http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27728438 en Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:27:44 EDT Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:27:44 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27735311 Incoming: lan1
Source:any
Destination: any
Service: any
Source port : any
Next Hop: auto
DSCP Marking:preserve
SNAT : outgoing-interface]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27735311 Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:17:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27733922
What Brano is recommending is what I am running. The 192.168.2.x network for me is like a Guest net in that none of my personal items are there.

P.S. your original problem is the firewall is going to block all the data between the two subnets unless you explicitly allow it. So whatever protocol you want to allow, you need to open the ports for. Or just open everything between those two as a test. you can also make the firewall log any packets blocked between those two subnets and that will let you know what is not being allowed.

Also, I don't think netbios will jump across subnets by default. So I don't know how the computers will discover each other in the first place.

--
dnoyeB

"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor
man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes
9:16
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27733922 Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:25:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27728867 But if your USG20W is acting as wireless AP only (no internet connection directly to it) I'd recommend to create the 192.168.2.x network on USG50 and get rid of the NAT (I'm assuming your have on USG20W today since I see your connection to WAN port).
The USG50 will automatically add the required static routes between 1.x and 2.x LANs and all you need to do is appropriate firewall rules. And take care of your WLAN (which seems to be working today based on your description).
Suggested setup on picture below (can be further improved/simplified if you describe what your desired setup is and if the two switches are VLAN capable).
Also 2.x network can be bridged with 10.59.x network to make things even simpler.
[att=1]

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27728867 Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:59:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27728438
P.S. I put inactive the LAN2 in USG 50 and I put inactive LAN1 on the USG 20W. Also, the DNS Server for each LAN1 or LAN2 is the Zywall.

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Connection-to-shares-on-different-subnets-27728438 Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:55:50 EDT