dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
55
share rss forum feed

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10
reply to bt

Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers

My response.

Thank you Ares & cloneman for proofing.


hm

@videotron.ca
said by resa1983:

My response.

Nicely done.

I'm not sure if it contradicts CNOC in some areas though. Think it does, But don't feel like rereading everything to double check.

But very nicely done. It rubbed Rogers nose in a few things they just stated that appears to not be true.

So w/ Rogers new filing today, I guess this sort of proves this post:
»Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers

Some of this seems to be a fault with the TPIA providers as well since they knew very well everything was being pushed to aggregated (which makes sense) This was even stated.. what.. a year or two ago?

heh resa1983 took Rogers by the scruff of the neck and pushed their nose in their own doodoo. I like it.

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10
said by hm :

said by resa1983:

My response.

Nicely done.

I'm not sure if it contradicts CNOC in some areas though. Think it does, But don't feel like rereading everything to double check.

Ack.. Thats not good. I was trying not to. :\

EDIT: Ahh.. I see. Those prices were aggregated, there were different ones for disaggregated. Thats about the only thing. I just added supporting documentation to the CNOC request.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP


elwoodblues
Elwood Blues
Premium
join:2006-08-30
Somewhere in
kudos:2
reply to resa1983
Nicely done Ressy.

Showing screen shots from the Rogers page is going to kick them in the head hard.

resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:10
said by elwoodblues:

Nicely done Ressy.

Showing screen shots from the Rogers page is going to kick them in the head hard.

I hope the Commission sees through the blatant lies Rogers made (as usual), and even decides that despite disagg shouldn't receive upgrades (2011-703 apparently), the fact that Rogers put off doing this TN for so bloody long so they could keep higher speeds to themselves, and pull customers back from TPIA, they'll decide they need to even the playing field some.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP


hm

@videotron.ca
reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:

EDIT: Ahh.. I see. Those prices were aggregated, there were different ones for disaggregated.

Yup that's what I noticed, but was too lazy to double check that.


shrug

@videotron.ca
reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:

said by elwoodblues:

Nicely done Ressy.

Showing screen shots from the Rogers page is going to kick them in the head hard.

I hope the Commission sees through the blatant lies Rogers made

CRTC, in the past, just ignored peoples comments. So don't be surprised if they believe rogers and just ignore what you gave them.

One time JF filed for Access To Information on what the CRTC chairs got in terms of info. Basically someone breaks it all down for them in a flow chart as follows:

Bell, Rogers, Cogeco, Videotron, Shaw, and Sasktel give us stuff we can't afford
|
|
v
Approved

That's all they see. Well, Maybe not exactly like that, but it was close to it . You may want to ask JF about that and the info they actually got. JF got a single flow chart with all the info (which ignored 99% of the actual info). They just ignore everyone.

BUT... The Canadian Government marketing machine says it's a brand new CRTC with a consumer focus.