 | reply to vue666
Re: Canadian comes home from Guantanamo said by vue666:Not war on Afghanistan. War in Afghanistan against terrorism. War on Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Khadr sided with them against his country...
I guess you've not heard of "the war on terrorism"????
War?? There was no declared war.
At best it was a manhunt for binLaden and his mob. That the 'police' work was done by the military under 'shoot to kill' orders is effectively the difference. |
|
 IanPremium join:2002-06-18 ON kudos:1 Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| How can one be a "child soldier" in a war that doesn't, apparently, exist? You see the problem with this illogical train of reasoning? -- Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot. Simplicity and Bigfoot are found in the real world with about the same frequency. David Wong |
|
 KardinalDei Gratia ReginaPremium join:2001-02-04 N of 49th | said by Ian:How can one be a "child soldier" in a war that doesn't, apparently, exist? You see the problem with this illogical train of reasoning? I see the problem with your illogical train of reasoning, as to follow it would mean that Canadian Forces members who were in Afghanistan weren't soldiers either.
Perhaps we should use the politically correct (to go along with the nomenclature used in Gitmo) term off "underage illegal enemy combatant". -- All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers learn to steer by the stars All of us do time in the gutter, dreamers turn to look at the cars - Peart / Lifeson / Lee Join Team Helix |
|
 IanPremium join:2002-06-18 ON kudos:1 Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| said by Kardinal:said by Ian:How can one be a "child soldier" in a war that doesn't, apparently, exist? You see the problem with this illogical train of reasoning? I see the problem with your illogical train of reasoning, as to follow it would mean that Canadian Forces members who were in Afghanistan weren't soldiers either. And I'm not suggesting that the Canadian Forces weren't soldiers..... I thought that was clear. -- Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot. Simplicity and Bigfoot are found in the real world with about the same frequency. David Wong |
|
|
|