| reply to battleop
Re: Cheapest GIGABIT colo? said by battleop:One of which is probably to get around the law..
Huh?
A smart Canadian business would host here to avoid the precipitous actions of US authorities, the expense of any actions in the US, and might be prohibited by stature or professional best practices from hosting outside Canadian jurisdiction. |
|
| A smart Canadian business would not look for colo braised solely on price. |
|
brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON | said by battleop:A smart Canadian business would not look for colo braised solely on price.
That's your assumption. |
|
| reply to battleop
its a redundant backup server so it will most likely never be used thats why cheap is the key word |
|
| "it will most likely never be used"
Ask companies in the north east about how that plan of action works out.
--
I do not, have not, and will not work for AT&T/Comcast/Verizon/Charter or similar sized company. |
|
 GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
kudos:20 | The difference is that companies like CallCentric and Gawker didn't HAVE a backup server, let alone one on a cheap transit provider.
In Gawker's case, they just deserve any hardship caused (a company who gets 100% of their revenue from their website has no backups from their website). Companies like CallCentric should be the subject of massive lawsuits for gross incompetence. They didn't even have backup POWER, they should never have been allowed to operate a telephone company like that, but sadly there's no regulation against complete idiots running a telephone company.
--
Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc »fixppp.org |
|
|
|
| reply to battleop
REDUNDANT BACKUP! You don't need to be so cocky, It is a backup of a backup so its an N+1 type of setup it is much lower capacity than the main backup |
|
 dillyhammerA. Good. Start.Premium,MVM
join:2010-01-09
Hamilton, ON
kudos:9
 ·Start Communicat..
 ·Cogeco Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
·Caneris
| reply to Guspaz
said by Guspaz:there's no regulation against complete idiots running a telephone company.
Mike |
|
 El QuintronResident Mouth BreatherPremium
join:2008-04-28
Etobicoke, ON
kudos:2
·TekSavvy DSL
 ·WIND Mobile
 ·voip.ms
| said by dillyhammer:said by Guspaz:there's no regulation against complete idiots running a telephone company.
Mike Post of the day.
--
Support Bacteria -- It's the Only Culture Some People Have |
|
| reply to dillyhammer
said by dillyhammer:said by Guspaz:there's no regulation against complete idiots running a telephone company.
BELL CANADA there fixed it for ya LOL |
|
| reply to Guspaz
said by Guspaz:They didn't even have backup POWER, they should never have been allowed to operate a telephone company like that, but sadly there's no regulation against complete idiots running a telephone company. Depends on what type of telephone company you are talking about. With POTS classified as an essential service, I doubt anyone selling POTS or legally POTS-equivalent services in Canada would get away with that.
CallCentric, FPL, voip.ms, etc. are VoIP sold with few to no service guarantees since your service can get disrupted by multiple factors beyond the VoIP provider's control. Many ISPs that offer bundled and internally supported VoIP only (fully) support their VoIP service when used with ISP-provided router and ATA so they can remotely manage and troubleshoot the devices. |
|
 OinktasticLet them use fibre
join:2005-08-24
Scarborough
kudos:2
·localphone.com
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to eeeaddict
said by eeeaddict:REDUNDANT BACKUP! You don't need to be so cocky, It is a backup of a backup so its an N+1 type of setup it is much lower capacity than the main backup
If it's a backup of a backup, do you really need gigabit access, or can it be more of a trickle service at 10 or 100Mbit? |
|
