 hm
@videotron.ca | reply to aaah
Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers CNOC makes reference to some 2006 Speed match policy (»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2006/···6-77.htm), but wasn't this also ordered in the 2010 speed match fight?
Wasn't there policy created by all the filings from 2009 to 2010? Particularly this one »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-632.htm which was started by cybersurf in 2008 after they went tits up and sold to distributel?
Does the above not apply to cable as well? Seems it does. So why does CNOC reference a 2006 policy instead of a policy most all of it's members were already party to?
Also, instead of starting a new proceeding which will now be delayed, why didn't they file in Rogers new tariffs/speeds that they filed like over a week ago?
/Rant on: F&S I hate the CRTC website. I loose my marbles trying to find stuff and navigating that site. Need a gallon of coffee now after finding that one link above. Hope anonymous nukes them one day just for having an anal website. /rant off
Anyhow, seems this is open for public comment. Who is going to submit their comments? You have till Dec 10th. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | JF's (Vaxinations) submission to the CRTC.
Haven't read it yet. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 | Not JF's best work unfortunately.
I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
 elwoodbluesElwood BluesPremium
join:2006-08-30
HarperLand
 ·Cybersurf Intern..
| said by resa1983:Not JF's best work unfortunately.
I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
He tends to be too flippant in his submissions. |
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17 | reply to resa1983
I'm surprised JF is still doing this... |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to elwoodblues
heh his comment on "marketing" made me chuckle.  |
|
|
|
| reply to elwoodblues
said by elwoodblues:said by resa1983:Not JF's best work unfortunately.
I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
He tends to be too flippant in his submissions. It's perfectly adequate for the issue at-hand.
If Blais' "consumer focus" is to be believed, then JF's submission presents the matter in a very consumer-like manner that even Pentefountas should be able to understand. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | This is all a game anyhow since Rogers knows the upcoming wholesale costing revision is going to lead to price changes.
Also makes me wonder how many people would need to upgrade to a doc-3 modem? Out of that, how many are new to TPIA providers and just bought their doc-2 modem which is now no good? Will resellers swap them out with just a price difference for these new customers?
Is there anyone here that would have to swap modems? |
|
 mlernerPremium
join:2000-11-25
Nepean, ON
kudos:5 | reply to HiVolt
said by HiVolt:I'm surprised JF is still doing this...
He apparently got nothing else to do except attend ISP and regulatory events or ride his bike to Timbuktu. Either way, his submissions are entertaining and aren't hurting anyone. |
|
| +1
I think JF changed the timetable and marching plans of both sides with his actions and he definitely got exposure for the logic of things from the citizens perspective, something that probably would not have happened otherwise.
I wish he'd overcome his differences with DSLR, I think in some ways this is a better forum for him than Twitter. |
|
| said by Vomio:I think in some ways this is a better forum for him than Twitter.
Maybe he's on a diff forum? This isn't the only one... |
|
| Could be, there is the rest of the internet.
I think the only place my browsing has crossed paths with him posting recently is Twitter, but then again I don't have much reason to go on a JF hunt. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| Knock it off guys. Lets keep this about CNOC vs Rogers, and not about how you guys think about JF. Its disrespectful, especially as he's busted his ass for years in his filings trying to make things better for all of us.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| said by resa1983:Knock it off guys. Lets keep this about CNOC vs Rogers, and not about how you guys think about JF. Its disrespectful, especially as he's busted his ass for years in his filings trying to make things better for all of us.
+1 |
|
| reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:Knock it off guys. Lets keep this about CNOC vs Rogers, and not about how you guys think about JF. Its disrespectful, especially as he's busted his ass for years in his filings trying to make things better for all of us.
If I may interject here... Just wanted to add...
It's people & CNOC versus Rogers.
JF represents a lot of people (like the Quebec consumers union or PIAC or CIPPIC).
CNOC, as per their mandate, represents the resale business and their business interests. Thus the reason why JF is an important factor in all this. He brings all the question and rants we have on the table in plain language and doesn't represent business interests (like how CNOC member distributel was all for UBB, as an example). |
|
