Topic 'Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks' in forum '' - dslreports.com

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:56:23 EDT

fuziwuzi posted : Several of my friends here in Atlanta, with 3GS and 4, are now getting HSPA+ instead of EDGE. Perhaps it depends on your neighborhood. They are in Midtown.
--
Teabaggers: Destroying America is Priority #1

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:29:41 EDT

anon posted : Why is t-mobile ranking funny? They are ranked higher (17) than Verizon (18) and AT&T (20)....although there is a 6-7 month difference in reported numbers.

Yet, t-mobile is considered 3rd largest in USA?

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:38:48 EDT

saiflu posted : Hi,
Did you say you were getting 4G in Atlanta?

I live here and am not getting any 4G, only Edge.

Where exactly are you getting 4G?

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:40:34 EDT

civicturbo posted : Thanks for posting this info, I had my unlocked iPhone 3GS on tmobile for awhile, I got 200k on the edge network, I switched to h2o wireless ( a mvno reselling AT&T) because their cheaper. I was paying 100 for 1000 mins. Good for 1 yr. but 1000 would never last. With h2o i got a free sim (mins bought thru pinzoo.com) and pay 25/mth prepaid monthly. For 1000 mins cool thing is $ balance rolls over, it doesn't sound like it from the site but they do.
Data is slow 150-200k and burn up the $ quick. Now if tmobile supports my 3G data on my phone that would be very enticing. I currently run around with a Clear iSpot in my pocket. (Another $25/mth unlimited data 6/1 speed unlocked works for all my wifi devices :)

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:43:05 EDT

Kommie posted :
Yep, they are doing very well the number one economy in the Europe, and Germany is the world's third largest exporter. I bet Fox News does not mention that.

They can afford to bail out the Greeks thats why they did it. They are junking their nuclear due to concerns after the Japan disaster. They are heavily investing in renewable energy.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:29:20 EDT

PhoenixDown posted : Does T-Mobile officially support visual voicemail now too?

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:16:50 EDT

fuziwuzi posted : Please read up on CURRENT information. T-Mobile has been very busy refarming spectrum to deploy HSPA+ on the 1900MHz band, which every GSM iPhone supports for high-speed data. Several friends here in Atlanta that previously switched their iPhones to T-Mobile (and accepted they were getting 2G data) now have excellent HSPA+ speeds. This is with 3Gs and 4s phones. Several other metro areas have also been refarmed, with more on the way. T-Mobile is now even advertising with billboards and radio here in Atlanta that if you move your unlocked iPhone to them, you'll now receive great "4G" data (HSPA+) at a significantly cheaper price than AT&T.
--
Teabaggers: Destroying America is Priority #1

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:30:41 EDT

pnh102 posted :

said by jseymour:

Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal are not "all of Europe." You might just as well blame the entire U.S. for California's failings.

And yet they do drag down the EU entirely. Why does the world care if 4 countries can't pay their bills? It is because when they fail, they will take the rest of the EU with them.

And we'll have to add France to that list too. A 75% tax on the rich? Good grief what stupidity.
--
Romney/Ryan 2012 - Put a couple of mature adults in charge.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:28:41 EDT

pnh102 posted :

said by Kommie:

Stop listening to Fox News. Scandinavia, Germany, and even Poland are doing very well. Greece is whats talked about, but there are other countries in Europe that are not having any economic failures.

Germany is doing well? After bailing out Greece twice? That's a laugh.

Even they will run out of money at some point if they keep this BS up. And now they are looking to junk nuclear power completely? What a bunch of fools.
--
Romney/Ryan 2012 - Put a couple of mature adults in charge.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:04:19 EDT

PhoenixDown posted :

said by camaro92:

Plus for people who travel abroad there isn't much CDMA coverage if at all.

Verizon will let you unlock any phone for international use. I can unlock my iphone for travel abroad if I wished. Only a few minor caveats on this which shouldn't be a problem for nearly all customers.
--
1/22/2012 Delegate Count
Newt 25 | Romney 14 | Ron Paul 10 | Santorum 8

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:55:54 EDT

CCNnorthcali posted : T-Mobile is deploying 1900Mhz HSPA+ at a lightning pace. Check out user reports here:
»airportal.de/

T-Mobile's coverage is not bad in urban areas, it just depends. Their plans are a great value for a lot of people. T-Mobile's LTE (launching next year, they're already working on it) is going to be compatible with all AT&T LTE phones.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:46:19 EDT

Rob posted :

said by jseymour:

This thread is doing a terrific job of confirming my decision to take a pass on "smart"phones :)

Jim

Smartphones have their intended purpose, and for those of us that need access to e-mail, Internet, etc, they make for a wonderful tool.

