republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
36
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
kudos:6
Host:
Wireless Networking
All Things Unix
Cox HSI
Efficient
Southwest Chat

A User Perspective

As a current or potential user of all of the devices in question, why would I give priority to a radio station over 802.11b? I'm not trying to debate the licensed vs. unlicensed issue or any legalities. The example used in the article was that of a car radio and the potential for interference from, say, a WISP. I lose my AM news station when I drive under a bridge, for crying out loud! The NPR station I prefer does not come through in all of the areas where I drive. It's the nature of the beast.

On the other hand, if I were to lose my broadband frequently or be asked to give up half or more of the bandwidth - a likely result of a power cut - I'd get pretty excited. If I lose my car radio when I drive by a commercial campus where a WLAN is in use, so what? I love my DirecTV, but do I really need satellite radio anyway? Again, just a user's view of it.
--
Surf Without Strings

Nighttime5

join:2001-11-30

Yes the FCC loves to do the rug pulling action esp with a company helping.

Love the grab of some of the Ham Band's frequencies to fill the needs for companies like UPS etc.

Wont get into the HDTV mess they have created. And it looks like it still on for 06!

802.11a would be better since it has the speed "when" you turn on the security stuff. "b" is a slow dog when you activate the security layer. Just wish the "a" was cheaper than 4x of a wired LAN.


Monday, 04-Jun 18:43:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics