<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers&#x27; in forum &#x27;PC gaming Tech&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27584992</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:31:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:31:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27636345</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnjunction posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1602955" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1602955');">Moos</a>:</said><p>My guess is Nvidia handpicked the chips that could sustain higher voltages and clocked them pretty high to get ahead of AMD in benchmarks and increase sales.  Explains the mass shortage of card availability.  There may be quite a few chips sold that don't have much OC'ing headroom, hence why they dont want them overclocked.  I have no facts to back that statement up whatsoever!   </p></div>My comment on this is that while chips can and usually are 'handpicked', known as binning, I don't know of a way to know which chips can sustain higher voltages other than cranking them up until they fail.  They can definitely apply the highest safe voltage and see which chips can run at the desired frequency though.  <br><br>They can also look at how many and which units they have to disable to get a certain frequency, then these parts are binned to lower model numbers with the same silicon but less units enabled.  (AMD caught alot of slack for doing this with their 3-core CPUs, but the GPU industry has been doing it for years and Intel even seems to be doing it recently (the sandy bridge-e chips have 8 cores on die but only up to 6 enabled).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27636345</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:05:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27636016</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kearnstd posted : I do not see this having a major impact on their sales,  I would imagine that even most home builders of computers do not alter their clock speeds any.<br><br>That said,  MSI is the blame here not Nvidia.  When an overclocker burns something out the majority of them know it was their own fault for pushing it too far.   However if a customer buys an MSI card that is way overvolted from the factory and the card fails,  I am guessing Nvidia fears the blame will be pushed onto them for the faulty chips and not MSI for the product as a whole.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27636016</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:06:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27606959</link>
<description><![CDATA[Moos posted : My guess is Nvidia handpicked the chips that could sustain higher voltages and clocked them pretty high to get ahead of AMD in benchmarks and increase sales.  Explains the mass shortage of card availability.  There may be quite a few chips sold that don't have much OC'ing headroom, hence why they dont want them overclocked.  I have no facts to back that statement up whatsoever!  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27606959</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:40:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27605557</link>
<description><![CDATA[C0deZer0 posted : No; this has more to do with MSI violating their agreement with NVIDIA and basically blocking voltage restrictor circuitry to feed way more voltage to the GPU than it was specced to receive. While this made thier <strong>Power Edition</strong> cards receive a much more aggressive factory overclock, it also created a situation wherein the chip was receiving power way beyond the specs, creating instability and even at best case, would mean for a significant shortening of how long the card would actually work.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://youtu.be/Cwn4R_GexLM">Because, f*ck Sony</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27605557</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:18:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27605544</link>
<description><![CDATA[Pollux7777 posted : I don't understand most of what you guys are talking about, too technical for my little brain.<br><br>I have an MSI GTX 660 (non-ti). I don't overclock, but I believe my particular model (Twin Frozr II) came overclocked out of the box.<br><br>Do I need to be concerned about something here?<br><small>--<br>Tawnka - 85 Tauren Warrior - Frostwolf<br>Brawnx - 85 Human Warrior - Hydraxis<br>Pollux - 85 Human Paladin Hydraxis</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27605544</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:15:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27605319</link>
<description><![CDATA[Moos posted : Interestingly enough, My Gigabyte Windforce 7950 just got a bios update which set's the default cores to 1000Mhz..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27605319</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:27:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27603680</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : MSI responds... doubling down on their stock OCs--but not dealing with the issue at hand.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by Tom's Hardware :</said><p><b><A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/msi-gpu-GTX-660-Ti-670-Power-Edition-Overvolting,18240.html#xtor=RSS-181">MSI Responds to GTX 660 Ti, 670 Power Edition Overvolting</A></b><br><br><i>MSI issues a new statement reaffirming its confidence in its video cards.</i><br><br>Last week, we brought news from our Tom's Hardware Germany team's discovery that MSI was overvolting the GPUs on the GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670 Ti Power Edition boards (Google Translate) to achieve a higher and longer lasting GPU boost state by basically circumventing the PWM controller.<br><br>MSI commented on our report with the following statement:<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>We are currently not aware of any other vendor providing this same level of performance and we&#146;ve worked with NVIDIA to ensure that new production models will limit this free overclock boost you currently get. Our new production models with normal GPU Boost function will be on sale next month.</p></div><A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/MSI-GTX-660-670-overvolting-PowerEdition,18013.html">Read our English news report of that here.</A><br><br>Following up, MSI <A HREF="http://www.msi.com/news-media/news/1482.html">issued a further statement on its website</A> with the following three points:<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>1. MSI respects the result which is tested by Tom's Hardware, but we have much confidence and believe our products would not cause any customer RMA concerns.<br><br>2. Since MSI designs these custom products with overclocking in mind, we "supercharge" these cards because we're anticipating enthusiast to overclock. Because of this design decision and the higher component quality, we're able to provide more power to the board resulting in higher and longer GPU Boost operation without reducing the lifetime of the graphics card or warranty term.<br><br>3. MSI's all graphics cards including GTX 670 and GTX 660 Ti passed strict test and stand behind our products with a 3 year warranty.</p></div></p></div><br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27603680</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 06:58:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27598250</link>
<description><![CDATA[FizzyMyNizzy posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/350435" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=350435');">DKS</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620434" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620434');">Krisnatharok</a>:</said><p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't all software modding utilities have built-in hard limits?<br> </p></div>1175 mV for the 680GTX. <br> </p></div>GTX 670 also. hard cap at 1175mv.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27598250</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 12:11:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27596044</link>
<description><![CDATA[Moos posted : True, only time will tell I guess.  Hopefully the use it as an opportunity to gain customers.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27596044</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 02:22:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27595367</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : I wouldn't say never--wait and see if AMD follows suit or uses it as an opportunity to earn customers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27595367</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:58:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27595259</link>
<description><![CDATA[C0deZer0 posted : It sounds to me like basically MSI deliberately went against the OEM-manufacturer agreement, and thus ruined it for everyone else :(<br><br>That said, between PhysX and the simple fact that ATI (now AMD) video had given me such a rotten experience, I'm really conflicted on this kind of heavy-handed response.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://youtu.be/Cwn4R_GexLM">Because, f*ck Sony</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27595259</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:24:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27595099</link>
<description><![CDATA[Moos posted : Sounds like they are taking the Apple approach.  More regulation and more control.  Sounds like everything else going on now days too.  begs the question, Who is John Galt!   Lol.  Anyway, Guess i'm never buying another Nvidia product.  Makes me feel that much better on the 7950 decision.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27595099</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:31:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27593066</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : More here:<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by Tom's Hardware :</said><p><b><A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-gpu-evga-green-light-approval,18150.html#xtor=RSS-181">Report: Nvidia to Give Green Light for Video Card Designs</A></b><br><br><strike>Intel</strike> Nvidia (sic) is reportedly cracking down on graphics card designs that do not meet the company's approval.<br><br>Apparently, Nvidia is enforcing its Green Light program, which requires graphics card makers to send in their designs for Nvidia's approval. The approval will not be given if certain noise, power, voltage and heat levels are not met. Without that approval, those cards cannot be sold. Bright Side of News said that EVGA was one of the first to feel Nvidia's whip and had to remove the EVBot voltage control tool from the EVGA GTX 680 Classified.<br><br>Of course, it's easy to chastise Nvidia for this type of control, which will not allow extreme graphics cards configurations anymore. However, Nvidia's brand and perception are exposed with every card that is sold and it is understandable that the company wants to make sure that it is represented in the way it wants. Extreme designs that go overboard are unlikely to meet the specifications of Nvidia's marketing promises and are likely to be shot down.<br><br>It's not exactly what the enthusiast's heart desires and it most certainly impacts the creativity of vendors, which will have an even tougher time to differentiate its parts from the competition. But if you argue from Nvidia's point of view, then - if the Green Light report is true - the company surely has a case.</p></div><br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27593066</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:21:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588304</link>
<description><![CDATA[Moos posted : I just OC'd my 7950 up to 1100mhz at 1175 mV last night with afterburner.  you just turn off the built in hard limit.  Not sure if their is an upper limit but it's not 1100mV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588304</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:14:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588162</link>
<description><![CDATA[DKS posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620434" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620434');">Krisnatharok</a>:</said><p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't all software modding utilities have built-in hard limits?<br> </p></div>1175 mV for the 680GTX. <br><small>--<br>Need-based health care not greed-based health care.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588162</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:34:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588161</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : Hence the OP. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588161</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:34:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588157</link>
<description><![CDATA[DKS posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620434" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620434');">Krisnatharok</a>:</said><p>Yup, with the software you are limited in how far you overvolt.  I believe the EVbot port on EVGA cards let you overvolt further via hardware.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.evga.com/articles/00521/" >www.evga.com/articles/00521/</A><br> </p></div>EVGA has removed any EVbot connections in their latest cards. <br><small>--<br>Need-based health care not greed-based health care.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588157</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:32:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588150</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't all software modding utilities have built-in hard limits?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588150</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:31:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588146</link>
<description><![CDATA[DKS posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1609984" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1609984');">Ghastlyone</a>:</said><p>The more and more I read, the happier I am that I never purchased one of these new 6 series cards.<br><br>No more voltage control? What the fuck are these people thinking? That's a complete deal beaker in my book. Period.<br> </p></div>Nonsense. You can still do software voltage control on the 600 series. At least you can with EVGA cards. But this explains <A HREF="http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=1755509" > this thread</A> on the EVGA forum. nVidia has banned voltmodding other than by software. If you want to curse anyone, curse MSI. <br><small>--<br>Need-based health care not greed-based health care.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27588146</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:31:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586735</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1523173" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1523173');">pnjunction</a>:</said><p>I can see where they are coming from.  As CMOS scales down the chips are going to be getting more and more sensitive to running beyond spec voltages.  As someone familiar with the technology at a low level the voltages that I hear about people applying make me cringe.  I have looked at reliability data for CMOS smaller than 65nm and it doesn't take much to reduce the lifetime from years to weeks.<br> </p></div>  You even see it with the Intel die shrink from 32nm to 22nm--Ivy Bridge CPUs don't OC as well as Sandy Bridge.<br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586735</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:20:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586732</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : Yup, with the software you are limited in how far you overvolt.  I believe the EVbot port on EVGA cards let you overvolt further via hardware.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.evga.com/articles/00521/" >www.evga.com/articles/00521/</A><br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586732</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:20:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586599</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ghastlyone posted : What I don't undstand is, out of both software programs I've used (MSI and EVGA Precision) I'm limited to going no further then 1.1v on the core voltage.<br><br>How the hell are you going to roast a GPU @ 1.1v? This isn't like a CPU where you're allowed an unlimited amount of overclocking ability and can definitely do some damage.<br><br>I can run my card all day long at 1.1v and it wouldn't flinch.<br><br>The majority of people roasting their cards are probably from running crappy cases, and excess dust build up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586599</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:48:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586547</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnjunction posted : I can see where they are coming from.  As CMOS scales down the chips are going to be getting more and more sensitive to running beyond spec voltages.  As someone familiar with the technology at a low level the voltages that I hear about people applying make me cringe.  I have looked at reliability data for CMOS smaller than 65nm and it doesn't take much to reduce the lifetime from years to weeks.<br><br>Still this is a bit heavy-handed.  A more balanced approach might be to attach a disclaimer that over-volting voids the warranty.  That has practical issues though like requiring some sort of detection mechanism, and will still probably get bad press from people who think they should be allowed to overvolt and still have a warranty (which, as someone who designs integrated circuits, is ridiculous).  In the short term I can see why they went with this, the detection for those who overvolt is that they will have to physically modify the card.  Perhaps there is a way that such modification could be easy built in to the design, but irreversible, on enthusiast cards?<br><br>That MSI story is interesting.  With the manufacturers in a pinch to differentiate themselves with 'stock' overclocks, I can understand the motivation to push it.  One could say that MSI is the one the hook for the warranty coverage and bad press, but I don't think nvidia can ignore that a bunch of cards dying either in warranty or out of warranty is not good for their reputation either.  <br><br>Most people are not going to seek out let alone understand the root cause of a product failure.  I think back to the failure of so many GeForce 8400M/8600M mobile chips (they were basically all ticking time bombs).  While nVidia was squarely to blame there, laptop manufacturers shouldered alot of the blame in the minds of consumers.  I couldn't help but laugh when someone talked about how HP/Asus/Dell/Apple was junk because it died right right out of warranty, and how they were buying Apple/HP/Asus/Dell instead this time even though they all had the same problems with those chips.   (I call this the 'failure roulette' where people switch companies even though the chance of failure is roughly the same).  On the same note people with dead MSI overvolted cards could swear off nVidia and switch to AMD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27586547</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:38:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585799</link>
