| reply to DataRiker
Re: Festering Toilet. Have you looked at U-verse TV lately? I think it's gotten better since I dumped it some 18 months ago (maybe 2 years). I saw it at someone's house the other day, it didn't look half bad even with fast action sports in HD. |
|
| I have it. It's still the same crappy HD. But it's cheap when you're in the promo period! |
|
|
|
etaadmin
join:2002-01-17
Dallas, TX
kudos:1 | reply to MyDogHsFleas
Yes, last week. TV picture quality is as bad as the day it was introduced to the public six years ago. Internet connection is still unstable (at that particular home) Internet speeds at least half (TWC 50Mbps) of what cable offers and worst case scenario a quarter and as much as 1/12 (300Mbps) of what Comcast offers. |
|
| reply to delltechkid
Hmm. I saw some posts over on the AT&T community forum claiming they were rolling out new encoders to the VRADs. And some were seeing significant improvement. |
|
| said by MyDogHsFleas:Hmm. I saw some posts over on the AT&T community forum claiming they were rolling out new encoders to the VRADs. And some were seeing significant improvement.
All of your statements are correct. They contradict the statements of the non-customers in this thread. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Mediacom
·RoadRunner Cable
| So I went ahead and got uverse TV installed. They have a 30 day money back guarantee so no risk. I have to say I like it. I kept my TWC DOCSIS 3 Internet because its clearly faster and cheaper than uverse Internet. Also this way my Internet bandwidth is not shared with TV.
HD quality is better than I remember it last time I tried it 18 months ago or so. I find it acceptable.
More channels, less money.
Only one DVR to record 4 shows.
Wireless boxes.
Light years better UI to the STB than cable. Also much faster responsiveness navigating through the UI and switching channels.
It has apps! Personalized weather, stocks, sports scores.
I am keeping it and dumping cable TV. |
|
