
how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic  |
 |
|
 KardinalDei Gratia ReginaPremium join:2001-02-04 N of 49th | reply to vue666
Re: Canadian comes home from Guantanamo said by vue666:That is not evidence torture was used on Khadr...
Once again, where is the evidence Khadr was tortured? The standard of evidence that he was tortured is exactly the same as the one that was used to provide evidence that he was the one that killed the US medic -- it's all "classified" and has not been released to the public. You and others blindly believe that he *must* be guilty because you want to, yet at the same time demand the sort of burden of proof evidence that was sorely lacking in the "conviction" (that was no such thing, even after 8 years of trying by the US government) to show that he was tortured when any sane mind would realize that the stories that have come out about what went on at Gitmo would not have been isolated incidents of one or two detainees when the system was set up to do it for all of them.
You believe one story and deny another for exactly the same standard of evidence: it's convenient to your way of thinking. -- All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers learn to steer by the stars All of us do time in the gutter, dreamers turn to look at the cars - Peart / Lifeson / Lee Join Team Helix | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS 1 edit | said by Kardinal: You believe one story and deny another for exactly the same standard of evidence: it's convenient to your way of thinking.
As do you...
The difference being I quote a judge. You quote a blog... | |  KardinalDei Gratia ReginaPremium join:2001-02-04 N of 49th | You see no difference between the evidence presented as to what has gone on at Gitmo and a claim that couldn't produce a charge in 8 years of trying? That speaks volumes. 
.....back on track, yet again.......
Khadr is in Millhaven assessment facility, but I'll be curious to see where he gets sent. In the past, it would have been the Kingston Pen if he was considered to be "the worst of the worst", but since that facility is now closing it would be Millhaven for max or Collins Bay/Warkworth/Joyceville/Bath for medium security if they keep him in province. -- All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers learn to steer by the stars All of us do time in the gutter, dreamers turn to look at the cars - Peart / Lifeson / Lee Join Team Helix | | |
|  AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium join:2001-07-16 Dartmouth, NS kudos:3 | reply to vue666 Wow, didnt know judges were gods. So pray tell, please tell me the name of the Canadian judge your quoting. | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS | I thought we were talking about Guantanamo? And I wasn't aware of any Canadian Judges having jurisdiction over an US Military base....
As far as being gods, they are at the top of the food chain when it comes to the court room.... | |  booj join:2011-02-07 Richmond, ON | said by vue666:I thought we were talking about Guantanamo? And I wasn't aware of any Canadian Judges having jurisdiction over an US Military base....
As far as being gods, they are at the top of the food chain when it comes to the court room.... Seeing as the US had to invent a new court and new laws to try and convict Kahdr I don't see why you put any faith into it. | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS | reply to Kardinal said by Kardinal:You see no difference between the evidence presented as to what has gone on at Gitmo and a claim that couldn't produce a charge in 8 years of trying? That speaks volumes.  .....back on track, yet again....... Khadr is in Millhaven assessment facility, but I'll be curious to see where he gets sent. In the past, it would have been the Kingston Pen if he was considered to be "the worst of the worst", but since that facility is now closing it would be Millhaven for max or Collins Bay/Warkworth/Joyceville/Bath for medium security if they keep him in province. Sorry but that is circumstantial evidence and not direct evidence. Now kindly cite the names of the guards who tortured Khadr or a credible source who witnessed the torture of Khadr.....otherwise it is only speculation... | |  booj join:2011-02-07 Richmond, ON | said by vue666:Sorry but that is circumstantial evidence and not direct evidence. Now kindly cite the names of the guards who tortured Khadr or a credible source who witnessed the torture of Khadr.....otherwise it is only speculation... I'm curious what kind of "direct evidence" you expect from a court that states: quote: Before covering a military commission at Guantanamo Bay, reporters must agree to several ground rules about what they can publish and what they must withhold from the public.
But if you need names, how about Joshua Claus? The US booted reporters from the Guantanmo trial for naming this guard, who testified he only threatened Khadr with rape when in custody.
»www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/05/06/9···_popular
Before you accuse me of not trusting a soldier, this same guard was court-martialed for abusing prisoners in Afghanistan in 2002, and served 5 months. Details were not disclosed. This criminal's testimony was accepted wholeheartedly in Khadr's trial. | |  AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium join:2001-07-16 Dartmouth, NS kudos:3 | reply to vue666 said by vue666:I thought we were talking about Guantanamo? And I wasn't aware of any Canadian Judges having jurisdiction over an US Military base....
As far as being gods, they are at the top of the food chain when it comes to the court room.... Hah jurisdiction totally fabricated .... did you not read that there was no US jurisdiction frig its like talking to a brick wall.
Im sure you would be in equal awe facing a judge in Syria, or Iran, or Russia, or China or Cuba LOL. I believe they all have something in common - refused to sign anti landmine treaty LOL. Wait, that was the Ottawa Land Mine Treaty. Thus anybody not signing it heck theyre committing treason. -- Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla. Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"
LlamaWorks Equipment | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS | Col. Patrick Parrish, the judge presiding over Omar Khadr's military trial....
»www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2010···020.html
quote: "There is no credible evidence the accused was ever tortured
even using a liberal interpretation considering the accused's age," Parrish wrote.
| |  AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium join:2001-07-16 Dartmouth, NS kudos:3 | So whats your point. That you blindly give allegiance to an American Col over a Canadian Citizen, presiding over a kangeroo court that was stood up outside the US to avoid US jurisdiction and civilized legal rules. Pretty sad if you ask me.
Oh if your going to quote gods as though somehow their gospel.. G.W. Bush the Commander in Chief.....
WMD Quotes Before & After The Invasion
Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. Dick Cheney August 26, 2002
Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons. George W. Bush September 12, 2002
If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world. Ari Fleischer December 2, 2002
The president of the United States and the secretary of defense would not assert as plainly and bluntly as they have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction if it was not true, and if they did not have a solid basis for saying it. Ari Fleischer December 6, 2002
We know for a fact that there are weapons there. Ari Fleischer January 9, 2003
Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. George W. Bush January 28, 2003
We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more. Colin Powell February 5, 2003
We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have. George W. Bush February 8, 2003
So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? . . . I think our judgment has to be clearly not. Colin Powell March 7, 2003
We believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons. Vice President Dick Chaney March 16, 2003
Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised. George W. Bush March 17, 2003
Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly . . . all this will be made clear in the course of the operation, for whatever duration it takes. Ari Fleisher March 21, 2003
There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. And . . . as this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them. Gen. Tommy Franks March 22, 2003
I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction. Defense Policy Board member Kenneth Adelman March 23, 2003
One of our top objectives is to find and destroy the WMD. There are a number of sites. Pentagon Spokeswoman Victoria Clark March 22, 2003
We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat. Donald Rumsfeld March 30, 2003
Obviously the administration intends to publicize all the weapons of mass destruction U.S. forces find -- and there will be plenty. Neocon scholar Robert Kagan April 9, 2003
I think you have always heard, and you continue to hear from officials, a measure of high confidence that, indeed, the weapons of mass destruction will be found. Ari Fleischer April 10, 2003
We are learning more as we interrogate or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some, perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find them. George W. Bush April 24, 2003
There are people who in large measure have information that we need . . . so that we can track down the weapons of mass destruction in that country. Donald Rumsfeld April 25, 2003
We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so. George W. Bush May 3, 2003
I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now. Colin Powell May 4, 2003
We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country. Donald Rumsfeld May 4, 2003
I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons program. George W. Bush May 6, 2003
U.S. officials never expected that "we were going to open garages and find" weapons of mass destruction. Condoleeza Rice May 12, 2003
I just don't know whether it was all destroyed years ago -- I mean, there's no question that there were chemical weapons years ago -- whether they were destroyed right before the war, (or) whether they're still hidden. Maj. Gen. David Petraeus, Commander 101st Airborne May 13, 2003
I don't believe anyone that I know in the administration ever said that Iraq had nuclear weapons. Donald Rumsfeld, May 14, 2003
Before the war, there's no doubt in my mind that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical. I expected them to be found. I still expect them to be found. Gen. Michael Hagee, Commandant of the Marine Corps May 21, 2003
Given time, given the number of prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction. Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff May 26, 2003
They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer. Donald Rumsfeld May 27, 2003
For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as justification for invading Iraq) because it was the one reason everyone could agree on. Paul Wolfowitz May 28, 2003
It was a surprise to me then it remains a surprise to me now that we have not uncovered weapons, as you say, in some of the forward dispersal sites. Believe me, it's not for lack of trying. We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there.
Lt. Gen. James Conway, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force May 30, 2003
Suggest you sit down and read two things.
