dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
27
DrStrangLov
join:2012-03-28

DrStrangLov to n1581j

Member

to n1581j

Re: Here we go again.....

said by n1581j :

I am more than happy to have 56k for reading the morning papers,

Then use Lynx - "Lynx is a text browser for the World Wide Web."
»lynx.browser.org

Turn off Wildblue's proxy when using Lynx....
silbaco
Premium Member
join:2009-08-03
USA

silbaco

Premium Member

said by DrStrangLov:

said by n1581j :

I am more than happy to have 56k for reading the morning papers,

Then use Lynx - "Lynx is a text browser for the World Wide Web."
»lynx.browser.org

Turn off Wildblue's proxy when using Lynx....

Hahaha. That's funny. Text web browsers are completely worthless unless you using ssh to connect to a server and have no other option during an emergency.
DrStrangLov
join:2012-03-28

DrStrangLov

Member

said by silbaco:

Hahaha. That's funny. Text web browsers are completely worthless

For Linux users:

w3m is a free software/open source text-based web browser. It has support for tables, frames,[2] SSL connections, color and inline images on suitable terminals. Generally, it renders pages in a form as true to their original layout as possible.

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3m
silbaco
Premium Member
join:2009-08-03
USA

silbaco

Premium Member

said by DrStrangLov:

said by silbaco:

Hahaha. That's funny. Text web browsers are completely worthless

For Linux users:

w3m is a free software/open source text-based web browser. It has support for tables, frames,[2] SSL connections, color and inline images on suitable terminals. Generally, it renders pages in a form as true to their original layout as possible.

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3m

Yes, and if you want to actually use the internet you will use a regular web browser. Text-based browsers are okay when you only have a terminal or have too much time on your hands. Any other time and they are impractical.
said by n1581j :

I never did get through on the phone, did manage to chat online, was offered an upgrade to Select for $79 + 9.95 or to go to Exede for the same price, free installation and no modem lease fee for 2 years after which it's $9.95 a month. I don't know if it's worth signing a new 2 year contract @ $24 more a month ($578) for what I do at home with LTE supposedly coming in 2013. Verizons map shows the extended area is close already, I could spit on a windy day and reach it. I have it at the Office which is 12 miles away.

Between a rock and a hard place with the wife bitching, maybe it's time to go on my travels again.

I've heard great things about HomeFusion (other than the price) if that is what you are thinking about. I would consider waiting for that over Exede. Not that Exede is bad, but HomeFusion is simply better unless you need to download lots of data during the night like Exede offers. Otherwise the under 100ms latency from HomeFusion is great.
DrStrangLov
join:2012-03-28

DrStrangLov

Member

said by silbaco:

I've heard great things about HomeFusion (other than the price)

Great speeds, they say....needless to say, Verizon's proxy brings about delusional speed results.

»/r0/do ··· test.jpg

»Re: [General] Home Fusion install scheduled
silbaco
Premium Member
join:2009-08-03
USA

silbaco

Premium Member

That would be true if it that were a Verizon HomeFusion speedtest, which it isn't. And assuming a proxy stands between HomeFusion and the internet and it is very possible there isn't one.
DrStrangLov
join:2012-03-28

DrStrangLov

Member

See this thread: »[General] Home Fusion install scheduled

Its highly unlikely this speed test is for real on HomeFusion: »Re: [General] Home Fusion install scheduled
silbaco
Premium Member
join:2009-08-03
USA

silbaco

Premium Member

said by DrStrangLov:

See this thread: »[General] Home Fusion install scheduled

Its highly unlikely this speed test is for real on HomeFusion: »Re: [General] Home Fusion install scheduled

I have read that thread. In its entirety. And the one who posted that does not have HomeFusion. It was solely to show off OOKLA as being inaccurate, which at times it is. But so is every speedtest.
DrStrangLov
join:2012-03-28

DrStrangLov

Member

n1581j can choose whatever, but articles I've seen only suggest

five to 12 Mbps down
two to five Mbps up speeds

so, when you see a post boasting this: »Re: HomeFusion

»/r0/do ··· 4142.png

its clear that's BS.

Even WiMax can do 13Mbps downstream, on a good day, but typical speeds will be around 4 Mbps, and slower.

It's all hype, with time, this too will slow down in areas with traffic (ie., congestion), just like 3 G, you might get 3.3Mbps without traffic. Same old hype...its fast, until the pilgrims come onboard.

Real tests are watching HD video, and downloads...

»gizmodo.com/5174718/excl ··· ed-tests

»www.engadget.com/2012/05 ··· ionwide/

»www.gottabemobile.com/20 ··· ionwide/
silbaco
Premium Member
join:2009-08-03
USA

silbaco

Premium Member

No reason to believe that is BS. Verizon does not cap LTE speeds for the time being. I have seen numerous reports of Verizon speeds hitting over 50mbps and At&t hitting over 70mbps. With a bucket sized cantenna, I am sure it can pull in the speeds. Granted it will slow down over time, but I have no doubt Verizon will fulfill their 5-12mbps promise and exceed it most of the time. There won't ever be many people on these more rural towers.

Exede will also slow down in the future. They may have made a promise not to significantly over sell to the point of serious degradation, but they will over sell and they already have. It only takes 10,000 people downloading at 12mbps to move over 120gbps of data through viasat-1, filling it. Viasat has made a bet that 10,000 people won't pull all 12mbps at any given time and it is a solid bet, except during peak time. Eventually the numbers will add up and peak time will slow. Not by much, but some. Will they truly stop selling then or not? Only time will tell.
DrStrangLov
join:2012-03-28

DrStrangLov

Member

said by silbaco:

Exede...but they will over sell and they already have.

Not having enough of a Big Pipe is not the same as overselling; Big Pipes cost serious bucks, and most all ISPs increase pipe size when they perceive it is needed.

Go out and price a one gigabyte pipe, or even 100 mbps pipe; kept in mind that Exede might have to buy it from two different parties at each server location.

Yes, on Exede 5, when downloading a Youtube file, it may start out around 1 MB/sec, but if other users exist, traffic control will shift speed to around 100 KB/sec (0.8192 Mb/sec). For a file download, I don't complain, on Exede5. YMMV on Exede5/12