<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;EXT4 File-System Tuning Benchmarks&#x27; in forum &#x27;All Things Unix&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/EXT4-FileSystem-Tuning-Benchmarks-27735173</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:03:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:03:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>EXT4 File-System Tuning Benchmarks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/EXT4-FileSystem-Tuning-Benchmarks-27735173</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : From <A HREF="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_linux35_tuning&num=1">Phoronix</a>:<br><div class="bquote"><p>Following last month's <A HREF="http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18022">Btrfs file-system tuning</a> benchmarks, in this article are a similar set of tests when stressing the EXT4 file-system with its various performance-related mount options. Here are a number of EXT4 benchmarks from Ubuntu 12.10 with different mount option configurations.</p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/EXT4-FileSystem-Tuning-Benchmarks-27735173</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:29:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
