said by Finn532:The format had me slightly confused, typically when when I read '69 ping' I'm thinking of 69 milliseconds. On your chart it said '0.69 ms' to which I immediately read it in my mind, as '69 milliseconds'. I figured that was extremely unlikely on a satellite connection. Thinking that possibly you were logging LAN traffic, instead of internet traffic, thus I posted my above post.
MY bad.
Nah, each number on the side represents a thousand in the graph, the default one second calculation shows the names of everything right, but the remainder of the graphs you sort of have to decipher.
Like where it shows "Min: 0.69ms" its actually ~690ms averaged for one hour in the last week. You can see where I was on the HN9000 it had a 6.23, which would be ~6230 which, well, I remember that, was rather annoying trying to do anything with that delay on my HN9000, just decided to hop back to Gen4 at that point.
Lan side? I would hope my lan side is reporting closer to 1-3ms
I will say this, gaming on Warcraft III: Frozen Throne, with my HN9000 even before congestion got bad on it, I had frequent stuttering. With Gen4, I have a slight delay between clicks, but so slight I hardly notice it, and no stutter or lag screen coming up. So the system is, for now, very nice IMO.