<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: The end of ####?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Canadian Broadband&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662517</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:55 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689456</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : The setup is N+1 so it depends on how big the ISP is.. I'll assume 2 since that's the smallest installation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689456</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 06:37:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689412</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : I'm pretty sure its the same as has been described around the web...<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689412</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 05:19:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689408</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : How many servers are part of the cluster TSI received?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689408</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 05:11:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689387</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : We've had it installed for a number of weeks now... <br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27689387</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:21:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27688920</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Randomly changing the subject, whatever happened to netflix caching? They don't peer at TorIX, so you can't get in on that, but are you big enough to justify getting one of their hardware appliances?<br> </p></div>An ISP the size of TSI would have no problem meeting the requirements stated by Netflix but that still doesn't guarantee they'll receive the appliance just as meeting peering requirements doesn't guarantee a network will peer with you. I have a hard time believing TSI isn't receiving in excess of 10Gb of traffic from Netflix's CDN partners at the moment.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27688920</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####? - or CRTC orders telecom companies to open</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-or-CRTC-orders-telecom-companies-to-open-27688784</link>
<description><![CDATA[InvalidError posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1652067" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1652067');">MaynardKrebs</a>:</said><p>2) Powers of Investigation to be added to IC/CRTC mandate - includes audit teams capable of surprise technical inspections, power to demand technical information on-the-spot, power to remove equipment/records for study. </p></div>The "power to remove equipment" is largely pointless since the government's liabilities could greatly outweigh anything that may be gained from it and there are no reasons that could possibly justify going anywhere near that far for wholesale rate-setting purposes. The only things required are detailed network diagrams with equipment, cable and various other unit and linear costs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-or-CRTC-orders-telecom-companies-to-open-27688784</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:47:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27677566</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Randomly changing the subject, whatever happened to netflix caching? They don't peer at TorIX, so you can't get in on that, but are you big enough to justify getting one of their hardware appliances?<br> </p></div>Just double checked... We've had it installed for over a month now. Seems to work well.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27677566</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####? - or CRTC orders telecom companies to open</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-or-CRTC-orders-telecom-companies-to-open-27674394</link>
<description><![CDATA[MaynardKrebs posted : My posts<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,25642222?hilite=">Re: Bell Canada's financials and UBB</A><br><br>Re: Bell Canada's financials and UBB<br>What *is* galling about this is that Bell and all its officers have a legal responsibility to provide accurate information to the investing public (via the analysts) during these conference calls. There are financial and possible criminal sanctions for not doing so.<br><br>Yet these same cretins can stand before the CRTC and spout falsehood after falsehood without repercussions, or if there are possible repercussions that they are never enforced.<br><br>It's high time for all testimony before the CRTC to be sworn under oath, with severe penalties for false/misleading statements.<br><br>1) Corporate Death Penalty - ignore a CRTC ruling once, get fined $1mm/DAY; ignore the same or another ruling twice, get fined $10MM/DAY retroactive to the date of the first ruling; ignore a new or the same ruling a third time, the corporation's charter is cancelled and corporation is placed in receivership - shareholder's equity wiped out, corporation executives & directors placed on trial for contempt with all penalties payable personally.<br><br>2) Powers of Investigation to be added to IC/CRTC mandate - includes audit teams capable of surprise technical inspections, power to demand technical information on-the-spot, power to remove equipment/records for study. penalties for failure to comply are same as 1) above.<br><br>------------------------------------------<br><br>It's also Shaw being candid with investors and liars to the CRTC.<br><br>»www.shaw.ca/uploadedFiles/Corpor···inal.pdf (see link at top of page for working link to this document)<br><br>Slide #5 (numbers at lower left)<br>In the future, we believe our usage based billing plan will enable the further monetization of our Internet business as data usage becomes more prevalent and common amongst our customer base (ie. streaming of video)<br><br>Slide 19<br>Over-the-top applications (i.e. Global TV website, Hulu etc.) relating to the viewing of traditional broadcasting will become more common in the future and management of content will help mitigate this risk to our core business<br><br>Let's be clear in all this:<br>Monetizing / monetization are code words for "profit centre", and not "cost recovery" or "behaviour modification".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-or-CRTC-orders-telecom-companies-to-open-27674394</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:32:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27674294</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : Yeah Besson has good movies. I was watching Arthur series not long ago. Pretty good, was surprised they didn't do better.<br><br>Netflix caching.. Yeah for sure. I'll get details of where that's at.