dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
15
share rss forum feed


88615298
Premium
join:2004-07-28
West Tenness
reply to marinemaster

Re: It's Sprint.......

Yep totally useless for my area. Why would walmart choose a company with the least coverage?


talz13

join:2006-03-15
Avon, OH

walmart == cheapest everything


cramer
Premium
join:2007-04-10
Raleigh, NC
kudos:9
reply to 88615298

They're choosing whomever will sell them a service at a low enough price. Verizon is big enough to not give a rats ass about MVNO/reseller deals.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Austin, TX
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
reply to 88615298

You think Verizon would sell access to its network at low enough rates to allow for that kind of plan? Over its dead, cold body.

For areas where Sprint works well/well enough (a fair chunk of the US...Sprint has more coverage than T-Mobile, for example), this plan is a good thing, though I won't be getting it since I already have a Sprint phone that can tether.



compuguybna

join:2009-06-17
Nashville, TN
Reviews:
·Millenicom
·HughesNet Satell..
·ooma
·Virgin Mobile Br..
·Charter
reply to 88615298

You have Charter cable internet. why would you need a mobile broadband device?

said by 88615298:

Yep totally useless for my area. Why would walmart choose a company with the least coverage?



88615298
Premium
join:2004-07-28
West Tenness

said by compuguybna:

You have Charter cable internet. why would you need a mobile broadband device?

said by 88615298:

Yep totally useless for my area. Why would walmart choose a company with the least coverage?

Go a few miles away like some friends of mine live where cable doesn't exist and TDS or at&t doesn't think DSL is worth deploying.