dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
17
share rss forum feed


hm

@videotron.ca
reply to aaah

Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers

CNOC makes reference to some 2006 Speed match policy (»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2006/···6-77.htm), but wasn't this also ordered in the 2010 speed match fight?

Wasn't there policy created by all the filings from 2009 to 2010? Particularly this one »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-632.htm which was started by cybersurf in 2008 after they went tits up and sold to distributel?

Does the above not apply to cable as well? Seems it does. So why does CNOC reference a 2006 policy instead of a policy most all of it's members were already party to?

Also, instead of starting a new proceeding which will now be delayed, why didn't they file in Rogers new tariffs/speeds that they filed like over a week ago?

/Rant on: F&S I hate the CRTC website. I loose my marbles trying to find stuff and navigating that site. Need a gallon of coffee now after finding that one link above. Hope anonymous nukes them one day just for having an anal website. /rant off

Anyhow, seems this is open for public comment. Who is going to submit their comments? You have till Dec 10th.



hm

@videotron.ca

Click for full size
downloadVaxination.pdf 573,037 bytes
Speed Match Filing
JF's (Vaxinations) submission to the CRTC.

Haven't read it yet.

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10

Not JF's best work unfortunately.

I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP



elwoodblues
Elwood Blues
Premium
join:2006-08-30
Somewhere in
kudos:2
Reviews:
·VMedia

said by resa1983:

Not JF's best work unfortunately.

I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.

He tends to be too flippant in his submissions.


HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:21
reply to resa1983

I'm surprised JF is still doing this...



hm

@videotron.ca
reply to elwoodblues

heh his comment on "marketing" made me chuckle.


MaynardKrebs
Heave Steve, for the good of the country
Premium
join:2009-06-17
kudos:4
reply to elwoodblues

said by elwoodblues:

said by resa1983:

Not JF's best work unfortunately.

I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.

He tends to be too flippant in his submissions.

It's perfectly adequate for the issue at-hand.
If Blais' "consumer focus" is to be believed, then JF's submission presents the matter in a very consumer-like manner that even Pentefountas should be able to understand.


hm

@videotron.ca

This is all a game anyhow since Rogers knows the upcoming wholesale costing revision is going to lead to price changes.

Also makes me wonder how many people would need to upgrade to a doc-3 modem? Out of that, how many are new to TPIA providers and just bought their doc-2 modem which is now no good? Will resellers swap them out with just a price difference for these new customers?

Is there anyone here that would have to swap modems?



mlerner
Premium
join:2000-11-25
Nepean, ON
kudos:5
reply to HiVolt

said by HiVolt:

I'm surprised JF is still doing this...

He apparently got nothing else to do except attend ISP and regulatory events or ride his bike to Timbuktu. Either way, his submissions are entertaining and aren't hurting anyone.

Vomio

join:2008-04-01
Reviews:
·odynet

+1

I think JF changed the timetable and marching plans of both sides with his actions and he definitely got exposure for the logic of things from the citizens perspective, something that probably would not have happened otherwise.

I wish he'd overcome his differences with DSLR, I think in some ways this is a better forum for him than Twitter.



Shrug

@videotron.ca

said by Vomio:

I think in some ways this is a better forum for him than Twitter.

Maybe he's on a diff forum? This isn't the only one...

Vomio

join:2008-04-01

Could be, there is the rest of the internet.

I think the only place my browsing has crossed paths with him posting recently is Twitter, but then again I don't have much reason to go on a JF hunt.


resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10

1 recommendation

Knock it off guys. Lets keep this about CNOC vs Rogers, and not about how you guys think about JF. Its disrespectful, especially as he's busted his ass for years in his filings trying to make things better for all of us.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP



U Go Girl

@videotron.ca

said by resa1983:

Knock it off guys. Lets keep this about CNOC vs Rogers, and not about how you guys think about JF. Its disrespectful, especially as he's busted his ass for years in his filings trying to make things better for all of us.

+1


to add

@videotron.ca
reply to resa1983

said by resa1983:

Knock it off guys. Lets keep this about CNOC vs Rogers, and not about how you guys think about JF. Its disrespectful, especially as he's busted his ass for years in his filings trying to make things better for all of us.

If I may interject here... Just wanted to add...

It's people & CNOC versus Rogers.

JF represents a lot of people (like the Quebec consumers union or PIAC or CIPPIC).

CNOC, as per their mandate, represents the resale business and their business interests. Thus the reason why JF is an important factor in all this. He brings all the question and rants we have on the table in plain language and doesn't represent business interests (like how CNOC member distributel was all for UBB, as an example).