Theme

Welcome · log in · join	food

Home

Reviews

Speed Test

	All Forums		Hot Topics		Gallery

Forums → O Canada! → Canadian →

Canadian Chat → Re: Canadian comes home from Guantanamo

uniqs
11

« "The Internet is shit everywhere" Kevin O'Leary • [Serious] Regressing Civil Liberty across different countries »

This is a sub-selection from Canadian comes home from Guantanamo

A Lurker that's Ms Lurker btw Premium Member join:2007-10-27 Wellington N	A Lurker to peterboro Premium Member 2012-Sep-30 5:56 pm to peterboro Re: Canadian comes home from Guantanamo said by peterboro: Fathers now excused. Mother's isolation is relevant how? We're supposed to feel sorry for her. Too bad she felt that she couldn't get decent medical treatment and social assistance for her injured son, except in Canada. She's stated publically more than once that she would be happy if they all died martyrs. We should pity her, sending her 10 year old son off to be a child soldier. God forbid we hold her responsible. /sarcasm off
	actions · 2012-Sep-30 5:56 pm · (locked)
DKS Damn Kidney Stones join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON	DKS 2012-Sep-30 8:41 pm said by A Lurker: God forbid we hold her responsible. /sarcasm off And how would you propose we do that? She has broken no law.
	actions · 2012-Sep-30 8:41 pm · (locked)
Bob4 Account deleted join:2012-07-22 New Jersey	Bob4 Member 2012-Sep-30 8:44 pm said by DKS: said by A Lurker: God forbid we hold her responsible. /sarcasm off And how would you propose we do that? She has broken no law. How do you know that? You have access to all the classified information the US has?
	actions · 2012-Sep-30 8:44 pm · (locked)
DKS Damn Kidney Stones join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON	DKS 2012-Sep-30 8:52 pm said by Bob4: said by DKS: said by A Lurker: God forbid we hold her responsible. /sarcasm off And how would you propose we do that? She has broken no law. How do you know that? You have access to all the classified information the US has? One presumes that at this late date, she would have been charged. Absence of any charge speaks volumes.
	actions · 2012-Sep-30 8:52 pm · (locked)
Bob4 Account deleted join:2012-07-22 New Jersey	Bob4 Member 2012-Sep-30 8:54 pm said by DKS: One presumes that at this late date, she would have been charged. Absence of any charge speaks volumes. Ummm... No.
	actions · 2012-Sep-30 8:54 pm · (locked)
MaynardKrebs We did it. We heaved Steve. Yipee. Premium Member join:2009-06-17	MaynardKrebs to Bob4 Premium Member 2012-Sep-30 10:23 pm to Bob4 said by Bob4: said by DKS: said by A Lurker: God forbid we hold her responsible. /sarcasm off And how would you propose we do that? She has broken no law. How do you know that? You have access to all the classified information the US has? What 'classified information'? Do you mean the stuff with the same factual accuracy as got the US mired in Iraq and bled your Treasury dry?
	actions · 2012-Sep-30 10:23 pm · (locked)
DKS Damn Kidney Stones join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON	DKS to Bob4 2012-Oct-1 7:30 am to Bob4 said by Bob4: said by DKS: One presumes that at this late date, she would have been charged. Absence of any charge speaks volumes. Ummm... No. Perhaps not in the US. But in Canada... sans evidence, one can not be charged. Given that there appears to be no evidence of any crime, you point is absurd.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 7:30 am · (locked)
peterboro (banned) Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON	peterboro (banned) Member 2012-Oct-1 9:15 am said by DKS: Perhaps not in the US. But in Canada... sans evidence, one can not be charged. Ummm...No.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 9:15 am · (locked)
DKS Damn Kidney Stones join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON	DKS 2012-Oct-1 11:03 am said by peterboro: said by DKS: Perhaps not in the US. But in Canada... sans evidence, one can not be charged. Ummm...No. Charge may be laid, but no Crown would lay a charge unless there is reasonable prospect of conviction. Evidence is the key part of that equation.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 11:03 am · (locked)
