| reply to Guspaz
Re: New Band Rates? said by Guspaz:It looks like:
1) Bell proposed new unbundled loop fees (not dry loop fees, although those are defined as 50% of the unbundled loop fees)
2) The CRTC overrode Bell's proposed fees by using a different interpretation of cost
3) Bell was upset and submitted an R&V
4) This ruling from the CRTC says that the CRTC did not err, their corrected rates will stand.
Actually, the rates are now lower than before Bell filed their rate increase. Their cost studied were flawed.
--
MNSi Internet - »www.mnsi.net |
|
 hm
@videotron.ca | The bottom of Table 2 (new approved rates) looks more expensive at the higher ends by a dollar or two. Maybe 25-cents lower on bands A to C.
Or is that not the correct data? Or am I reading it wrong.
I'm comparing Bell Canada (Not Bell Aliant), Table 2. First row Versus last row. |
|
| You have to compare the old Phase II cost to the new Phase II cost (line 1 and line 7). Line 8 is after the allowed markup is added.
--
MNSi Internet - »www.mnsi.net |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | You are right. Saw my mistake when i looked it over. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to HeadSpinning
Does this mean the iisps will get a retroactive refund over the past 3 years?
I don't expect the users to get refunds (~1/month), but for an iisp lets say with 10K users over paying loop fee's @ 10K/month over 3 years... that a nice injection.... $360K
Seems to me the CRTC states this is retroactive. |
|
