 DKSDamn Kidney StonesPremium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-03-22
Owen Sound, ON
kudos:2
 ·Bell Sympatico
| reply to JohnInSJ
Re: [WIN7] Recommended SSD System Tweaks? said by JohnInSJ:Is it just me or did Fred test the wrong thing.
If not aligned, WRITEs are a problem
- a write can cause two SSD blocks to need to be updated, which is an unnecessary update to a flash memory block. Life-1 for no reason
- a write update to two blocks is going to take more time than a write to one block
So, testing read speeds is going to show either of these things how, exactly?
You might find this thread helpful in response to Fred's comments:
»windowssecrets.com/forums/showth···e-drives
Frankly, it seems to be, for most people, searching after the Holy Grail. And except for the very technical or extremely anal, not to amount to a hill of beans.
--
Need-based health care not greed-based health care. |
|
 JohnInSJPremium
join:2003-09-22
San Jose, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·Comcast
| The linked comments say exactly what I said, with more words 
Write is the issue, not read. Slight but possibly insignificant in modern SSD increase in wear. Two read/writes vs 1... two REALLY FAST R/Ws, but still, double the time. For Writes. Sometimes. So Fred tested the wrong thing (read speed)
--
My place : »www.schettino.us |
|
 digitalfuturSees More Than ShownPremium
join:2000-07-15
BurlingtonON
kudos:2 | reply to DKS
Agreed. Even defragging sata drives is required only rarely (once or twice every 6 months).
Super fast CPUs and HDDs render the performance penalty of fragmentation as close to 0 as a mechanical device can be.
Sometimes ya just gotta let go...
--
Logic requires one to deal with decisions that one's ego will not permit.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing - Edmund Burke. |
|
