alkizmo join:2007-06-25 Pierrefonds, QC 1 edit |
Why only 1 ground terminal and 2 hot/neutral on receptacles?I'm wiring 25 new receptacles over 5 circuits and god damn if there was a second ground terminal everything would be dandy to run in series the receptacles.
I never noticed that "issue" until now (Where I'm not just replacing existing receptacles).
Is there a reason they make us pig-tail the ground and ONLY the ground?
edit - I think I have figured out why (Though it's only "thinking"). If someone were to remove a receptacle and wing-nut the wires together, they could forget/not bother to wing-nut the ground wires as well and thus you'd have no ground down the line. |
|
Msradell Premium Member join:2008-12-25 Louisville, KY |
Msradell
Premium Member
2012-Oct-6 6:08 pm
The only reason I can think of is that there are 2 hot/neutral terminals because you have the ability to remove the jumper and have two separate circuits on the receptacle. If you do that then you only have one screw terminal for the hot and neutral. |
|
|
|
to alkizmo
So there are no ground loops. Metal boxes or plastic? If they are metal, have you thought about using self-grounding receptacles? Then you wouldn't have to run a ground wire from the box to the receptacle. |
|
John Galt6Forward, March Premium Member join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp |
to alkizmo
So you're not tailing out the hots & neutrals, and using the device as a junction? |
|
Zach Premium Member join:2006-11-26 Llano, CA |
Zach
Premium Member
2012-Oct-6 6:28 pm
said by John Galt6:So you're not tailing out the hots & neutrals, and using the device as a junction? I guess that single ground terminal is working to prevent the OP from making the same mistake with the equipment ground. |
|
Zach |
to whizkid3
said by whizkid3:So there are no ground loops.
Metal boxes or plastic? If they are metal, have you thought about using self-grounding receptacles? Then you wouldn't have to run a ground wire from the box to the receptacle. No ground loops!! Try as I might, my OCD keeps me from eliminating the damn grounding jumper when using self-grounding devices. |
|
PeeWee Premium Member join:2001-10-21 Madera, CA |
to alkizmo
Why only 1 ground terminal and 2 hot/neutral on receptacles?
To eliminate any cause of failure of grounding circuit other than the wiring itself. |
|
|
to alkizmo
I usually use all stranded wire & metal boxes. I like the Ideal Term-A-Nut pigtails with #10 lugs.
For multiple device boxes, I had bought a box of 3-tailed jumpers that all had ring lugs on a single 10-32 green hex screw. Two tails had spade lugs on the other end, for attaching to devices, and one was just stripped fine stranded wire for attaching to the raceway grounding conductor. Can't remember who made those.
The prospect of putting about 25 backwired spec grade receptacles in 3x2x2.5 boxes with 12 AWG conductors certainly cured me of any desire to add grounding jumpers to self-grounding devices. |
|
|
to Msradell
said by Msradell:The only reason I can think of is that there are 2 hot/neutral terminals because you have the ability to remove the jumper and have two separate circuits on the receptacle. If you do that then you only have one screw terminal for the hot and neutral. THIS! A single (simplex) receptacle only has one of each screw. |
|
|
Jack Legg to alkizmo
Anon
2012-Oct-7 10:29 am
to alkizmo
I never pigtail a receptacle when there are back wire terminal pockets available.
In fact, in the industrial control cabinet world, 99.9999% of wire connections are made on screw clamp terminal blocks.
Wire nuts are virtually never used! |
|
alkizmo join:2007-06-25 Pierrefonds, QC |
Now yes I am using the device as a junction. I am aware of the downside in terms of loose terminals causing all receptacles down the line to stop, but I'd be very familiar with the wirin to fix it.
Anyway I could pig tail the standard receptacles if you guys convince me to do so (I stopped after 2 receptacles as I had to leave to do other things.)
However my main issue was with the gfci I put at the beginning of the circuit to protect all receptacles down stream. D Those you gotta use as a junction and yet still force to pig tail the ground when you have already very little space left in the box (due to gfci size) |
|
alkizmo 1 edit |
to Jack Legg
Jack, I wish they were back entry with screw terminals, but I needed all tamper proof receptacles in bulk. The choice was limited so I got stuck with screw terminals + backstabs(which I won't use).
Same thing for the self-grounding receptacles. There wasn't that option in store. |
|
John Galt6Forward, March Premium Member join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp |
to alkizmo
The 'proper way' is to pigtail all conductors prior to connection to the device.