I personally am enjoying my iPhone 5. More than I thought I would.
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:26:50 EDT

jseymour posted : This thread is doing a terrific job of confirming my decision to take a pass on "smart"phones :)

Jim

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:53:48 EDT

camaro92 posted : Agree, But it still makes me feel better to complain. :D

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:50:54 EDT

elefante72 posted : That is not true for any provider today, CDMA or GSM. The base frequencies are uniform(2G, mainly voice), but data (3G, LTE) frequencies are all over the map so if the phone doesn't support that band, then your $600 smartphone is a flip phone.

Outside of carriers locking phones, they create phones that don't work on others spectrum.

The big issue for Tmo is that their HSPA+ is very fast, except it has poor coverage and only their phones support these modes.

None of the iphones (CDMA/GSM - the CDMA do GSM) use data on 3G for TMO, it's all edge (2G), so dialup.

The iphone 5 now uses LTE in addition to the others, except Tmo current bands are still left out. So unless they have 1900Mhz (and I think Vegas just got on line) you are still on dialup. The metropcs dumping will help because they have CDMA frequencies and the all important NorthEast bandwidth that was lacking.

This is years down the road, so why would you want to put a $700 device in dialup mode when there are lots of prepaid options where it works in LTE mode? Or you could just pay the postpaid bounty.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:35:48 EDT

MovieLover76 posted : Carriers are always going to upgrade the areas that give them the biggest return on their investment first, ie Cites and other heavily populated areas and really they wouldn't be a very good business if they didn't.

As long as corporations run our wireless and wireline infrastructure, if you choose to live in very rural areas where you can't even see a neighbor, your going to be the last the get upgrades.
Like everything else it's a trade-off of where you choose to live, congestion and everything right at your fingertips when you live in a populated area like I do, NJ or open spaces and driving half an hour to the supermarket (not saying you do, but my parents lived in a place like you describe and it was a half hour drive to the supermarket)

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:35:43 EDT

Bob61571 posted : I have a number of Belgian friends (10) that just got laid off in last few weeks.... Manufacturing production / orders are down at their facility and other Euro facilities for this large US company.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:30:52 EDT

jseymour posted :

said by Telco:

That's interesting because Repubs always talk about the market forces. Yet whenever you indicate failure after failure within the market of this flawed creed, I hear crickets.

That's because some (many? most?) conservatives take it too far, just as some (many? most?) liberals take it too far the other way.

It is possible to have free and open markets, where market forces compete, and have the public not getting screwed. It's also possible to have reasonable government oversight and regulation and have businesses not getting screwed.

For example: If you own the device, all compatible carriers must accept it. If a carrier subsidizes a phone, they are allowed to lock it to their network, but they must unlock it once the subsidization is satisfied. Carriers may not charge for subsidizing a phone when they're not, in fact, subsidizing a phone.

said by pnh102:

That's interesting because Democrats always talk about how great everything in Europe is. Yet whenever you indicate failure after failure in Europe's own economic and debt problems of their flawed approach, I hear crickets.

Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal are not "all of Europe." You might just as well blame the entire U.S. for California's failings.

The truth is we have some of the most expensive, least bang-for-your-buck subscription TV, broadband and wireless services in the world. I don't care how you slice it, that's just wrong.

Jim

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:11:58 EDT

camaro92 posted : No I wont disagree you have a good point, but if they do start upgrading we all know where its going to be. I would guess to say Boston, New York City, L.A. to name a few.

