| reply to LostTheGame
Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers What does this mean if anything if I'm on Distributel?
At school crazy busy sorry can't log into my official account!
Please & thanks in advance! :P!  ! Cheers! |
|
 TOPDAWGPremium
join:2005-04-27
Midland, ON
kudos:3 | reply to aaah
hm so this stuff means what? |
|
|
|
| reply to aaah
I guess I'm stuck with my 512kbs upload speed then. |
|
bt
join:2009-02-26
canada
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·Start Communicat..
| reply to HiVolt
said by HiVolt:said by resa1983:Rogers is now forced to file all optional speeds (and provide to wholesale), as well as file all future tariffs with upstream speeds included, so they can't pull this nonsense again.
What they also should be forced to do is file new tariffs ahead of their own speed upgrades, so when they release their upgrades, TPIA ISP's don't have to wait months for the tariffs to be approved. quote:
Where a cost study has not been provided, rates for WHSA services at an existing lower speed would provide an appropriate interim rate for the new service speed.
|
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17
 ·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:Rogers is now forced to file all optional speeds (and provide to wholesale), as well as file all future tariffs with upstream speeds included, so they can't pull this nonsense again.
What they also should be forced to do is file new tariffs ahead of their own speed upgrades, so when they release their upgrades, TPIA ISP's don't have to wait months for the tariffs to be approved.
--
F**K THE NHL. Go Blue Jays 2013!!!
|
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to bt
said by bt:Requiring access to optional higher upload speeds (ie: 45/7 instead of 45/4): Approved (aggregated only, where available to retail customers)
Very glad to note that they took my comments on 45/7 into account.
Rogers is now forced to file all optional speeds (and provide to wholesale), as well as file all future tariffs with upstream speeds included, so they can't pull this nonsense again.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
bt
join:2009-02-26
canada
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
| reply to aaah
Decision is in:
»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2013/2013-36.htm
Speed matching for non-aggregate: Denied
Not allowing a wholesale price increase for higher speeds if there's no retail price increase: Denied (but any cost increases do have to be based on a costing analysis)
Requiring access to optional higher upload speeds (ie: 45/7 instead of 45/4): Approved (aggregated only, where available to retail customers) |
|
| reply to nupogodi
Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers Dude, DSLreports isn't Facebook. |
|
| reply to nupogodi
Dude, this isn't Facebook. |
|
| reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:said by rocca:Doh. Caffeine deficiency.
Doesn't help that this UBB/AVP/CBB decision has dragged on for years now, and encompasses multiple threads based on Decisions, interim, R&V, etc. Just reading that paragraph w/o a coffee I.V. causes dizziness. If you take a couple of weeks break from these diff filings one gets confused as to what is what.
It seems I started this topic under the name of "aaah", and I don't even recall what it's about anymore. Maybe I knew it would cause me to drool at some point in time while I say "aaah".
Back to the coffee... |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to rocca
said by rocca:Doh. Caffeine deficiency.
Too many similar threads imo.
Doesn't help that this UBB/AVP/CBB decision has dragged on for years now, and encompasses multiple threads based on Decisions, interim, R&V, etc.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
 roccaStart.caPremium
join:2008-11-16
London, ON
kudos:11 | reply to resa1983
Doh. Caffeine deficiency. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to rocca
said by rocca:That's for speed matching on disaggregated, still very important but not the 'big one' on capacity rates that we're waiting for.
Thats the decision this thread is about. 
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
roccaStart.caPremium
join:2008-11-16
London, ON
kudos:11 | reply to LostTheGame
That's for speed matching on disaggregated, still very important but not the 'big one' on capacity rates that we're waiting for. |
|
| reply to resa1983
This week!
»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/decisions.htm |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to nupogodi
said by nupogodi:So... when are we going to hear some more about this? Are we just stuck waiting on CRTC or what?
Waiting on CRTC, yes.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
bt
join:2009-02-26
canada
kudos:1 | reply to nupogodi
said by nupogodi:Are we just stuck waiting on CRTC or what?
Basically, yeah. |
|
 nupogodiPremium
join:2012-07-10
Toronto, ON | reply to aaah
So... when are we going to hear some more about this? Are we just stuck waiting on CRTC or what? |
|
brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON
1 edit | reply to HiVolt
said by HiVolt:[
LOL... JF's a bright guy
His posts seem to be so 50/50 on here. Maybe he is trying to fool people on here. |
|