peterboro (banned) Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON 1 recommendation	peterboro (banned) Member 2012-Oct-1 11:15 am said by DKS: said by peterboro: said by DKS: Perhaps not in the US. But in Canada... sans evidence, one can not be charged. Ummm...No. Charge may be laid, but no Crown would lay a charge unless there is reasonable prospect of conviction. Evidence is the key part of that equation. Ummm...No. First you said they cannot be charged when they can. Second the Crown makes the decision on whether to proceed based on the prospect of conviction. You often post on justice issues yet your knowledge in this area, and at the most basic level, is inaccurate.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 11:15 am · (locked)
DKS Damn Kidney Stones join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON	DKS 2012-Oct-1 3:24 pm said by peterboro: Ummm...No. First you said they cannot be charged when they can. Second the Crown makes the decision on whether to proceed based on the prospect of conviction. You often post on justice issues yet your knowledge in this area, and at the most basic level, is inaccurate. Thank you for your correction. You are a graduate of law school perhaps? A paralegal? Or like most of us, a reasonably informed person? I stand behind what I have said.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 3:24 pm · (locked)
peterboro (banned) Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON	peterboro (banned) Member 2012-Oct-1 3:35 pm said by DKS: said by peterboro: Ummm...No. First you said they cannot be charged when they can. Second the Crown makes the decision on whether to proceed based on the prospect of conviction. You often post on justice issues yet your knowledge in this area, and at the most basic level, is inaccurate. Thank you for your correction. You are a graduate of law school perhaps? A paralegal? Or like most of us, a reasonably informed person? I stand behind what I have said. You stand behind posting incorrect information? Good to know when it comes to justice issues. Police Foundations and 2yr college diploma as a paralegal btw.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 3:35 pm · (locked)
MaynardKrebs We did it. We heaved Steve. Yipee. Premium Member join:2009-06-17	MaynardKrebs Premium Member 2012-Oct-1 5:37 pm said by peterboro: Police Foundations ...... So would that include courses such as: Jackboot 101 - Ribs & Kidneys: So Easily Damaged Human Rights Violations for Dummies Sticking Together and Fabricating Evidence Pepper Spray is for Sissies How to Keep Your Mouth Shut When Being Investigated by the SIU? Just askin'
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 5:37 pm · (locked)
peterboro (banned) Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON	peterboro (banned) Member 2012-Oct-1 6:18 pm said by MaynardKrebs: said by peterboro: Police Foundations ...... So would that include courses such as: Jackboot 101 - Ribs & Kidneys: So Easily Damaged Human Rights Violations for Dummies Sticking Together and Fabricating Evidence Pepper Spray is for Sissies How to Keep Your Mouth Shut When Being Investigated by the SIU? Just askin' Nah, they just have us watch, »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tr ··· ning_Day
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 6:18 pm · (locked)
DKS Damn Kidney Stones join:2001-03-22 Owen Sound, ON	DKS to peterboro 2012-Oct-1 7:04 pm to peterboro said by peterboro: said by DKS: said by peterboro: Ummm...No. First you said they cannot be charged when they can. Second the Crown makes the decision on whether to proceed based on the prospect of conviction. You often post on justice issues yet your knowledge in this area, and at the most basic level, is inaccurate. Thank you for your correction. You are a graduate of law school perhaps? A paralegal? Or like most of us, a reasonably informed person? I stand behind what I have said. You stand behind posting incorrect information? Good to know when it comes to justice issues. Police Foundations and 2yr college diploma as a paralegal btw. Thank you. You have some cred. Please correct me when I post incorrect information. I look forward to your positive contributions. Perhaps you can correct what I said as a reasonably informed person.
	actions · 2012-Oct-1 7:04 pm · (locked)

Forums → O Canada! → Canadian → Canadian Chat	« "The Internet is shit everywhere" Kevin O'Leary • [Serious] Regressing Civil Liberty across different countries »
This is a sub-selection from Canadian comes home from Guantanamo