 mazhurgPremium join:2004-05-02 Portage La Prairie, MB 1 edit | The end of ####? - or CRTC orders telecom companies to open CRTC requires more transparency in rates for wholesale telecommunications services
»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r121026.htm
Once companies submit their costs and proposed rates to the CRTC, that information is made public. With this additional data, interested parties will be able to provide a more informed analysis. The cynic in me thinks we are going to go from ##### to cooked numbers, or meaningless data. |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | Re: The end of ####? yup! very sweet.. lets hope it translates into actual change -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
 eksterHi there. join:2010-07-16 Lachine, QC kudos:1 Reviews:
·FreePhoneLine
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to mazhurg They'll move from #### to a lot, a little, high, low, very high, very little? 
"Transit costs are very high, profit is very low. Shareholder payout is almost nothing. Upkeep expenses are even higher than very high. Markup can be low, but our costs are very high, so final tariffs should be even higher than very high. In summary, we need a lot more. " |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | LOL.. you know. that's probably exactly what will happen!
that would make for a great headline in the news though! The high is very high and the low hits us hard and we dont like it lots and so it's a very high bad. big boom, bada boom! bada big boom! -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
 GonePremium join:2011-01-24 Fort Erie, ON kudos:3 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
| Yeah, but even if they cook the numbers there are enough people out there who would be able to put two and two together and see through the bullshit. That, and cooking the numbers too badly could have a negative impact on share or put them into a bad competitive situation with other incumbents.
Considering that we now seem to be in an era where the CRTC has no issue laying an incumbent over their knee and providing them with a hard spanking, it's likely that if the numbers are cooked and don't pass the sniff test, the CRTC would be quick to call them on it, too. |
|
 elwoodbluesElwood BluesPremium join:2006-08-30 HarperLand | reply to mazhurg Fibic must be screaming. He can't lie anymore. |
|
 DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages join:2009-06-15 START&Cogeco kudos:6 | reply to mazhurg said by mazhurg:....The cynic in me thinks we are going to go from ##### to cooked numbers, or meaningless data. SH## !
What EVER will we rename B#ELL, if THAT comes to pass ???!!! 
= = = = = = =
On a related news item, I heard that Bell has hired The Swedish Chef to cook the numbers for them, Bork, Bork, Bork !!!  |
|
 hm @videotron.ca | reply to mazhurg While a little tiny bit more transparency is always good, and good for future fights and filings, does this open the door to past data in filings that were held in secret? Example, costs studies for UBB.
In some instances I think CNOC was allowed to see some data off public record, but I don't know how much.
So how will this affect current situations with filings (secret cost studies, ####) made a year or more ago? Anything?
Can CNOC, PIAC, Consumers Union, CIPPIC, or CAIP actually go back and demand values that were hidden to now be placed on public record? If so, will it change anything? |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | sometimes the values aren't necessary... seeing the logic of how they go about it is often all we need. -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
 eksterHi there. join:2010-07-16 Lachine, QC kudos:1 Reviews:
·FreePhoneLine
·TekSavvy DSL
| Their logic is obviously backwards.
They start with how much bonuses they need, then they calculate how much profit will result in those bonuses, then they calculate how much revenues they need to achieve that profit considering the general expenses, and with that, they finally figure out the costs of bits sold. Once they have that, they make the tariffs to stay 'profitable'! |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | LOL
I'm sure we'll get to see some *interesting* stuff! I'm thinking many things will have been double counted... that's the place I'm most keen to look at. Dry loops?? are you kiding me!? -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
|
|
 | reply to mazhurg said by mazhurg:http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r121026.htm
Once companies submit their costs and proposed rates to the CRTC, that information is made public. With this additional data, interested parties will be able to provide a more informed analysis. »www.itworldcanada.com/news/large···c/146318 Bill Sandiford, chairman of the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC), stated: extremely pro-competitive ruling that will ensure Canadians have access to better-priced Internet service from a variety of providers.
Since we have cost + mark-up, I don't see Bell, Rogers and Videotron gladly giving that info w/o a fight. If anything, I expect to see more collusion and more regulatory foot dragging with the telco's/cable-co's now in regards to justifying their costs.
Will be interesting to see the outcome of this, but I don't expect to see prices drop like CNOC is saying. At least not anything significant. |
|
 | Just wanted to add...
If we review the "new" CRTC's 3 year plan it seems they are really sticking to their guns. So far they did quite a bit.
See: »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/backgrnd/plan2012.htm
If we scroll down to the table titled, "Connect" we see they took care of the first phase of costing today. Seems the 2nd phase, "Review of methods used to establish wholesale prices" will take place next year and into the following year.
So if prices do get indeed get affected, we won't be seeing it, it seems, till 2014. At least that what it shows. |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | That's a good point.. I know I'm expecting something late this year or early next in the way of the proceedings that are under way. Usually they would set interim rates and then have the proper proceedings to set them over time... -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
 hm @videotron.ca | Well there is something else going on this year which seems in relation to this, not really sure. I've lost track of all these orders, decisions and whatnot from the CRTC. But anyhow, on the same "Connect" table we see near the end it states: "Applications Wholesale high-speed access services billing implementation" under the heading of 2012.
Seems to be in relation to this (best I can come up with): Billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-703.htm
So something is happening before the end of the year (unless I am just lost in all these filings now). |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | It's a rats nest to try to figure it all out.. You'd think there should be a better way..
I'm looking into it too. -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
 hm @videotron.ca | I don't really know to be honest. I'm starting to get lost on all this.
Someone make a flow chart of all these filings in review, in process, in privy council, in court, or to be re-reviewed. tgif |
|
 TSI MarcPremium,VIP join:2006-06-23 Chatham, ON kudos:14 | Lol yeah, you're driving me to drink!
...it's not so bad if you keep on top of it as it goes. Catching up is a bit of a pain. -- Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
 elwoodbluesElwood BluesPremium join:2006-08-30 HarperLand Reviews:
·Cybersurf Intern..
| said by TSI Marc:Lol yeah, you're driving me to drink!
...it's not so bad if you keep on top of it as it goes. Catching up is a bit of a pain. Liquor store has gotten a new brand of small batch bourbon in.
Yummmy -- No, I didn't. Honest... I ran out of gas. I... I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake....... |
|
 | reply to Gone said by Gone:Yeah, but even if they cook the numbers there are enough people out there who would be able to put two and two together and see through the bullshit. That, and cooking the numbers too badly could have a negative impact on share or put them into a bad competitive situation with other incumbents.
Considering that we now seem to be in an era where the CRTC has no issue laying an incumbent over their knee and providing them with a hard spanking, it's likely that if the numbers are cooked and don't pass the sniff test, the CRTC would be quick to call them on it, too. Any company issuing securities in the US has to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley. They HAVE to disclose lots of stuff truthfully & accurately, else their Dear Leader will have to watch out that he doesn't drop a bar of soap in the prison shower. I wonder how he'd Cope.
The information they have to file in the US in a prospectus or annual filings won't be Level II costing but there's a lot of stuff which can be used to figure things out. Ditto for analyst conference calls (also required to be truthful and reasonably accurate). |
|