FutureMonAch Du LieberPremium,ExMod 2002-05Reviews:
|reply to Kearnstd |
Re: More possible jurer bias in Apple v Samsung
I brought this up in an earlier thread:
»Re: Apple admiting they can't compete?
said by FM :
I bet the whole thing is tossed due to the jurys disregard for prior art, and the foreman of the jury just happening to have a few patents of his own. He should have been dismissed from service when that became known.
Adding to that fact he actually got sued by them (in-part) it gets even more interesting.
Q: How many theoretical physicists specializing in general relativity does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Two. One to hold the bulb and one to rotate the universe.