(1) »www.cia.gov/library/reports/gene···dex.html
(2) the book 1984
-- Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla. Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"
LlamaWorks Equipment | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS | Nice wall of text that shows you are merely grasping at straws. And whether there are WMD in Iraq or not has no relevance as to the innocence or guilt of Omar Khadr... Whether he was tortured or not... 
I would ask what are Canadian citizens (the Khadr family) doing in an Al Qaeda terrorist camp...
And as Ian has previously posted....
said by Ian:said by MaynardKrebs:But that he was hauled halfway around the world, tortured, and effectively forced to confess under duress, that's a different matter entirely. Or not. "Following the Hearing, the military judge ruled that there was no credible evidence that Khadr had ever been tortured as alleged, and that his confession was gained after it came to light that Americans had discovered a videotape of Khadr and others making IED's." » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr···_note-80Want to argue that the US judge ruled unfairly? Sure. I wasn't there. Can't say for sure. Nor, do I suspect, were you. | |  AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium join:2001-07-16 Dartmouth, NS kudos:3 | I guess I see very little different between an Al Queda Training Camp, where they simulated their craft, and the Guantanomo Bay Camp where they actually conducted their craft. I find both using cowardly methods. I find both illegal I find both contravene the geneva convention. I find both do not conform to Canadian Values.
I find it despicable that you support one of them. The difference is I support neither. You may have the right to support one of them and state it but that does not mean I have to respect you for it.
Furthermore I find it appalling that you would find it OKAY that a canadian citizen was illegally detained and put on a joke-trial, be it Amars Rendition (illegal kidnapping) by the US to be tried (tortured) in Syria, or other instances of mock injustice, such as Khadr. (not to be confused with idiots that try to smuggle drugs or pedophiles etc).
-- Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla. Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"
LlamaWorks Equipment | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS 1 edit | Wow...now you're really clutching at straws, name calling and personal insults was bad enough BUT now putting words into my mouth...
Where did I say I supported anything. Please post my exact post.
My concern is with the Khadr families involvement with Al Qaeda, being at a terrorist training camp...I'm in agreement with Wolfie's earlier post.
said by Wolfie00:said by hm : He is still a Canadian with constitutional rights. What about the constitutional rights of 34,934,792 other Canadians? Those who might prefer not to have in their midst a convicted terrorist and acknowledged al Qaeda supporter brought up with a potentially incorrigible hatred for the West? You simply have no comprehension of the world we live in today....
PS: I've read 1984 and Animal Farm. They were nice reads but do not prove or disprove the guilt or innocence of Omar or the Khadr family... | |  IanPremium join:2002-06-18 ON kudos:1 Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| reply to Anav said by Anav:I guess I see very little different between an Al Queda Training Camp, where they simulated their craft, and the Guantanomo Bay Camp where they actually conducted
.... I find both do not conform to Canadian Values. OK, But, the former one DID conform to Omar Khadr's values despite his being Canadian by mere geographical happen-stance. And at several they taught Khadr to be a proper Al Queda terrorist. He learned his lessons well, apparently.
The latter is not a Canadian institution; Never was, continues to not be.
said by Anav:Furthermore I find it appalling that you would find it OKAY that a canadian citizen was illegally detained and put on a joke-trial... Would that be how you'd characterize Khadr's "punishment" to Tabitha Speers, widow of Christopher Speers, the army medic murdered by Khadr? A medic, who, six days before being murdered by Omar Khadr, risked his life to save two Afghani children trapped in a minefield?
How about to the two kids, now without a father, left by Omar Khadr? Think you could look any of them in the eye and say Khadr's treatment was "unjust"? -- Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot. Simplicity and Bigfoot are found in the real world with about the same frequency. David Wong | |  AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium join:2001-07-16 Dartmouth, NS kudos:3 | I hear you Ian, we dont know all the facts, in fact its hard to make any sort of judgement based on how the whole thing transpired. If they had tried Khadr as a juvenile in a proper court of law, as per our system or standard US system, then I would not be arguing about process. There are lots of people-families in Canada that may have similar sentiments you descibe, but they are still here, so its not illegal to harbour ill will, however its illegal to carry out criminal activities. -- Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla. Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"
LlamaWorks Equipment | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS 2 edits | Interesting article by MacLeans.... the article reports while in Guantánamo Bay Omar played basketball & soccer, watched tv, got special comfort socks, acne cream, extra juices & salads in his lunch, learned literature and high school equivalency courses...
Yup, sounds a lot like the dark dungeons of the middle ages....
