Talk > Pub Games > [game] Crazy Game - The Battle for Demacia

reply to Kristopher

Re: [game] Crazy Game - The Battle for Demacia

You can't really blame a win/loss on a single game considering the RNG. We lost pretty badly (6-1 I think) and I was screwed but tried to role-claim best I could (the snatcher and RB are different, right?), but I think mafia might have had more of a chance of if they kept the vig shot...
--
If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.

reply to Krisnatharok
Necromancer.

Never forget.

reply to Goggalor
Thanks for the comments guys, I will take this into account for next games. The vig shot was a though call because the possesor role was giving the town 2 kills a night already which could have gone out of hand real quick.

And the inclusion of the possessor role was based on the previous game where we voted to night without thinking about it, now with the role in place people was at least trying to get people to talk before accepting that they could be the next to be turned to the dark side.
--
Judge a man by the trials of his shield, not the empty reaping of his sword.

I think the RNG completely worked in the town's favor. I don't think we ever had a double-death all game.

That means town was successful in blocking at least 50% of the kills, at least for the first two nights. Even later, we had several successful protections.

It would be interesting to see a game with mafia starting with two possessors and with a night kill ability that isn't activated until both possessors are stopped. Think of it as stages in a boss fight.
--
If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.

Exactly it was all about the RNG I prefered to go to the safe side the higher the number of townied the lower the chance to get a good protection which actually happened this game.
--
Judge a man by the trials of his shield, not the empty reaping of his sword.

They should have just made me the jester lol

My inactivity was a mix of actual inactivity and trying to post as little as possible to avoid the word bomber. I hate that role.

"role"

BOOM

DrModem has been slain.

reply to Goggalor

reply to Kristopher

reply to Goggalor
You do realize, even being drug out (which EVERY game does at some point, some more than others).... those 3 people were town? If you would have pushed for them, even being inactive, you would have hurt the town and could have lost the game?

The point of the game is to win, not to make it go fast. If you want a fast game (and believe me, I was the only mod who would do timed games because I hated how long they took :P), then you can ask for someone to host a timed game or host one yourself to try it out.
--
»Re: [game] Crazy Game - The Resurrection - Day 2
Corrupt Politician - tmodelt
You may privately message the rest of the mafia: ekster, Rook008 & Kristopher. You win with the mafia.

reply to Antonica
Flavor should have nothing to do with game mechanics. That's why players should not know their flavor name until after death. Gives unfair advantage over those who don't know the flavor. We lost a few regular players over that. I think regular CG's without flavor are the best way to go now.

My order was incorrect. Switches happen before kills. But blocks should take precedence over switches in case the switcher is blocked.
--
Play DSLr Mafia: »Pub Games

I don't think you can say anything has precedence over anything.

It's circular.

Blocks can't have precedence over switches because if switcher switches player A and B, and blocker switcher, then switcher is blocked and cannot switch (which is fine.) But if the blocker blocks player A, and it takes precedence to the switcher, then player A remains blocked (not fine!)

It should be more of finding the unaffected players, perform their actions first, and from there, deal with the rest. Precedence should never be set in stone.

Agreed. It's basically what makes most sense.

reply to ekster

Forget to add one thing.

*when ekster shoots someone, it takes precedence over everything and everyone but ekster dies.

reply to Antonica
Also there was no flavor that provided any advantage to the game, all the player's flavors were revealed upon death (well only Arch knew he was teemo but it was pretty obvious).
--
Judge a man by the trials of his shield, not the empty reaping of his sword.

I think they mean about the part where it was hinted that Jim died because he tried to possess Kristopher. It kind of made things a bit easier instead of guessing why he was killed.