In my jurisdiction that is mandatory, even though the Code requires it only on MWBCs. |
|
alkizmo join:2007-06-25 Pierrefonds, QC |
said by John Galt6:The 'proper way' is to pigtail all conductors prior to connection to the device.
In my jurisdiction that is mandatory, even though the Code requires it only on MWBCs. I don't deny the advantage of pigtailing. I'll give it a shot, see if I can tolerate the extra carpal tunnel. Out of curiosity, what does your jurisdiction say about connecting receptacles downstream of a GFCI? Can't pigtail the load side of a GFCI right? |
|
|
to John Galt6
said by John Galt6:The 'proper way' is to pigtail all conductors prior to connection to the device. Sorry, but this is NOT the "proper" way. It is one way. said by John Galt6:In my jurisdiction that is mandatory, even though the Code requires it only on MWBCs. Is this in writing somewhere? Or do they just like to see it? |
|
alkizmo join:2007-06-25 Pierrefonds, QC |
said by Speedy Petey:Sorry, but this is NOT the "proper" way. It is one way. What is the "proper" way? Or were you just saying that there is no one "proper" way? |
|
Zach Premium Member join:2006-11-26 Llano, CA 1 edit |
Zach
Premium Member
2012-Oct-7 8:56 pm
said by alkizmo:said by Speedy Petey:Sorry, but this is NOT the "proper" way. It is one way. What is the "proper" way? Or were you just saying that there is no one "proper" way? If the circuit in question is NOT a MWBC, either feeding through the device and pig-tailing is generally acceptable. Some AHJ's require and some ECs prefer to pig-tail. For MWBCs, feeding through the device isn't allowed on the grounded conductors. Obviously, in the case of GFCI receptacles, you have no choice but to feed through if you are also protecting loads down-stream. Edit to add: 300.13 Mechanical and Electrical Continuity - Conductors
(B) Device Removal. In multiwire branch circuits, the continuity of a grounded conductor shall not depend on device connections such as lampholders, receptacles, and so forth, where the removal of such devices would interrupt the continuity.
I always tail where possible. |
|
1 edit |
said by Zach:said by alkizmo:said by Speedy Petey:Sorry, but this is NOT the "proper" way. It is one way. What is the "proper" way? Or were you just saying that there is no one "proper" way? If the circuit in question is NOT a MWBC, either feeding through the device and pig-tailing is generally acceptable. Some AHJ's require and some ECs prefer to pig-tail. For MWBCs, feeding through the device isn't allowed. Obviously, in the case of GFCI receptacles, you have no choice but to feed through if you are also protecting loads down-stream. They don't have to be pigtailed on non MWBC circuits but: the neutrals must be pigtailed on MWBC installation. 300.13 Mechanical and Electrical Continuity Conductors (B) Device Removal In multiwire branch circuits, the continuity of a grounded conductor shall not depend on device connections such as lampholders, receptacles, and so forth, where the removal of such devices would interrupt the continuity. Losing a neutral on a MWBC |
|
Zach Premium Member join:2006-11-26 Llano, CA |
Zach
Premium Member
2012-Oct-7 9:19 pm
said by Jack_in_VA:They don't have to be pigtailed on non MWBC circuits but:
the neutrals must be pigtailed on MWBC installation.
300.13 Mechanical and Electrical Continuity Conductors (B) Device Removal In multiwire branch circuits, the continuity of a grounded conductor shall not depend on device connections such as lampholders, receptacles, and so forth, where the removal of such devices would interrupt the continuity. Posts and edits must have crossed. Since I don't usually feed-through, I had to find the text. |
|
|
I was doing an edit sorry |
|
|
to alkizmo
I have been replacing outlets here as I can, switches too. I pigtail the devices with 14 str and then cut out the old backstabbed device and wire nut in the new. The grounds from the build are secured together with a special crimp connection ( the name escapes me at this time) so they are permanent. This ensures disconnection of a device doesn't interrupt ground down the line. Same as it was discussed above.
