|reply to A Lurker |
Re: Boy in chains appears at door
said by A Lurker:
Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it.
This is a very scary thought indeed. The entire concept makes me want to vomit.
On the flip side; in theory we're getting to the point where such material will not require real actors at all. In theory the actors could be simulations. Which then changes the entire concept - since you've eliminated victims in the creation - should it be legal.
Boy I'd like to close that box I just opened.
A Lurkerthat's Ms Lurker btwPremium
said by CanadianRip:
On the flip side; in theory we're getting to the point where such material will not require real actors at all. In theory the actors could be simulations.
Agreed (although the concept is creepy). I would suspect that some just wouldn't get off on simulated actors, even if lifelike and realistic.
AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium
I think A lurker you hit the nail on Urbans head with your comment. Its the same with exploitation of women. Although there may be no result of you watching it in your home, the fact is many women are abused to feed the porn industry. Its a sick cycle. In the case of children they are exploited but not being adults puts them into a different category such that society is willing to go to greater lengths in their defence.......... such that even possessing the material is illegal.--
Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins".
Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla. Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"