I just don't want to live in a big city or around one to get top notch coverage, I like going outside and cant see any of my neighbors,and I don't want a SAT. phone just to make a phone call.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:02:17 EDT

anon posted :

said by pnh102:

Too bad this isn't true for CDMA-based providers. It'd be nice if you could simply enter the ESN for any CDMA phone into your provider's website and BAM... service.

you actually can in ,ost cases if you are willing to do a bit of 'flashing' to get the setting right.

while sprint does not allow flashed phones. verizon, cricket and metro always have. so while it is extremely rare for people to put spirnt phones on verizon it is entirely possible. flashing is common on cricket and metropcs.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 10:58:14 EDT

Kommie posted : Stop listening to Fox News. Scandinavia, Germany, and even Poland are doing very well. Greece is whats talked about, but there are other countries in Europe that are not having any economic failures.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 10:55:06 EDT

MovieLover76 posted : Carrier subsidies need to go, these subsidies are really a myth, they don't foot the bil, you do in the form of higher monthly bills, that they continue to charge you for even after the subsidy is covered.

Look at the $20 a month saving you get if you buy your own phone on t-mobile, or the prepaid byod sim plans and you'll quickly realize that those phone subsidies are actually not in the customer's best interest, maybe one day Sprint will follow t-mobile plans.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:59:00 EDT

pnh102 posted :

said by Telco:

That's interesting because Repubs always talk about the market forces. Yet whenever you indicate failure after failure within the market of this flawed creed, I hear crickets.

Yawn. We get it. Everything is the Republicans' fault even when they aren't in power. Amazing how they can pull that off.

said by Telco:

It's not because CDMA carriers couldn't allow it, rather, it's much easier for them to block it and lock you into their network. It's no coincidence that this is not a problem elsewhere (like Europe)

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:55:05 EDT

IllIlIlllIll posted :

said by Rob:

Wasn't there a time where the carriers were touting this idea that, once their networks were in sync, consumers would have the option of taking their device to any carrier they wanted?

that was a long time ago when there wasnt that many networks around, the biggest one at that time was at&t.
--
Suffolk County NY Police Feed - »www.scpdny.com
PS3 Gaming Feed - »www.livestream.com/elitedata

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:47:26 EDT

Rob posted : You'll probably disagree with me, but I firmly believe that, because of Apple, AT&T, VZW, and soon, Sprint, have been upgrading their network to support the iPhone.
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:47:01 EDT

Telco posted : That's interesting because Repubs always talk about the market forces. Yet whenever you indicate failure after failure within the market of this flawed creed, I hear crickets.

It's not because CDMA carriers couldn't allow it, rather, it's much easier for them to block it and lock you into their network. It's no coincidence that this is not a problem elsewhere (like Europe), where the 'government' (aka We the People) have mandated open and compatible handsets and networks.

Our way is another reason why Verizon can now charge $40 for 300mb and get away with it too.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:45:46 EDT

camaro92 posted : How about instead of running around spending money to bend over backwards for Apple just to get a buggy phone, I want more coverage, a hell of a lot more coverage. When I drive to Timbuktu I want full bars no question's asked.

If it wasn't for the cheapest plans of all carriers I would have jumped ship, but I like my freedom of a GSM network. Plus for people who travel abroad there isn't much CDMA coverage if at all.

Anyone who wants to read about the world carriers and there customer base here it is, scroll down and see where T mobile is ranked it's pretty funny.

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mo···perators

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:43:41 EDT

anon posted : Maybe the smaller carriers or elsewhere in the world, but no legitimate carrier here in the US would be want that. Or consumers for that matter as that would destroy carrier's phone subsidies.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:26:57 EDT

Slagish posted : Wouldn't that be nice.

On the plus side, at least verizon iPhone 5 seem to work on AT&T HSPA+ network. And possibly work on Tmobiles network also.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:17:03 EDT

mech1164 posted :

said by pnh102:

Too bad this isn't true for CDMA-based providers. It'd be nice if you could simply enter the ESN for any CDMA phone into your provider's website and BAM... service.

That's what consumers want not what carriers want. The Carriers want only two things. More of your Money and CONTROL. By controlling the handsets and access they can force you to pay more money than it's worth for services you want. One day we might get it right as of now don't hold you breath.

Re: One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:07:42 EDT

pnh102 posted : Too bad this isn't true for CDMA-based providers. It'd be nice if you could simply enter the ESN for any CDMA phone into your provider's website and BAM... service.
--
Romney/Ryan 2012 - Put a couple of mature adults in charge.

One Phone, Multiple Networks

Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:05:13 EDT

Rob posted : Wasn't there a time where the carriers were touting this idea that, once their networks were in sync, consumers would have the option of taking their device to any carrier they wanted?
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us