It's a pita jamming the device plus the pigtails back in the box sometimes but it is worth it from a serviceability standpoint. |
|
alkizmo join:2007-06-25 Pierrefonds, QC |
said by Hahausuck:It's a pita jamming the device plus the pigtails back in the box sometimes but it is worth it from a serviceability standpoint. My issue with pigtailing (aside from being a PITA) is that it's adding another "junction" that can go bad. Plus it's harder to tell if the wires are held properly by the wingnut especially when you're working in a small space (gang box). If the only real downside is that in the event that a wire gets loose from a receptacle, all receptacles downstream go dark, then I can live with it. Pigtail or not, if a connection gets loose, you will have to go fix the problem. I'd rather know about it quickly due to multiple receptacles going dark than finding out months later because the faulty receptacle in question is rarely used. Bonus question: I'd like to identify the downstream wires in gang boxes in case I wanted to split a circuit into two. Is there a color code for that? If there isn't any universal color code or "method", what color code could I use (for myself) that wouldn't bring confusion? I'm guessing black tape on the black wire and white on neutral could avoid confusion and still be a hint for me, but it might already be a code for something else |
|
nunyaLXI 483 MVM join:2000-12-23 O Fallon, MO ·Charter
1 edit |
nunya
MVM
2012-Oct-9 11:03 am
I'll generally pigtail everything on new work. Since I'm in charge, and all the boxes are appropriately sized, space is not an issue. In retro-work, tiny boxes are quite the norm. Usually it's only in these instances that I will use the device as a "pass through".
My experience has been that a proper wire nut connection will outlive the device.
You'll find the answer your question specifically in NEC 250.148: (B) Grounding Continuity. The arrangement of grounding connections shall be such that the disconnection or the removal of a receptacle, luminaire (fixture), or other device fed from the box does not interfere with or interrupt the grounding continuity.
I'm sure Canada has a similar rule. |
|
fcisler Premium Member join:2004-06-14 Riverhead, NY |
to alkizmo
I'm not sure if you are using these, but you should be: » www.idealindustries.com/ ··· roundingGreenies. Leave one of the ground wires long enough to reach the receptacle(s), cut the rest short. Slide this over the longest one and then tighten. FWIW, I will always pigtail the line and load. Any devices downstream are unaffected by the outlets. If I am doing two outlets I will either "loop" the wire from the one to the next or use the other set of terminals. |
|
|
to Jack_in_VA
I love that power point! |
|
MaynardKrebsWe did it. We heaved Steve. Yipee. Premium Member join:2009-06-17 |
to alkizmo
said by alkizmo:said by Speedy Petey:Sorry, but this is NOT the "proper" way. It is one way. What is the "proper" way? Or were you just saying that there is no one "proper" way? The 'proper' way is whatever code says in your jurisdiction. Canadian & US electrical codes differ in some areas of practice. |
|
Msradell Premium Member join:2008-12-25 Louisville, KY |
to fcisler
said by fcisler:I'm not sure if you are using these, but you should be:
»www.idealindustries.com/ ··· rounding
Greenies. Leave one of the ground wires long enough to reach the receptacle(s), cut the rest short. Slide this over the longest one and then tighten. I've never seen those before they certain look handy! |
|
|
to fcisler
FYI, I was going to post a photo of Greenies the other night; downloaded a photo, and then my PC started slowing down, so I went to bed. You beat me to it. However, bear in mind one thing about the installation. A careful reading of the NEC (for those in the US), requires (with metal boxes), that the ground wire from the power source be connected directly to the box. From there, your pigtails can go to your wiring devices. This means the long wire in the Greenie, must come from the source and go to the ground screw in the metal box. Running it to a receptacle; or using cutting the source wire short and putting it into the Greenie is not proper. Anyway, they are great. I always use them, as I am sure most electricians do (even nunya). |
|
nunyaLXI 483 MVM join:2000-12-23 O Fallon, MO |
nunya
MVM
2012-Oct-11 1:38 am
I've had the same box of greenies for at least 5 years. I don't use them very often. I don't like the way they lay. I just don't see the advantage. I am lazy enough to buy pre-fab ground tails though. |
|
alkizmo join:2007-06-25 Pierrefonds, QC |
to whizkid3
said by whizkid3:the ground wire from the power source be connected directly to the box. Yeah that's a pain added to the mix. Fortunately, out of my 25 receptacles, 20 of them are in PVC gang boxes (Those made to be air tight as vapor barrier because they're on external walls). BTW what I chose to do/am doing is that I'm pigtailing, BUT I only do 2 boxes per evening after work. That way I avoid getting carpal tunnel and cutting corners because I get annoyed. Steady as she goes! |
|