»www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/04/into···unknown/
quote: About a boy, now man, who blames everyone else for his lot in lifeexcept the extremist father who sent him into battle in the first place.
| |  KardinalDei Gratia ReginaPremium join:2001-02-04 N of 49th | said by vue666:Interesting article by MacLeans.... the article reports while in Guantánamo Bay Omar played basketball & soccer, watched tv, got special comfort socks, acne cream, extra juices & salads in his lunch, learned literature and high school equivalency courses... It's also the place where we got images like this:


Now, do we know which prisoners got which treatment? No, we don't. Does anyone think that one that they spent 8 years trying to charge and get a confession/statement from got to play soccer, extra food and TV? Or would it be more of the sensory deprivation and physical tiring/forced action type of treatment (all of which depend on where you draw the line on what is torture and what isn't)? Answer honestly.
Let's keep in mind that the "due process" was the kangaroo court in Gitmo which had some pretty strong international condemnation, like this one from one of the US allies in Iraq and Afghanistan (specifically, from a sitting judge in the UK):
said by this article :One of Britain's most senior judges condemned the American courts last night for a "monstrous failure of justice" by refusing to rule on the claims of Taliban suspects held without trial at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
Lord Steyn, a serving law lord, said the United States was acting illegally by holding the men without trial since their transfer from Afghanistan early last year.
"By denying the prisoners the right to raise challenges in a court about their alleged status and treatment, the United States government is in breach of the minimum standards of customary international law," he said. Wow, that sounds like a fair trial with an unbiased system and judge who would look at everything fairly and without prejudice.
From the same cbc.ca article quoted above:
Threats of gang rape did not prompt Omar Khadr to make any self-incriminating statements and no evidence exists that the Canadian citizen was tortured, the military judge in his Guantanamo Bay war-crimes trial said in a decision released Friday. Translation: "At the time, our government considered waterboarding to be an interrogation technique, so it wasn't technically torture, nor were threats of gang rape torture because we decided those are just intimidation techniques to get what we want, just like the sensory deprivation and physical fatigue 'techniques' we used".
"While the accused was 15 years old at the time he was captured, he was not immature for his age," Parrish said. "The accused had sufficient training, education and experience to understand the circumstances in which he found himself." Translation: "He's a child soldier, as defined by the international agreement, but we've decided that he was an adult and took our view of right/wrong regardless of circumstance or upbringing because we have more might and might makes right."
The judge took a dim view of Khadr's affidavit in which he alleges abuse and mistreatment, especially given that the accused chose not to take the stand and be cross-examined on it. Translation: "You didn't let me rip you after you'd been softened up by our prison tactics, so I'm going to summarily dismiss any claim." -- All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers learn to steer by the stars All of us do time in the gutter, dreamers turn to look at the cars - Peart / Lifeson / Lee Join Team Helix | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS | reply to Anav said by Anav  Furthermore I find it appalling that you would find it OKAY that a canadian citizen was illegally detained and put on a joke-trial, be it Amars Rendition (illegal kidnapping) by the US to be tried (tortured) in Syria, or other instances of mock injustice, such as Khadr. (not to be confused with idiots that try to smuggle drugs or pedophiles etc). [/QUOTE : Please post the exact quote where I alleged the above... Or kindly apologize. My concern has always been the Khadrs very close ties to Bin Laden and what the hell where they doing at an Al Qaeda terrorist camp...
I've alleged that their actions could be considered treason. You've alleged Omar has been tortured.
I've let the name calling and insulting pass... Now I am asking you to reference my post where I said torture or kidnapping was OK...
You will not comply because I did not make any such claims... now who is having a problem connecting the dots? | |  vue666I'm in the prime of my senilityPremium join:2007-12-07 Halifax, NS | reply to Kardinal said by Kardinal: Translation: "He's a child soldier, as defined by the international agreement, but we've decided that he was an adult and took our view of right/wrong regardless of circumstance or upbringing because we have more might and might makes right."
But I thought there was doubt that this was a war? So soldier does not qualify...
Also I maybe wrong but I thought one of the prerequisites for being a soldier was belonging to a recognized military organization. My understanding is Al Qaeda is NOT a military organization but a terrorist group and or possibly a criminal organization...
I also thought Child Soldiers were made to turn against their parents by their captives and part of the brainwashing was killing their father and raping their mother. I thought Khadr was under the control of his father when he joined Al Qaeda?
So kindly enlighten me the 14-16 year old boys who fought for Canada and allies in WWI or WWII would they then be considered Child Soldiers? | |
|