<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Laughing it off&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27702806</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:58:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:58:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27706629</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chubbysumo posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by readurtos :</said><p>if att raises the rates to recoup, people will be able to drop them with no ETF, it's in you contract that you can ditch if there is a rate increase. people need to read contracts before signing them<br> </p></div>They actually pulled that little sentence out ages ago.  Also, just a reminder, but AT&T can and does change the ToS at will, any time they want, without notice to the customer.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27706629</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:44:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27704794</link>
<description><![CDATA[Netbum posted : I already did,was with that company,or whatever it was going back to 1994.<br>They care not for customer loyalty.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27704794</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:32:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703740</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : if att raises the rates to recoup, people will be able to drop them with no ETF, it's in you contract that you can ditch if there is a rate increase. people need to read contracts before signing them]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703740</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:37:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703550</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cthen posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1048555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1048555');">BF69</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/295948" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=295948');">ropeguru</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/216197" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=216197');">dnoyeB</a>:</said><p>$700,000 plus refunds.<br> </p></div>Plus now a rate increase to recoup there money.<br> </p></div>And then those people will move on to another company.<br> </p></div>Not with a contract they won't.  Do you really believe there are enough people not under a contract that it will make a difference if they leave?  Then only under certain promotions made at certain times will the other carriers pay an ETF to gain customers.  So that is out the window too.<br><br>Yet again AT&T will not have to actually cover their own cost for their own actions.<br><small>--<br>"I like to refer to myself as an Adult Film Efficienato." - Stuart Bondek</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703550</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:31:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703040</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Agreed, but the FCC isn't going to make that happen, it's too reasonable and consumer friendly. With ATT billing practices of adding on additional charges EVERY month, that 25-30 dollar credit will get eaten up rather quickly and in the end the customer is paying more for less than it was paying-ATT gets their way and kills off the grand-fathered accounts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703040</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:25:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703135</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/295948" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=295948');">ropeguru</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/216197" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=216197');">dnoyeB</a>:</said><p>$700,000 plus refunds.<br> </p></div>Plus now a rate increase to recoup there money.<br> </p></div>And then those people will move on to another company.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703135</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:56:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703120</link>
<description><![CDATA[rradina posted : Surely you jest.  Didn't AT&T always claim that their data limits were tuned to meet the needs of an overwhelming majority of users.  Didn't they claim that only a small percentage would pay more as a result of their new limits?  If what AT&T said is true, how can this be a windfall?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703120</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:52:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703054</link>
<description><![CDATA[ropeguru posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/216197" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=216197');">dnoyeB</a>:</said><p>$700,000 plus refunds.<br> </p></div>Plus now a rate increase to recoup there money.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703054</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:40:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703026</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1765087" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1765087');">IowaCowboy</a>:</said><p>They should have also been forced to let affected users reinstate their unlimited data plans. <br> </p></div>The move is to get rid of unlimited and that's not going to change. let them back for what 6 months, a year, maybe 2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703026</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:32:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703022</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/216197" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=216197');">dnoyeB</a>:</said><p>$700,000 plus refunds.<br> </p></div>True but $700,000 to the government might as well be $5. The refunds are what's going to hurt at&t more.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703022</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:32:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703005</link>
<description><![CDATA[IowaCowboy posted : They should have also been forced to let affected users reinstate their unlimited data plans. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27703005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27702994</link>
<description><![CDATA[dnoyeB posted : $700,000 plus refunds.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27702994</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:27:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27702820</link>
<description><![CDATA[winsyrstrife posted : Exactly...is $700,000 even a factor compared to the numbers of users moved to metered data plans who will incur overages?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Laughing-it-off-27702820</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:53:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Laughing it off</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Laughing-it-off-27702806</link>
<description><![CDATA[spewak posted : Att will laugh it off and everyone will be put on their expensive family share plan and Att will laugh some more, hell, all the way to the bank.<br><small>--<br><br>Romney equals Epic Fail!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Laughing-it-off-27702806</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:49:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