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27674294</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:03:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27673650</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1368600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368600');">TSI Marc</a>:</said><p>LOL that is a great line. I was watching it the other day.. it's on Netflix now.<br><br>Another movie with tons of a great lines is Fight club. some that can't really be repeated here hehe.<br> </p></div>I also re-watched it recently, it's a favourite. Well, I've liked most of the Luc Besson movies that I've seen, for that matter.<br><br>Randomly changing the subject, whatever happened to netflix caching? They don't peer at TorIX, so you can't get in on that, but are you big enough to justify getting one of their hardware appliances?<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27673650</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:08:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27672120</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : From, &raquo;<IMG  align=absmiddle style="vertical-align:middle;" TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/lock.png" border=0 width=16 height=16><A HREF="https://secure.dslreports.com/forum/r27672023-Jean-Pierre-Blais-s-speech-at-the-IIC"> Jean-Pierre Blais's speech at the IIC</A><br><br>CRTC Chair sez:<br><i>The rates we set are based on costing data filed with the CRTC by the incumbents, much of it on a confidential basis.<br><br>We have questioned the need for so much to be confidential. Last Friday, we issued new guidelines that will lead to more costing data being made available for public review and scrutiny. Once it&#146;s out in the open, it can be tested and challenged, which will make it much easier for us to set fair and reasonable rates, and will give all parties stronger grounds for trust in the result. This should cut down on the review-and-vary proceedings, which in the past have delayed access by Canadians to competitive services.</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27672120</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:31:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27671946</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by to add :</said><p>Just to add to the above...<br><br>If we look at the title of what's coming up at the "new" CRTC for 2013-2014:<br>"Review of methods used to establish wholesale prices"<br><br>It just makes sense to me.<br> </p></div>I think the R and Vs will be resolved as soon as possible, but that the CRTC does plan to hold a proceeding to figure out a different, simpler and less controversial way of setting wholesale rates. That's likely what that will end up being...<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27671946</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:25:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27671346</link>
<description><![CDATA[daeron posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1368600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368600');">TSI Marc</a>:</said><p>LOL that is a great line. I was watching it the other day.. it's on Netflix now.<br><br>Another movie with tons of a great lines is Fight club. some that can't really be repeated here hehe.<br> </p></div>Another goodie. Demolition man!<br>"You can take this job and you can shovel it!"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27671346</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:16:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27670936</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : LOL that is a great line. I was watching it the other day.. it's on Netflix now.<br><br>Another movie with tons of a great lines is Fight club. some that can't really be repeated here hehe.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27670936</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:47:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27670871</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1831823" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1831823');">daeron</a>:</said><p>Another fifth element fan! huzzah we do exist! I love that movie :)<br> </p></div>Soooo many good lines in that movie, my favourite is "Negative, I am a meat popsicle" (which I manage to fit into every day conversation perhaps a little too frequently) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27670871</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:30:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27670668</link>
<description><![CDATA[daeron posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1368600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368600');">TSI Marc</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/523161" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=523161');">Atticka</a>:</said><p>Milla Jovovich fan?<br> </p></div>LOL yeah, I was surprised nobody noticed sooner! Fifth element more than her but ya. Great movie.<br> </p></div>Another fifth element fan! huzzah we do exist! I love that movie :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27670668</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:44:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27669062</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/523161" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=523161');">Atticka</a>:</said><p>Milla Jovovich fan?<br> </p></div>LOL yeah, I was surprised nobody noticed sooner! Fifth element more than her but ya. Great movie.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27669062</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:14:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668350</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>Thanks! :)<br> </p></div>NP.<br>Just remember. No alcohol or sex a full week before the next CRTC fight ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668350</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:26:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668235</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : Thanks! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668235</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:35:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668053</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>You missed highlighting one. ;)<br> </p></div>We're all testing you to make sure you remain sharp and in shape.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668053</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:18:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668044</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : You missed highlighting one. ;)<br><br>"I'm hopeful we'll see rates that make sense, if not then I'd expect that the new policy would have to be used to add more transparency to a review."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27668044</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:08:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27667626</link>
<description><![CDATA[Davesnothere posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>Yes, absolutely. The second part of my quote was <i>"given the recent direction of the CRTC, I'd be surprised to not see some significant scrutiny of the numbers provided by the incumbents"</i>.<br><br><b>As the 703 file is closed and awaiting decision it would be out of process to ask for a change prior to the decision coming out.</b><br><br>I'm hopeful we'll see rates that make sense, if not then I'd expect that the new policy would have to be used to add more transparency to a review. The Commission asked some really good questions during the interrogatories, they're doing their homework, and <b>hopefully we'll see something more sustainable that everyone can work with without having to reopen this can of worms again.</b><br> </p></div>&nbsp;<br>But AFTER that decision has been pronounced, would not a further R&V be appropriate, particularly considering alleged concealment of cooked numbers by (at least) Bell ?<br><br>If Bell was not so corporately paranoid as to feel that they even NEEDED to file things in confidence in the first place, we also would never have needed such new rules as have now been seen coming down the pipe.<br><br>And as for cans of worms, my father used to say <b><i>"Once you open a can of worms, the only way to get them all back into the can is to use a BIGGER can."</i></b><br><br><small>--<br><br>We have only 2 things about which to worry :<br>(1) That things may never get back to normal<br>(2) That they already HAVE !<br>-<br><b>START Forum &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/cover,2941">Start Communications</A></b><br>Or you can still use Canadian Broadband.<br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27667626</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 03:07:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27666150</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Just to add to the above...<br><br>If we look at the title of what's coming up at the "new" CRTC for 2013-2014:<br>"Review of methods used to establish wholesale prices"<br><br>It just makes sense to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27666150</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:44:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27666158</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by hm :</said><p>I don't know. As some regulatory person I assume you are correct. ...<br>I mean, if the issue of rates come up, and it will in 2013, it's in your own best interest to think up creative ways as to why it needs to be on public record (doubt, double-dipping, or other), and you need to engage the public to support you.<br> </p></div>Yes, absolutely. The second part of my quote was <i>"given the recent direction of the CRTC, I'd be surprised to not see some significant scrutiny of the numbers provided by the incumbents"</i>. As the 703 file is closed and awaiting decision it would be out of process to ask for a change prior to the decision coming out. I'm hopeful we'll see rates that make sense, if not then I'd expect that the new policy would have to be used to add more transparency to a review. The Commission asked some really good questions during the interrogatories, they're doing their homework, and hopefully we'll see something more sustainable that everyone can work with without having to reopen this can of worms again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27666158</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:35:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27666100</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>While it has to adhere to the 'old' rules prior to the transparency victory today<br> </p></div>I don't know. As some regulatory person I assume you are correct. But, I was looking it over and reading different things about it and saw this quote pulled over @ cartt.ca:<br><br><i>&#147;The Commission notes that the rules with respect to the treatment and disclosure of confidential information are set out in sections 30 to 34 of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules of Procedure). The Commission considers that any disclosure requests will be guided by subsection 39(4) of the Act, based on evidence submitted by parties and using the disclosure guidelines set out in this decision as the basis for its determinations.&#148;</i><br><br>Seems to me that either you at CNOC, or PIAC, CIPPIC, Consumers Union, Vaxination (JF), or open Media (or others, including public comments of participation) need to make some claims in your next filings/war:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2010-277/page-7.html#h-16" >laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regu&middot;&middot;&middot;tml#h-16</A><br><br>Section 32 & 33 & 34: Public interest versus Direct harm:<br>Bell et al always cite "direct harm", never public interest.<br>(except for Rogers who claims the public is not interested, doesn't want to know, and data on public records should be expunged).<br><br>Tens of thousands of people submitting comments over the years is certainly public interest. No? Also the wild cost variance that occurred during wholesale costing is another.<br><br>Blais and the "new" CRTC have the balance in their hands. Up to you guys to try and convince him which way that balance needs to tilt.<br><br>I mean, if the issue of rates come up, and it will in 2013, it's in your own best interest to think up creative ways as to why it needs to be on public record (doubt, double-dipping, or other), and you need to engage the public to support you.<br><br>Seems to me you just need to open old wounds to get the ball going on opening the old grandfathered costing data. At least, that's what I understand from this "new" CRTC. Maybe that's why they are giving this phase 2 an entire year to complete, till 2014.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27666100</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665798</link>
<description><![CDATA[Davesnothere posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1652067" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1652067');">MaynardKrebs</a>:</said><p>....They HAVE to disclose lots of stuff truthfully & accurately, else their Dear Leader will have to watch out that he doesn't drop a bar of soap in the prison shower.<br><br>I wonder how he'd <b>COPE....</b><br> </p></div>&nbsp;<br><b>....with the SOAP ?!</b> :D<br><br>He'd prob'ly say something like "@#$%& !"<br><br>Which is quite different from "#####".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665798</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:06:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665196</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by hm :</said><p>Seems to be in relation to this (best I can come up with): Billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-703.htm" >www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-703.htm</A><br>So something is happening before the end of the year (unless I am just lost in all these filings now). </p></div>Yes, 2012-703 is the big one left. While it has to adhere to the 'old' rules prior to the transparency victory today, given the recent direction of the CRTC, I'd be surprised to not see some significant scrutiny of the numbers provided by the incumbents.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665196</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 01:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665169</link>
<description><![CDATA[Atticka posted : Milla Jovovich fan?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665169</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:28:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665132</link>
<description><![CDATA[MaynardKrebs posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1780183" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1780183');">Gone</a>:</said><p>Yeah, but even if they cook the numbers there are enough people out there who would be able to put two and two together and see through the bullshit.  That, and cooking the numbers too badly could have a negative impact on share or put them into a bad competitive situation with other incumbents.<br><br>Considering that we now seem to be in an era where the CRTC has no issue laying an incumbent over their knee and providing them with a hard spanking, it's likely that if the numbers are cooked and don't pass the sniff test, the CRTC would be quick to call them on it, too.<br> </p></div>Any company issuing securities in the US has to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley.  They HAVE to disclose lots of stuff truthfully & accurately, else their Dear Leader will have to watch out that he doesn't drop a bar of soap in the prison shower. I wonder how he'd Cope.<br><br>The information they have to file in the US in a prospectus or annual filings won't be Level II costing but there's a lot of stuff which can be used to figure things out.  Ditto for analyst conference calls (also required to be truthful and reasonably accurate).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27665132</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:03:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664910</link>
<description><![CDATA[elwoodblues posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1368600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368600');">TSI Marc</a>:</said><p>Lol yeah, you're driving me to drink!<br><br>...it's not so bad if you keep on top of it as it goes. Catching up is a bit of a pain.<br> </p></div>Liquor store has gotten a new brand of small batch bourbon in.<br><br>Yummmy<br><small>--<br><b>No, I didn't. Honest... I ran out of gas. I... I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake....... </b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664910</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:31:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664698</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : Lol yeah, you're driving me to drink!<br><br>...it's not so bad if you keep on top of it as it goes. Catching up is a bit of a pain.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664698</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:07:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664595</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I don't really know to be honest. I'm starting to get lost on all this.<br><br>Someone make a flow chart of all these filings in review, in process, in privy council, in court, or to be re-reviewed.  tgif]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664595</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:50:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664559</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : It's a rats nest to try to figure it all out.. You'd think there should be a better way..<br><br>I'm looking into it too.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664559</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:28:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664511</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Well there is something else going on this year which seems in relation to this, not really sure. I've lost track of all these orders, decisions and whatnot from the CRTC. But anyhow, on the same "Connect" table we see near the end it states:<br><i>"Applications<br>Wholesale high-speed access services billing implementation"</i> under the heading of 2012.<br><br>Seems to be in relation to this (best I can come up with):<br>Billing practices for wholesale residential high-speed access services<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-703.htm" >www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-703.htm</A><br><br>So something is happening before the end of the year (unless I am just lost in all these filings now).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664511</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:17:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664441</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : That's a good point.. I know I'm expecting something late this year or early next in the way of the proceedings that are under way. Usually they would set interim rates and then have the proper proceedings to set them over time...<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664441</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:51:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664312</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Just wanted to add...<br><br>If we review the "new" CRTC's 3 year plan it seems they are really sticking to their guns. So far they did quite a bit.<br><br>See:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/backgrnd/plan2012.htm" >www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/backgrnd/plan2012.htm</A><br><br>If we scroll down to the table titled, "Connect" we see they took care of the first phase of costing today. Seems the 2nd phase, "Review of methods used to establish wholesale prices" will take place next year and into the following year.<br><br>So if prices do get indeed get affected, we won't be seeing it, it seems, till 2014. At least that what it shows.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27664312</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:33:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663634</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1000066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1000066');">mazhurg</a>:</said><p>http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r121026.htm<br><br><blockquote>Once companies submit their costs and proposed rates to the CRTC, that information is made public. With this additional data, interested parties will be able to provide a more informed analysis.</blocKQUOTE> </p></div>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/large-carriers-lose-another-decision-at-crtc/146318" >www.itworldcanada.com/news/large&middot;&middot;&middot;c/146318</A><br>Bill Sandiford, chairman of the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC), stated: <i>&#147;extremely pro-competitive&#148; ruling that <u>will ensure Canadians have access to better-priced Internet service</u> from a variety of providers.</i><br><br>Since we have cost + mark-up, I don't see Bell, Rogers and Videotron gladly giving that info w/o a fight. If anything, I expect to see more collusion and more regulatory foot dragging with the telco's/cable-co's now in regards to justifying their costs.<br><br>Will be interesting to see the outcome of this, but I don't expect to see prices drop like CNOC is saying. At least not anything significant.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663634</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:01:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663787</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : LOL<br><br>I'm sure we'll get to see some *interesting* stuff! I'm thinking many things will have been double counted...  that's the place I'm most keen to look at. Dry loops?? are you kiding me!?<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663787</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:18:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663764</link>
<description><![CDATA[ekster posted : Their logic is obviously backwards.<br><br>They start with how much bonuses they need, then they calculate how much profit will result in those bonuses, then they calculate how much revenues they need to achieve that profit considering the general expenses, and with that, they finally figure out the costs of bits sold. Once they have that, they make the tariffs to stay 'profitable'!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663764</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:15:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663741</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : sometimes the values aren't necessary...  seeing the logic of how they go about it is often all we need.<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663741</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:10:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663450</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : While a little tiny bit more transparency is always good, and good for future fights and filings, does this open the door to past data in filings that were held in secret? Example, costs studies for UBB.<br><br>In some instances I think CNOC was allowed to see some data off public record, but I don't know how much.<br><br>So how will this affect current situations with filings (secret cost studies, ####) made a year or more ago? Anything?<br><br>Can CNOC, PIAC, Consumers Union, CIPPIC, or CAIP actually go back and demand values that were hidden to now be placed on public record? If so, will it change anything?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663450</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:57:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663235</link>
<description><![CDATA[Davesnothere posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1000066" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1000066');">mazhurg</a>:</said><p>....The cynic in me thinks we are going to go from ##### to cooked numbers, or meaningless data.<br> </p></div>&nbsp;<br><b>SH## !</b><br><br>What EVER will we rename B#ELL, if THAT comes to pass ???!!! :p<br><br>= = = = = = =<br><br>On a related news item, I heard that Bell has hired <b>The Swedish Chef</b> to cook the numbers for them, Bork, Bork, Bork !!! :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663235</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:28:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663160</link>
<description><![CDATA[elwoodblues posted : Fibic must be screaming. He can't lie anymore.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27663160</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662733</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gone posted : Yeah, but even if they cook the numbers there are enough people out there who would be able to put two and two together and see through the bullshit.  That, and cooking the numbers too badly could have a negative impact on share or put them into a bad competitive situation with other incumbents.<br><br>Considering that we now seem to be in an era where the CRTC has no issue laying an incumbent over their knee and providing them with a hard spanking, it's likely that if the numbers are cooked and don't pass the sniff test, the CRTC would be quick to call them on it, too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662733</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:29:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662662</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : LOL.. you know. that's probably exactly what will happen!<br><br>that would make for a great headline in the news though! The high is very high and the low hits us hard and we dont like it lots and so it's a very high bad. big boom, bada boom! bada big boom!<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662662</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:10:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662562</link>
<description><![CDATA[ekster posted : They'll move from #### to a lot, a little, high, low, very high, very little? :p<br><br>"Transit costs are very high, profit is very low. Shareholder payout is almost nothing. Upkeep expenses are even higher than very high.<br>Markup can be low, but our costs are very high, so final tariffs should be even higher than very high.<br>In summary, we need a lot more. "]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662562</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:49:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The end of ####?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662526</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Marc posted : yup! very sweet.. lets hope it translates into actual change<br><small>--<br>Marc - CEO/TekSavvy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-end-of-27662526</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:39:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The end of ####? - or CRTC orders telecom companies to open</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-end-of-or-CRTC-orders-telecom-companies-to-open-27662517</link>
<description><![CDATA[mazhurg posted : CRTC requires more transparency in rates for wholesale telecommunications services<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r121026.htm" >www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r121026.htm</A><br><br><blockquote>Once companies submit their costs and proposed rates to the CRTC, that information is made public. With this additional data, interested parties will be able to provide a more informed analysis.</blockquote><br><br>The cynic in me thinks we are going to go from ##### to cooked numbers, or meaningless data.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-end-of-or-CRTC-orders-telecom-companies-to-open-27662517</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:38:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