<description><![CDATA[El Quintron posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/901168" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=901168');">Chuck_IV</a>:</said><p>This is the kind of thing that will make a LOT of people reconsider buying NVidia the next time around(I know I will reconsider the next time). This will hurt them going forward.<br> </p></div>I just bought a GTX670, so I'm out of the market for a year or two... that being said, I'm resenting Nvidia for a lot of the same reasons I resent Microsoft, Apple and most Cell phone manufacturers... ...as in once I buy this it's mine to do with as I please. I don't get why computer hardware manufacturers are so pig-headed about this.<br><br>My only reason for going with Nvidia, was that they had better support for Linux, now that Steam is launching on Linux, it will most definitely bring in better Linux drivers on the ATI front, and I'll most likely be crossing the floor next time around.<br><br>What a load.<br><small>--<br>Support Bacteria -- It's the Only Culture Some People Have</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585799</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:59:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585339</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chuck_IV posted : This is the kind of thing that will make a LOT of people reconsider buying NVidia the next time around(I know I will reconsider the next time). This will hurt them going forward.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585339</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:13:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585252</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ghastlyone posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620434" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620434');">Krisnatharok</a>:</said><p>It's out of stock again, but this is the one you want (just set up auto-notify and camp your email, it will go OOS within hours):<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202001" >www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a&middot;&middot;&middot;14202001</A><br><br>They get a shipment in every couple weeks.<br> </p></div>Yep, I'm either getting that one, or the 6gb version...<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202005" >www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a&middot;&middot;&middot;14202005</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585252</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:52:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585249</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : It's out of stock again, but this is the one you want (just set up auto-notify and camp your email, it will go OOS within hours):<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202001" >www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a&middot;&middot;&middot;14202001</A><br><br>They get a shipment in every couple weeks.<br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585249</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:49:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585245</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ghastlyone posted : I noticed a few people posting on that article about how this probably has to do with warranty issues on Nvidia's part, why they're disabling voltage control.<br><br>That's pure non sense. I can almost guarantee the majority of their RMA's are from other issues outside of overclocking.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585245</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:48:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585229</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ghastlyone posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620434" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620434');">Krisnatharok</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1609984" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1609984');">Ghastlyone</a>:</said><p>I'm seriously considering going with AMD this next time. They just need to step up their game a tad more to give Nvidia some real competition. I just read about the stats on the 7990 vs the gtx690. And unfortunately, it falls quite short.<br> </p></div>  At what resolution?  AMD has been owning the super-high-rez/multi-GPU efficiency scaling crown for quite a while now.<br> </p></div>They tested both 1080p and 1600p. Not only does it fall short in FPS, it also uses a shit ton more power, and is louder...<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/45073-powercolor-hd-7990-devil-13/" >hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/&middot;&middot;&middot;evil-13/</A><br><br>   <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>PowerColor's presentation is grand and the bundle is a nice touch, but while performance is exceptional at times, there's no getting round the fact that the Devil 13 is bigger, louder, less efficient and more susceptible to driver inconsistencies than the well-engineered GeForce GTX 690.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>But yeah, I think I'm going to be going with a 7970 ghz edition in the near future. Because reading about that card, it's stomps the shit out of most the gtx 680's on the market.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585229</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:41:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585216</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1609984" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1609984');">Ghastlyone</a>:</said><p>I'm seriously considering going with AMD this next time. They just need to step up their game a tad more to give Nvidia some real competition. I just read about the stats on the 7990 vs the gtx690. And unfortunately, it falls quite short.