republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
5436
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
AuthorAll Replies


useragent

@74.198.65.x

reply to NICK ADSL UK

Re: Mozilla Firefox 16.0.1 Final

It did update to 16.0.1. In the about:support page, on the line that says user agent, it shows 16.0 at the end. So the browser id's itself as 16.0 to web servers.


antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

1 edit

reply to NICK ADSL UK
Got it in updated Mac OS X 10.7.5 and Windows XP Pro. SP3 through Firefox v16.0.0's internal updaters. Is it me or did it give the whole installers (Mac OS X's 32 MB and Windows' 22 MB!)?



siljaline
I'm lovin' that double wide
Premium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17
Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico

reply to Pentangle
Good question, Pentangle See Profile
It's a matter of choice. For software as important as my secondary Browser, the last place I would go as a primary source would not be Major Greeks nor File Hippo but that's just me.



siljaline
I'm lovin' that double wide
Premium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17

reply to La Luna
Links have been posted, you should be able to fetch it via the infernal updater but not File Hippo nor Major Greeks, the latter especially.



siljaline
I'm lovin' that double wide
Premium
join:2002-10-12
Montreal, QC
kudos:17
Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico

reply to Name Game

Re: Mozilla Firefox 16.0.1 Final

I used to post the MVPS Hosts to Major Greeks discusion board. It was constantly deleted, why ?

Sites like Major Greeks are a cash cow for third party ads - bar none !!

As I said already, important software like a Browser should be downloaded at source and nowhere else.


Name Game
Premium
join:2002-07-07
North Myrtle Beach, SC
kudos:7

1 edit

I did not ask you why so no reason to repeat yourself..I also don't click on all your links when you post masses ones in a single post..but that's just me..now seems your response to chachazz went bye bye... Bad day in Black Rock Buddie.

Update: maybe they are fans of HP hosts thingie.



therube

join:2004-11-11
Randallstown, MD

reply to antdude

said by antdude:

Is it me or did it give the whole installers (Mac OS X's 32 MB and Windows' 22 MB!)?

I mentioned that the page before:
quote:
And starting from 16.0 release, checking for updates, downloaded the (full, which I wasn't expecting) .mar
(XP at the time.)


La Luna
Survived Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3

Still nada via internal update. Finally got it via the Mozilla download page.



antdude
A Ninja Ant
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-25
United State
kudos:4
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to therube

said by therube:

said by antdude:

Is it me or did it give the whole installers (Mac OS X's 32 MB and Windows' 22 MB!)?

I mentioned that the page before:
quote:
And starting from 16.0 release, checking for updates, downloaded the (full, which I wasn't expecting) .mar
(XP at the time.)

Thanks. I guess Mozilla had to rush for this and couldn't make and test a patch version.
--
Ant @ AQFL.net and AntFarm.ma.cx. Please do not IM/e-mail me for technical support. Use this forum or better, »community.norton.com ! Disclaimer: The views expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.


Name Game
Premium
join:2002-07-07
North Myrtle Beach, SC
kudos:7

reply to La Luna

said by La Luna:

Still nada via internal update. Finally got it via the Mozilla download page.

That was a strange one for you..now that it is updated..does the internal work too if you tried it now..or tell you all is OK ?


La Luna
Survived Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3

I just tried it, I didn't get the weird logout issue with DSLR, but it didn't tell me I was up to date either, just brought me back here.

Now that I've thought about it, I have it set to alert me to updates and I don't think it ever has, not even once. When I look at Show Update History in options, it's blank, like I've never updated FF.


Mele20
Premium
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
kudos:4

reply to NICK ADSL UK
Fx 10.0.9 ESR is not yet available at least via internal updater. Mozilla says it was released on Oct 11 but I can't get it.
--
When governments fear people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. Thomas Jefferson



Name Game
Premium
join:2002-07-07
North Myrtle Beach, SC
kudos:7

1 edit

You can read all of this from today at the link and more..but here is the last of it..

Firefox 16.0.1 is now being pushed out to the Firefox browser's auto update system and is also available to download via auto-version-detected download or from the all systems and languages page. Firefox 16.0.1 for Android is available in the Google Play store. Thunderbird 16.0.1 is also available for download. Firefox ESR 10.0.9 and Thunderbird ESR 10.0.9 are currently being quality assured and are expected to be released soon. SeaMonkey 2.13.1 has yet to appear on the project's releases page.

»www.h-online.com/open/news/item/···382.html
--
Gladiator Security Forum
»www.gladiator-antivirus.com/


Insight

join:2012-08-25

reply to NICK ADSL UK
One of the reasons I chose FF as my default browser on my iMac box was because with my monitor resolution set at its maximum I could use the keyboard to "expand" the website or screen content to fill most of the screen with readable size text or fonts and FF would remember the increase. I didn't have to do it each and every time I went to the website, even after closing and reopening FF. Not now with the new version. Bummer.



therube

join:2004-11-11
Randallstown, MD

Check to see if browser.zoom.siteSpecific is set to true in about:config.



Insight

join:2012-08-25

Thanks for the tip but even though I understand the foundation of your message. I have no idea how to do or get to where you refer to in your post. By the way in your instructions, just to be clear, I'm talking about FF for Mac--so the interface of controls or help features and preferences is different than Windows.

Thanks again.



La Luna
Survived Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3

said by Insight:

Thanks for the tip but even though I understand the foundation of your message. I have no idea how to do or get to where you refer to in your post. By the way in your instructions, just to be clear, I'm talking about FF for Mac--so the interface of controls or help features and preferences is different than Windows.

Thanks again.

Type about:config in the address bar/enter. You will get a warning box, click the "I'll be careful, I promise" button. That will bring you to what therube See Profile is talking about. Scroll down or *search* for the line he indicated to check whether it's set to true or false. Left click on it to toggle between true/false. Be careful not to accidently change anything else. Not sure if it's different in FF for Mac, but give it a try.
--
The Alien in the White House

19,694 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11


therube

join:2004-11-11
Randallstown, MD

1 edit

reply to NICK ADSL UK
Here is the exploit that affected 16.0, though its POC looks to be dead?

Firefox knows what your friends did last summer

There are two associated Mozilla bugs listed in the advisory, but (at least at the moment) neither are accessible to us peons.

Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory 2012-89 - defaultValue security checks not applied

This also looks to have been fixed in 16.0.1:

Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory 2012-88 - Miscellaneous memory safety hazards

"The Possible Impact of the Flaw

It's possible to craft code that would have the browser present the full URL paths that were visited by users, NSS Labs' Artes said. That would let hackers see what users were searching on the sites they visited.

"Additionally, with some regex work, you can have the browser provide you with usernames used on the websites," Artes said Some proof-of-concept code has been posted that displays the ability to pull cached usernames.

The historical information that can be obtained by exploiting this flaw can be used to target ad placement and other uses of this metadata regarding customers, Artes suggested.

The vulnerability doesn't let hackers see the server and domain names of other sites users have visited, Artes remarked. "

»www.technewsworld.com/story/7636···cks=true

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Sunday, 19-May 16:53:11 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics