dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
32

hm
@videotron.ca

hm to resa1983

Anon

to resa1983

Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers

said by resa1983:

My response.

Nicely done.

I'm not sure if it contradicts CNOC in some areas though. Think it does, But don't feel like rereading everything to double check.

But very nicely done. It rubbed Rogers nose in a few things they just stated that appears to not be true.

So w/ Rogers new filing today, I guess this sort of proves this post:
»Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers

Some of this seems to be a fault with the TPIA providers as well since they knew very well everything was being pushed to aggregated (which makes sense) This was even stated.. what.. a year or two ago?

heh resa1983 took Rogers by the scruff of the neck and pushed their nose in their own doodoo. I like it.
resa1983
Premium Member
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON

resa1983

Premium Member

said by hm :

said by resa1983:

My response.

Nicely done.

I'm not sure if it contradicts CNOC in some areas though. Think it does, But don't feel like rereading everything to double check.

Ack.. Thats not good. I was trying not to. :\

EDIT: Ahh.. I see. Those prices were aggregated, there were different ones for disaggregated. Thats about the only thing. I just added supporting documentation to the CNOC request.

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

said by resa1983:

EDIT: Ahh.. I see. Those prices were aggregated, there were different ones for disaggregated.

Yup that's what I noticed, but was too lazy to double check that.