said by axus:
You don't have to prove your guilt or innocence to police. You aren't going to talk your way out of getting arrested, that's based on what they observe.
If you get arrested for child molestation, even if you're 100% innocent you're not going to look that way for a LONG time.
The fact that legally you are INNOCENT until proven guilty doesn't mean you can not be accused of committing crime so how is this different.
Nobody has a problem defending themselves in court. The problem is a process that bypasses the courts
You want to go to court over a fucking letter that doesn't even have any teeth? Seriously?
and has ISPs making quasi-legal judgments, when they aren't an impartial observer.
Police arrest you because they think you are guilty of a crime even though you haven't been to court. They are making judgments are they not? And face it cops are hardly impartial.
If you're falsely accused once by an automated process, it's likely that the broken process which accused you will repeatedly generate the same result. That's why you need an independent judge/jury to analyze the process, instead of being judged by the same company that made the broken process in the first place.
Hyperbole. I'm sure plenty of people will claim they have been falsely accused. Most of them are full of shit. 100% of those accused of rape say they were falsely accused, maybe 2% actually are.
Maybe we should abolish rape laws so those 2% don't suffer needlessly. Oh hey hyperbole is awesome!