dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
34
88615298 (banned)
join:2004-07-28
West Tenness

88615298 (banned) to marinemaster

Member

to marinemaster

Re: It's Sprint.......

Yep totally useless for my area. Why would walmart choose a company with the least coverage?
talz13
join:2006-03-15
Avon, OH

talz13

Member

walmart == cheapest everything
cramer
Premium Member
join:2007-04-10
Raleigh, NC

cramer to 88615298

Premium Member

to 88615298
They're choosing whomever will sell them a service at a low enough price. Verizon is big enough to not give a rats ass about MVNO/reseller deals.
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Austin, TX

iansltx to 88615298

Member

to 88615298
You think Verizon would sell access to its network at low enough rates to allow for that kind of plan? Over its dead, cold body.

For areas where Sprint works well/well enough (a fair chunk of the US...Sprint has more coverage than T-Mobile, for example), this plan is a good thing, though I won't be getting it since I already have a Sprint phone that can tether.

compuguybna
join:2009-06-17
Nashville, TN

compuguybna to 88615298

Member

to 88615298
You have Charter cable internet. why would you need a mobile broadband device?
said by 88615298:

Yep totally useless for my area. Why would walmart choose a company with the least coverage?

88615298 (banned)
join:2004-07-28
West Tenness

88615298 (banned)

Member

said by compuguybna:

You have Charter cable internet. why would you need a mobile broadband device?

said by 88615298:

Yep totally useless for my area. Why would walmart choose a company with the least coverage?

Go a few miles away like some friends of mine live where cable doesn't exist and TDS or at&t doesn't think DSL is worth deploying.