<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Start Communications users forum&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682594</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:14:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:14:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27711915</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1624577" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1624577');">bt</a>:</said><p>Start will be in on the CNOC filing I expect.<br> </p></div>:) Indeed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27711915</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:03:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27711565</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/928810" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=928810');">brassy</a>:</said><p>So any updates?  Teksavvy seems to be posting on what they are doing (or plan on doing), what about start?<br> </p></div>Start will be in on the CNOC filing I expect.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27711565</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:51:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27711559</link>
<description><![CDATA[brassy posted : So any updates?  Teksavvy seems to be posting on what they are doing (or plan on doing), what about start?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27711559</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:49:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27709024</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : Just noticed Lease time is back to 7 days.<br><br>Remaining Lease Time	6 days, 23:51:57 :='/<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27709024</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:50:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708958</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : so, this means that we are not getting upgrades until crtc responds to this ? <br><br>O m G<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708958</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:21:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708857</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : +1]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708857</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:44:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708766</link>
<description><![CDATA[silvercat posted : I'm more confident with the new CRTC chair (Jean-Pierre Blais), that this bad dream will be over quicker than it would have been in the past.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708766</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:11:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708750</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : I really hope this is just <i>so</i> out of bounds that the CRTC is quick to enforce.<br><br>...what?  A man can dream.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708750</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:09:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708744</link>
<description><![CDATA[silvercat posted : From a post by TSI Marc (in the Teksavvy forum):<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27708702-">Re: New speeds Rogers cable - Teksavvy watch out</A><br><br>Does this Rogers crap never end ?<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1368600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368600');">TSI Marc</a>:</said><p>Looks like we're going to have to go to the CRTC.<br><br>On aggregated TPIA, they're giving the higher speeds along with a higher cost..  yet, their own users did not get a price change. This is not allowed.<br><br>For disaggregated, what we're on. They're saying we dont get the upgrades at all. Also not allowed.<br><br>CNOC submitted a Request for Enforcement of Speed-Matching Requirement earlier today.<br><br>*sigh*<br> </p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708744</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:07:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708093</link>
<description><![CDATA[yabos posted : Leave it to Robbers to find a loophole in order to screw us around.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27708093</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:54:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27706658</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>Unlike in the past when they have issued speed changes on their retail tiers which have flowed down to wholesale, this time they have decided to remove the old packages and introduce 'new' ones at higher prices.<br> </p></div>I somewhat get that for 150/10 and 6/0.25, as those have higher retail prices than the speeds they've replaced.<br><br>But I'll be interested to see their justification for doing that with the other tiers, with the retail pricing staying the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27706658</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:51:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705980</link>
<description><![CDATA[dan mackay posted : god damn it rogers, why did you have to go do that now :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705980</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:40:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705922</link>
<description><![CDATA[Teddy Boom posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>Unlike in the past when they have issued speed changes on their retail tiers which have flowed down to wholesale, this time they have decided to remove the old packages and introduce 'new' ones at higher prices. It's still early in the process, but we're on it and will continue to update as things progress.</p></div>So we are going to see a back and fourth similar to the one around the 3mbit to 6mbit upgrade, I guess? From the Teksavvy thread on that issue:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27554164-">Re: Lite goes from 3mbit/s to 6mbit/s for Rogers customers</A><br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1434918" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1434918');">Teddy Boom</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/818722" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=818722');">andyb</a>:</said><p>Who where what said anything was filed on the 15th? Nothing was filed on the tariff notices and I recieved zippo from any company about 2011-703/4 on the 15th or 16th<br> </p></div>An August 27th letter from Rogers:<blockquote>1. Rogers Communications Partnership (&#147;Rogers&#148;) herein files its reply comments associated with Rogers&#146; Tariff Notice 25 (&#147;TN 25&#148;) responding to comments received on August 9, 2012 from CNOC Inc.<br><br>2. CNOC proposes that the Commission not process Rogers TN 25 further until the Commission has rendered its determinations in the various Part I Applications to review and vary TRP 2011-703 (&#147;Part I Applications&#148;). CNOC submits that it would make sense for Rogers to file a cost study for 6 Mbps aggregated POI TPIA service only after the Commission has ruled on the various Part I Applications in order to eliminate the prospect of wasteful multiple cost studies.<br><br>3. Rogers agrees with CNOC that multiple cost studies would indeed be wasteful. Therefore, Rogers is amenable to maintaining the 6 Mbps rate filed in TN 25 on July 18th and approved on an interim basis in Telecom Order CRTC 2012-435 on an ongoing interim basis. After the final disposition of the Part I Applications, Rogers will file a revised tariff rate with supporting cost study. The rate that is ultimately approved by the Commission based on the cost study would then be made retro-active to October 1, 2012. October 1, 2012 is approximately the date at which a 6 Mbps tariff based on a revised cost study filed on <b>September 15, 2012</b> would typically have been approved on an interim basis.<br><br>4. This approach will avoid parties incurring the cost of multiple cost studies while according Rogers the same ability to recover its costs as if it had filed a revised tariff and supporting cost study on <b>September 15, 2012</b> as originally proposed in TN 25.<br><br>Yours very truly,<br>David Watt<br>Vice President<br>Regulatory Telecommunications<br>Copy: Interested</blockquote>Not sure I'm reading it right, I'm not normally the first one to interpret this stuff :)<br>(jfmezei, we need your crazy ass back here please!!!)<br> </p></div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://electronicsguru.ca/">electronicsguru.ca</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705922</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:03:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705878</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : It's too early to know yet, depends how the commission reacts. If there is an increase though, our existing customers will be able to stay on their current packages/pricing if they don't want to change.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705878</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:40:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705858</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : Do you think you will be increasing prices as well, or?<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705858</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:34:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705798</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : Just a quick update. <br><br>Unlike in the past when they have issued speed changes on their retail tiers which have flowed down to wholesale, this time they have decided to remove the old packages and introduce 'new' ones at higher prices. It's still early in the process, but we're on it and will continue to update as things progress.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27705798</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:10:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27704933</link>
<description><![CDATA[nirajshah7 posted : Cable Signal Details<br>Forward Path: <br>Channel	Frequency	Power	SNR	BER	Modulation<br>1	591.0 MHz	0.5 dBmV	38.6 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>2	597.0 MHz	0.2 dBmV	38.1 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>3	603.0 MHz	0.3 dBmV	37.8 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>4	609.0 MHz	0.2 dBmV	38.2 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>5	615.0 MHz	0.8 dBmV	38.2 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>6	621.0 MHz	1.0 dBmV	37.6 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>7	633.0 MHz	1.3 dBmV	37.2 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br>8	639.0 MHz	0.8 dBmV	37.5 dB	0.000 %	256 QAM<br><br>Return Path: <br>Channel ID	Frequency	Power	Modulation<br>3	22.1 MHz	34.0 dBmV	16 QAM<br>1	31.3 MHz	34.0 dBmV	16 QAM<br>2	25.3 MHz	34.0 dBmV	16 QAM<br>4	38.6 MHz	35.5 dBmV	16 QAM<br><br>Guys... is my signal level good for 3 mbps upload :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27704933</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:11:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27704070</link>
<description><![CDATA[zacsaunders posted : Do we need the 64QAM for the higher speeds...?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27704070</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:33:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703249</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gone posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1624577" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1624577');">bt</a>:</said><p>Likely a handful of new condos where they installed FTTH then converted to coax on-premises, like TrailWest in Ottawa.</p></div>Cogeco and Shaw already have a whole shitload of direct fibre to the home in new developments, to which they convert at the home and otherwise have it function the same way as everyone else's coax.  Removing that step and going directly to fibre isn't hard to do.  I suspect that there might be more of this out there in Rogersland than one would suspect, particularly since they took over Futureway who were the first to do this 10-15 years ago.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703249</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:24:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703202</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : I don't think i am going to see this upgrade any time soon, my upstream modulation is still 16QAM.<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703202</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:12:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703143</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1780183" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1780183');">Gone</a>:</said><p>Former FutureWay areas?<br> </p></div>Likely a handful of new condos where they installed FTTH then converted to coax on-premises, like TrailWest in Ottawa.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703143</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:57:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703105</link>
<description><![CDATA[brassy posted : how about the 30/10 plan with 500 gb quota only available out East.  :huh:<br><br>Guess when there is some semblance of competition, Rogers can actually have something half descent.  Of course that will never happen in Ontario.  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27703105</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:49:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27702968</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gone posted : Former FutureWay areas?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27702968</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:22:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27702959</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted :  <IMG SRC="http://www.urimage.net/images/2012/11/07/1ofa6.png"> <br><br>Yep ! :D ... r we all getting this?:P :) <br><br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27702959</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:20:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27702895</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : Well, the <i>retail</i> details are official and live on the Rogers website.  Hopefully the TPIA details aren't far behind!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27702895</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:09:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27701079</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : Waiting for the official details still. As soon as we know I'll update here. Thanks. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27701079</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:57:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699963</link>
<description><![CDATA[Teddy Boom posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1595726" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1595726');">nirajshah7</a>:</said><p>As per this thread.. changes to speeds are starting from Nov 7.. when will we get this on Start?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27695927-Rogers-Interenet-Speed-Upgrade.-It-is-official-now">Rogers Interenet Speed Upgrade... It is official now...</A>.</p></div>We don't know. What we do know:<br><br>Speed matching: The CRTC has ruled that Rogers must offer speed matching to the small companies. Rogers cooperates with that ruling. However, they get to delay, and they play other shenanigans like giving some TPIA providers  access to all packages while restricting access to slower packages for other TPIA providers.<br><br>TPIA choice: The provider (aka TPIA, aka Start, Teksavvy, Distributel, and maybe CIK) can choose not to be upgraded. For example, Teksavvy has chosen not to automatically upgrade all 3mbit customers to the new 6mbit service, and I believe that Distributel decided not to accept the 12/24 mbit upgrades for a few months after it became available to them.<br><br>It would be great to have any more information than we currently have! :D<br><br>(for example, how does the TPIA choice thing actually work on the ground?)<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://electronicsguru.ca/">electronicsguru.ca</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699963</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:07:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699246</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : I don't think that is available.<br><br>It would be 10 km long list :P<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699246</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:11:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699245</link>
<description><![CDATA[nirajshah7 posted : Does Rogers have schedule of what area is upgraded when?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699245</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:11:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699242</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1595726" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1595726');">nirajshah7</a>:</said><p>As per this thread.. changes to speeds are starting from Nov 7.. when will we get this on Start?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27695927-Rogers-Interenet-Speed-Upgrade.-It-is-official-now">Rogers Interenet Speed Upgrade... It is official now...</A>.<br> </p></div>How i see it, if rogers upgrade the area where you at, you will get new speeds right away.<br><br>Start doesn't have to do anything (nor they can i think)<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:10:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699215</link>
<description><![CDATA[nirajshah7 posted : As per this thread.. changes to speeds are starting from Nov 7.. when will we get this on Start?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27695927-Rogers-Interenet-Speed-Upgrade.-It-is-official-now">Rogers Interenet Speed Upgrade... It is official now...</A>.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27699215</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:02:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27696463</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted :  Should be fine, depends on the node, if there are problems we can work to investigate. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27696463</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:32:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27695233</link>
<description><![CDATA[bestjsg posted : anyone, any ideas ?  thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27695233</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:05:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27690027</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : Only if Rogers does first.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27690027</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:47:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687959</link>
<description><![CDATA[zacsaunders posted : I guess I should have re-worded what I was asking, Would it be possible for them to use the 10mbps upload on ALL their packages?<br>(I know they won't do that but is it technically possible?) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687959</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687607</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : Start is limited to the speed profiles offered by Rogers (or Cogeco, or Bell, as the case may be).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687607</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:21:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687571</link>
<description><![CDATA[zacsaunders posted : Just curious, does start have to follow the same speeds as rogers? or  do they make their own? for example rogers network (in some areas) has 10mbps upload, could start throw that 10 up onto any one of their packages?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687571</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:09:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687202</link>
<description><![CDATA[jasmo34 posted : DSL's 800K and 1M uploads just became a lot less important.<br><br>I'm surprised Rogers didn't sneak an upload increase into the 6M plan, just to pound on DSL a little more. Like maybe up to a true 768K, or 1M. Or maybe 801K, just to make their marketing people happy (beating the DSL 800K)! Maybe they will yet.<br><br>Hmmm... A relative of mine bought an SB5101N, a Docsis 2 modem, 11 months ago for use with ACANAC's originally 12M  cable plan. Then he ran into various excuses from them for not getting service, then finally their official  stop-sell (here in London). Then he ran into his own 'financial shortfall'. That modem, that's never been activated, is looking more and more like a fancy doorstop!  :huh:  <br><br>He won't get top performance out of that, in primetime, on 25/2, will he?<br><br>Maybe I'll buy it from him for $20, and use it on a 6M Cable plan.<br><br>edits: ..... nice simple "S" icon for the website, Rocca; better than the blank square! .....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27687202</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:36:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27685896</link>
<description><![CDATA[MichelR posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1780183" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1780183');">Gone</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1501267" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1501267');">silvercat</a>:</said><p>It's interesting, but after changing from 10 mbit/sec Cogeco Business to 30/2 Start package, i don't see my bandwidth consumption going up -- just things download a lot quicker.</p></div>This is usually the case for most people - usage either only very slightly increases, or stays the same.<br> </p></div>That's what I've been trying to make people understand for years.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27685896</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:55:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27685679</link>
<description><![CDATA[bestjsg posted : So I just started with Start last week with 18m/512k and since I wasn't sure if cable internet is really for me /my area,  I opted to rent the modem and I have received a D2 modem,  so when the upgrade hits,  is the D2 modem still good for the new speed?  Any suggestions? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27685679</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:56:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684572</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gone posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1501267" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1501267');">silvercat</a>:</said><p>It's interesting, but after changing from 10 mbit/sec Cogeco Business to 30/2 Start package, i don't see my bandwidth consumption going up -- just things download a lot quicker.</p></div>This is usually the case for most people - usage either only very slightly increases, or stays the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684572</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:46:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684467</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : For many people the speeds of 18/28/32 are all irrelevant (all of them are 'fast') and it's been about the usage component.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684467</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:12:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684454</link>
<description><![CDATA[dan mackay posted : well, like I said in the rogers forum, these bumps in speed make the 32 package less useless (larger then 4 Mbit speed difference)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684454</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:07:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684436</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/816260" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=816260');">damir</a>:</said><p>Will the bandwidth cap stay the same on current 32\1 package? 400 GB </p></div>Yes, cost still the same too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684436</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:03:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684058</link>
<description><![CDATA[silvercat posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/816260" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=816260');">damir</a>:</said><p>Will the bandwidth cap stay the same on current 32\1 package? 400 GB<br><br>Thanks<br> </p></div>It's interesting, but after changing from 10 mbit/sec Cogeco Business to 30/2 Start package, i don't see my bandwidth consumption going up -- just things download a lot quicker.  But that doesn't mean that the bandwidth cap <i>shouldn't</i> be increased.  Maybe might have to wait for the CRTC to mandate lower wholesale prices.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27684058</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:53:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27683678</link>
<description><![CDATA[damir posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1596693" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1596693');">rocca</a>:</said><p>Yes I suspect so, we have not received official word yet but the package changes will flow out to us as well.<br> </p></div>Will the bandwidth cap stay the same on current 32\1 package? 400 GB<br><br>Thanks<br><small>--<br>www.urimage.net - Free Image Hosting</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27683678</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:51:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27683482</link>
<description><![CDATA[Teddy Boom posted : Big cost implications with those changes, yikes! And those poor DCM425s are looking less attractive now that Docsis 2 isn't so appropriate for Express :(<br><br>There is a gaping hole between 6mbit/256kbit and 25mbit/2mbit!<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://electronicsguru.ca/">electronicsguru.ca</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27683482</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:12:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682888</link>
<description><![CDATA[rocca posted : Yes I suspect so, we have not received official word yet but the package changes will flow out to us as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682888</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:38:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682806</link>
<description><![CDATA[bt posted : Also curious, as I might need a new modem to take advantage of it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682806</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:16:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Speed bump in Rogers Areas?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682594</link>
<description><![CDATA[daeron posted : Will this have an impact on speeds offered by Start?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27681779-Extreme-Plus-New-Speeds-Effective-December-1st">[Extreme Plus] New Speeds Effective December 1st</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Speed-bump-in-Rogers-Areas-27682594</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:27:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
