| reply to Jackarino
Re: Actiontec MI424WR FIOS N Router REV. I I just received the rev I as a replacement to my rev C and I was wondering what everyone's experiences have been like with the rev I so far? I currently have my own router (asus rt-n66u) in front of my old rev C due to the poor performance and small NAT table of the rev C. Wondering if it would be worth it to put the actiontec back as the primary router and avoid the remote dvr / caller id issues?
So my question is how is UPNP and the NAT table on the rev I? I do a lot of online gaming often have multiple xboxes hooked up. |
|
 JackarinoPremium
join:2006-12-28
Allendale, NJ
kudos:1 | The Rev I is a significant improvement over the Rev C for sure. But your Asus is dual band while the Actiontec is not
--
Romney - Ryan 2012
Christie 2016 |
|
| said by Jackarino:The Rev I is a significant improvement over the Rev C for sure. But your Asus is dual band while the Actiontec is not
Yea I would probably disable the wireless on the actiontec and then make the asus function as an access point only. |
|