<br> </p></div>  At what resolution?  <br><br>AMD holds an edge in the super-high-rez/multi-GPU efficiency scaling arena, which is what ultimately lead me to go with the 7970.<br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585216</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:37:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585208</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1609984" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1609984');">Ghastlyone</a>:</said><p>I'm seriously considering going with AMD this next time. They just need to step up their game a tad more to give Nvidia some real competition. I just read about the stats on the 7990 vs the gtx690. And unfortunately, it falls quite short.<br> </p></div>  At what resolution?  AMD has been owning the super-high-rez/multi-GPU efficiency scaling crown for quite a while now.<br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585208</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:36:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585186</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ghastlyone posted : The more and more I read, the happier I am that I never purchased one of these new 6 series cards.<br><br>No more voltage control? What the fuck are these people thinking? That's a complete deal beaker in my book. Period.<br><br>I'm seriously considering going with AMD this next time. They just need to step up their game a tad more to give Nvidia some real competition. I just read about the stats on the 7990 vs the gtx690. And unfortunately, it falls quite short.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585186</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:29:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585089</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : Possibly related?<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by Tom's Hardware :</said><p><b><A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/MSI-GTX-660-670-overvolting-PowerEdition,18013.html#xtor=RSS-181">MSI Caught Overvolting GTX 660 Ti, 670 Power Edition Cards</A><br><br>If a company changes its product in the middle of a production run after an error becomes public, you know something&#8217;s fishy. If Nvidia steps in as well, that&#8217;s a good indication there&#8217;s something serious going on. Here&#8217;s what happened at MSI.</b><br><br>Our colleagues over at Tom&#8217;s Hardware Germany seem to have caught MSI red handed, overvolting the GPUs on the GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670 Ti Power Edition boards (Google Translate) to achieve a higher and longer lasting GPU boost state by basically circumventing the PWM controller. In other words, MSI was cheating. Perhaps no one would ever have known if it hadn&#8217;t been for one side effect. The increased voltage can cause the system to refuse to POST.<br><br>---<br><br>To verify our findings and analyze their cause, we conducted some of our own research, enlisting the help of our own UK community member starcraftgod who was also affected by the issue. After comparing notes and measurements, we took a closer look at the circuit board itself. What we found there was unexpected to say the least, and it&#8217;s almost hard to believe an engineer would create something like this on purpose. In short, the PWM controller on said cards is overvolted by up to 88 percent using a small alteration to its power supply, which leads to the chip running way outside of its specifications and at significantly deviating characteristic lines. This means that too much voltage is being applied to the GPU in general and the voltage reduction under load (droop) is not as large as it should be -- and that's just one side of the story. The other is that MSI&#8217;s tinkering can cause serious side effects.<br><br>So what&#8217;s happening? A small component completely superfluous to the normal circuit in one of the ground connections causes major overvoltage in the PWM chip in question â&#128;&#147; instead of the 5 volts specified by Richtek, the chip is hit with up to 9.3 volts. That can&#8217;t be good for its life expectancy in the long run and also causes the issues we mentioned above. In combination with some PSUs, the system will be unable to start up if the 12 volt rail has to provide more that 12 volts to one of the PowerEdition models (even within the ATX spec). In other cases, MSI&#8217;s circuit trick can trigger a black screen or cause a driver crash when a change of load occurs. We find it hard to believe in a design accident here, since the circuit in question is a standard design â&#128;&#147; if implemented correctly.<br><br>MSI got back to us with a very enlightening statement. Here&#8217;s an excerpt:<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by MSI :</said><p>    We are currently not aware of any other vendor providing this same level of performance and we&#8217;ve worked with NVIDIA to ensure that new production models will limit this free overclock boost you currently get. Our new production models with normal GPU Boost function will be on sale next month.</p></div>Reading between the lines, we can gather that Nvidia is none too pleased with MSI going off on their own. The full article on Tom&#8217;s Hardware Germany (Google Translate) covers the topic in more depth.</p></div><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27585089</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 07:46:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Nvidia&#x27;s FU to overclockers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27584992</link>
<description><![CDATA[Krisnatharok posted : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.overclockers.com/nvidia-says-no-to-voltage-control" >www.overclockers.com/nvidia-says&middot;&middot;&middot;-control</A><br><br>This really sucks for Nvidia fans.  I feel like i dodged a bullet as my Sapphire 7970 GHz Edition Vapor-X 3GB arrives tomorrow.  This card sells out crazy fast.  Looks like AMD is taking back the video card  crown.<br><small>--<br>If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Nvidias-FU-to-overclockers-27584992</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:07:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
