<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637275</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:37:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:37:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27864707</link>
<description><![CDATA[abookout posted : cthen, is absolutely correct. for example, if you dont see a speed limit sign the set speed limit is 25mph until you see one]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27864707</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:20:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644931</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : Downloading/uploading copyrighted material via sites like Pirate Bay is ILLEGAL : FACT<br><br>The End]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644931</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:19:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644843</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : Yes we know, you have no clue about actual law, you just make it up as you go along.<br><br>Again, the only one saying anything about accidentally downloading something... was you.  Still butt hurt over not being able to make bullshit into facts? ;)<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644843</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:36:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644674</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : When you accidently download an entire Season of Seinfeld on Pirate Bay, let me know putz. <br><br>LOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644674</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 08:35:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644552</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1846234" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1846234');">trinsic</a>:</said><p>doesnt matter if its an accident or not, you still broke the law. start trying to apply the same rules to yourself. its really easy to tell people not to break the law and not apply it to yourself.<br> </p></div>You have remember, that is the same person who couldn't even get this one right either: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27638652-Its-time">Re: Its time</A> :uhh:<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644552</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 03:25:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644111</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : LMFAO]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27644111</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:46:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27643174</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/859676" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=859676');">ITALIAN926</a>:</said><p>If you fail to see a sign of a sign indicating a decreased speed, and you happen to get pulled over, its not speeding purposefully !! How many brain cells do you have !?<br> </p></div>Already covered that awhile ago kiddo.  Yet you accuse others of not reading the thread when your not even reading your own posting?  Seems I have more brain cells than you.  Here is where it was covered:<br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1050719" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1050719');">Cthen</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/859676" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=859676');">ITALIAN926</a>:</said><p>If I dont see a sign, and go over the limit, thats on purpose? I dont know about your logic here buddy.<br> </p></div>I have spoken with not only police officers on this but lawyers and judges as well.  It falls under the category of "your fault" as ignorance of the law is not a qualified defence.<br><br><b>Yes your state has a law that says if you don't see a sign then they have a set speed limit you should be going under unsigned roadways.  You didn't follow it, you broke the law.</b>  ;)<br> </p></div>That also falls under "your fault" if your not paying attention to signage.  You were PURPOSEFULLY not paying attention when the law requires you to do so.<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27643174</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:33:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642036</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : doesnt matter if its an accident or not, you still broke the law. start trying to apply the same rules to yourself. its really easy to tell people not to break the law and not apply it to yourself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642036</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:27:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642013</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Except its not wrong, its just labeled as wrong by people who make the laws in this country. Laws that make you a criminal for share stuff serves only the people who control the money and copyrights to other peoples work. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642013</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:26:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642476</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : If you fail to see a sign of a sign indicating a decreased speed, and you happen to get pulled over, its not speeding purposefully !! How many brain cells do you have !?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642476</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:50:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642379</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : Dude, someone speeding is not ACCIDENTAL it is done PURPOSEFULLY.  Again, care to explain how speeding is ACCIDENTAL?  It isn't...  even if you do it.<br><br>This is the argument that you made.  Just because it's totally flawed it still doesn't make it correct.<br><br>The ONLY person that mentioned copyright infringement was done ACCIDENTAL or PURPOSEFULLY... was YOU!  Do you see anyone besides you mentioning that?  Apparently I was paying attention however...  you were not!<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27642379</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 03:10:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27641727</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : Dude, reread the exchange involving other people. Someone accused me of breaking the Law ALL THE TIME. I said if I do, its ACCIDENTAL, as in, NOT PURPOSEFULLY DONE.<br><br> Are we on the same page now?<br><br>For someone to download illegal copies of music and movies, its done purposefully, not accidental. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27641727</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:42:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27641314</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : There is nothing <i>accidental</i> about going over the speed limit.  It's either you did or didn't.  How would that be accidental?  You weren't paying attention?  Your fault for not paying attention when the law requires you to do so.  <br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27641314</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:12:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27641239</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : When did I say I would not be breaking the law?, I said it was ACCIDENTAL. Do you browse the web and <i>accidently</i> download 500 songs and movies? <br><br>Stop putting a spin on one sentence, and try to read the entire conversation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27641239</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:48:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27640034</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/859676" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=859676');">ITALIAN926</a>:</said><p>If I dont see a sign, and go over the limit, thats on purpose? I dont know about your logic here buddy.<br> </p></div>I have spoken with not only police officers on this but lawyers and judges as well.  It falls under the category of "your fault" as ignorance of the law is not a qualified defence.<br><br>Yes your state has a law that says if you don't see a sign then they have a set speed limit you should be going under unsigned roadways.  You didn't follow it, you broke the law. ;)<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27640034</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:00:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27639067</link>
<description><![CDATA[ArrayList posted : not always.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27639067</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:15:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27638697</link>
<description><![CDATA[axus posted : Totally fair use.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27638697</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 03:54:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27638023</link>
<description><![CDATA[ArrayList posted : it's posted.... somewhere.<br><br>plus, just by browsing the web you are downloading tons of copyrighted stuff. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27638023</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:29:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637825</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : If I dont see a sign, and go over the limit, thats on purpose? I dont know about your logic here buddy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637825</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:34:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637701</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jim Kirk posted : If you are speeding, you're willfully breaking the law.  There is no "accidental".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637701</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:00:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637496</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted : Yea, Im breaking laws all the time, howd you guess. Any laws I break are accidental. eg, possibly speeding. I never willfully break the law like these people (you) do. Knowing something is wrong, and doing it anyway, is bullshit. <br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637496</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:06:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637467</link>
<description><![CDATA[elios posted : sure once the mega corps stop getting to write them]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637467</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:51:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637453</link>
<description><![CDATA[nothing00 posted : Not really.  I'm sure you're breaking laws all the time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637453</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:49:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637430</link>
<description><![CDATA[zed260 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1845274" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1845274');">bookertdub</a>:</said><p>Couldn't get around this by using VPN services (eg:Tunnelbear)?<br> </p></div>yes you can of course for now there go after vpns sooner or later but that will likely be a far bigger legal mess then anything ever done before]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637430</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:43:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637422</link>
<description><![CDATA[ITALIAN926 posted :  I have an even EASIER solution. Howz about not breaking the law? Its awfully simple. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637422</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:42:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637417</link>
<description><![CDATA[bookertdub posted : Couldn't get around this by using VPN services (eg:Tunnelbear)?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637417</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:40:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637400</link>
<description><![CDATA[cdru posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1175837" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1175837');">ArrayList</a>:</said><p>if you make it to the 6th strike you really suck at pirating stuff.<br> </p></div>Or just don't care.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637400</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:33:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not defending 6 strike policy, but</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637275</link>
<description><![CDATA[ArrayList posted : if you make it to the 6th strike you really suck at pirating stuff.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-defending-6-strike-policy-but-27637275</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:50:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
