskdocx:

Well, maybe. But think of it like hacking a bank account or stealing a credit/debit card. You could drain it of a million dollars, but that would set off red flags everywhere.

A few hundred here and there is much more likely to go unnoticed.

If you can clone a MAC, you can clone a number of MACs.

Perhaps better to run up a small number of gigs spread across a whole bunch of MACs than to blow the wad on one and get it shut down.

Just a thought.

Precisely. It's about doing it undetected for as long as possible. I try not to confuse a thief and a hacker - two completely different animals.

Mike
--
Cogeco - The New UBB Devil -»[Burloak] Usage Based Billing Nightmare
Cogeco UBB, No Modem Required - »[Niagara] 40gb of "usage" while the modem is unplugged


Davesnothere
No-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
Premium
join:2009-06-15
START Today!
kudos:7

1 edit
reply to nitzguy

said by nitzguy:

Something doesn't seem right.....

In reality, if I'm a hacker and an "evil person" and I'm benefitting from this, I'm going to take it to the max...so to just use "40gb" in a month with a hacked modem doesn't sound right to me, if its me, and I know of a way to max it out, I'm gonna max it out and screw that other person to the $50 overage...not just go "Oh, I feel sorry and I'm only going to make them pay $15/month more"....that's just not how criminal elements work...you'd see Angelos and Angelos of usage....not just 40gb....

...Anywho, something in this story just doesn't ring true.....I'm not saying that people don't clone macs, but if you were one of those people, you just wouldn't magically stop at 40GB...it just doesn't make sense....

 
If this 'MAC Clowning' is as easy to do as some say, then why use so much per subscriber that it leaves ZERO DOUBT as to what is going on ?

Stopping at 40GB or some moderate amount is just enough to cause dissent between the provider and some of their subscribers (and some customers will not even notice, just paying up blindly), but not enough for all parties to agree that something serious (nor what exactly) is wrong.

EDIT : As I read further, I see that the next 2 posters have made a similar point to mine.

--

We have only 2 things about which to worry :
(1) That things may never get back to normal
(2) That they already HAVE !
-
START Forum »Start Communications
Or you can still use Canadian Broadband.


resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10
reply to nitzguy

said by nitzguy:

Example: World of Warcraft....if you haven't turned off the peer to peer functionality even after you've downloaded the patch, your computer is still going to serve uploads of data to other users who still need the patch so long as they've left their P2P on...

Actually, Wow only uses P2P during the patch process. Once you're done patching, all repairs are done via direct download from a Blizzard server. Its possible an installation is highly corrupted and downloads quite a bit from servers to replace corruption, but it couldn't account for anything near 40GB, as the game itself is only 25GB... Unless the system itself is unstable (like the Dell XPS630i with the faulty motherboards)..
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP