<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Intersting&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27683705</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:16:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:16:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Intersting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27685695</link>
<description><![CDATA[openbox9 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/216677" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=216677');">8744675</a>:</said><p>Even more interesting is that it only costs 13 cents per GB to store data indefinitely, which consumes resources as long as it's stored</p></div>Isn't that $0.13/mth, not indefinitely?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27685695</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 01:08:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Intersting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27685689</link>
<description><![CDATA[Oh_No posted : Or just setup a shared drive at your home internet connection, then you have actual privacy for your data.<br>The workers for these online storage companies must have hours of fun go through files of their customers.<br><br>As for google drive and other online storage, I lol.<br>Very expensive yearly prices.<br>Google is $120 a year for 200GB. That is more than what XM radio costs.<br><br>I could see like $10 a year, but $10 a month is crazy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27685689</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 01:03:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Intersting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27684756</link>
<description><![CDATA[DataRiker posted : Great point.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27684756</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:57:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Intersting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27684189</link>
<description><![CDATA[8744675 posted : Even more interesting is that it only costs 13 cents per GB to store data indefinitely, which consumes resources as long as it's stored, but it costs $10 a GB to transmit it there, which only uses resources momentarily during transmission. <br><br>Doesn't make sense.  I bet the FCC will become very interested if they don't count that data against your cap. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Intersting-27684189</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:21:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Intersting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Intersting-27683705</link>
<description><![CDATA[JigglyWiggly posted : why not just get google drive for 10$]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Intersting-27683705</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:56:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
