<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Canadian Broadband&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27749123</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:41:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:41:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28255579</link>
<description><![CDATA[pc8888 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>It looks like VMWare isn't an option on the $39 box, but they do have for those Xen, Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtuozzo, or Hyper-V.<br><br>Only the SP range and higher get VMWare, and those start at $59. That one can have SmartOS, VMWare ESXi, Xen, Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtuozzo, or Hyper-V.<br> </p></div>$59 bucks, ESXi 5 + 16gb ram + hosting in Canada is still cheaper than everybody else. I like Amazon, but all the clients I have met do not like residing data on US soil. At least not on the paper.<br><br>P.S. Amazon EC2 can't do Oracle RAC but it seems like this OVH can handle it. Gotta do more research...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28255579</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 10:39:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28254416</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cyborg994 posted : I have been looking into smartos lately, looks very promising, and it's actually an option at OVH. Pretty cool!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28254416</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:39:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28247252</link>
<description><![CDATA[mlerner posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>It looks like VMWare isn't an option on the $39 box, but they do have for those Xen, Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtuozzo, or Hyper-V.<br><br>Only the SP range and higher get VMWare, and those start at $59. That one can have SmartOS, VMWare ESXi, Xen, Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtuozzo, or Hyper-V.<br> </p></div>Actually you can use vSphere on the KS servers but you have to order it with a distro on the list and then do a reinstall. The only caveat is that it's not supported by OVH officially and vSphere doesn't support the software RAID so the disks will be show up independently.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28247252</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:25:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28247060</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : It looks like VMWare isn't an option on the $39 box, but they do have for those Xen, Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtuozzo, or Hyper-V.<br><br>Only the SP range and higher get VMWare, and those start at $59. That one can have SmartOS, VMWare ESXi, Xen, Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtuozzo, or Hyper-V.<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28247060</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:33:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28246936</link>
<description><![CDATA[pc8888 posted : I am new to this. <br><br>I am interested in the $39 box. I read that some of you are using vwmare and I am thinking about running ESXi 5.1 on it. <br><br>Does it come with ESXi when I place the order?<br>If not, is there any link out there that show me how to do it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28246936</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:57:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28008039</link>
<description><![CDATA[julienvf posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1133865" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1133865');">analog andy</a>:</said><p>Well there's always some dick head that doesn't want to play fair in the sand pit.</p></div>It really is. Every other major incumbent ISP in Ontario/Quebec and many more eastern ones peer at TorIX. Rogers, Videotron, Cogeco, Bell Aliant, Eastlink, Shaw... Even some American incumbents peer, like Frontier and AT&T... Admittedly, some like AT&T and Videotron are no longer actively peering despite their connection (Videotron to TekSavvy goes through Limelight), although for this specific case Videotron peers directly with OVH.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1133865" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1133865');">analog andy</a>:</said><p>At $39 its quite tempting to get one. I might just have to cancel my adsl connection (keeping one for backup purposes) and get that server.</p></div>You missed the better deal, where they had Atom servers (which still had huge bandwidth and hard drives) in Montreal selling for 119 euros per year. That's what DSL_Ricer's dad got.<br> </p></div>That's the one I got too... Was too tempting!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28008039</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:52:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007474</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1133865" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1133865');">analog andy</a>:</said><p>Well there's always some dick head that doesn't want to play fair in the sand pit.</p></div>It really is. Every other major incumbent ISP in Ontario/Quebec and many more eastern ones peer at TorIX. Rogers, Videotron, Cogeco, Bell Aliant, Eastlink, Shaw... Even some American incumbents peer, like Frontier and AT&T... Admittedly, some like AT&T and Videotron are no longer actively peering despite their connection (Videotron to TekSavvy goes through Limelight), although for this specific case Videotron peers directly with OVH.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1133865" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1133865');">analog andy</a>:</said><p>At $39 its quite tempting to get one. I might just have to cancel my adsl connection (keeping one for backup purposes) and get that server.</p></div>You missed the better deal, where they had Atom servers (which still had huge bandwidth and hard drives) in Montreal selling for 119 euros per year. That's what DSL_Ricer's dad got.<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007474</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:20:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007412</link>
<description><![CDATA[analog andy posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Fair enough (I was going by their headquarters connection), but the majority of your problems seem to be your own connection, since you have what appears to be basically 43ms + of first-hop latency. And the extra latency to OVH seems to be entirely a factor of Bell Canada refusing to peer at TorIX, forcing the connection to take a detour. Bell's arrogance and intransigence is turning the ~550km trip from Montreal to Toronto into a 2200km trip. Bell's self-absorbed peering policies are adding 1700 kilometers to the journey.<br> </p></div>Well there's always some dick head that doesn't want to play fair in the sand pit.<br><br>At $39 its quite tempting to get one. I might just have to cancel my adsl connection (keeping one for backup purposes) and get that server.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007412</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:02:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007305</link>
<description><![CDATA[mlerner posted : Might I add Rogers has fantastic peering through TorIX.  :) Always low latency to my OVH servers.<br><br>Tracing route to 8.7.244.2 over a maximum of 30 hops<br><br>  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.0.1<br>  2     8 ms     8 ms     6 ms  7.41.204.1<br>  3    27 ms    23 ms    14 ms  24.156.149.97<br>  4    17 ms    14 ms    14 ms  69.63.250.218<br>  5    14 ms    13 ms    12 ms  69.63.248.190<br>  6    30 ms     *       14 ms  gw-ovh.torontointernetxchange.net [206.108.34.18<br>9]<br>  7    21 ms     *       23 ms  mtl-2-6k.qc.ca [178.32.135.71]<br>  8     *       22 ms     *     bhs-g1-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.5]<br>  9    21 ms     *        *     bhs-1-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.12]<br> 10    22 ms    22 ms    22 ms  8.7.244.2<br><br>Trace complete.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007305</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:33:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007260</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : Fair enough (I was going by their headquarters connection), but the majority of your problems seem to be your own connection, since you have what appears to be basically 43ms + of first-hop latency. And the extra latency to OVH seems to be entirely a factor of Bell Canada refusing to peer at TorIX, forcing the connection to take a detour. Bell's arrogance and intransigence is turning the ~550km trip from Montreal to Toronto into a 2200km trip. Bell's self-absorbed peering policies are adding 1700 kilometers to the journey.<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007260</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:23:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007176</link>
<description><![CDATA[analog andy posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Netelligent is still 1000 km closer to you than Montreal...<br><br>Seriously, look at a map. Latency scales with geographic distance.<br> </p></div>My old Netelligent dedi server and shared account are both in Montreal.<br><br>OVH<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>  1     4 ms     3 ms     5 ms  192.168.0.1<br>  2    70 ms    99 ms    99 ms  192.168.1.254<br>  3    90 ms    44 ms    45 ms  zz20920586075.cipherkey.net [209.205.86.75]<br>  4    43 ms    44 ms    45 ms  xx208110096019.cipherkey.com [208.110.96.19]<br>  5    44 ms    43 ms    44 ms  xx208110096090.cipherkey.com [208.110.96.90]<br>  6    43 ms    44 ms    43 ms  67.69.228.189<br>  7    44 ms    47 ms    43 ms  core2-vancouver_POS3-0.net.bell.ca [64.230.248.6<br>1]<br>  8   111 ms   112 ms   110 ms  core4-vancouver_pos0-0-1.net.bell.ca [64.230.183<br>.38]<br>  9   114 ms   115 ms   113 ms  tcore4-toronto12_POS0-8-0-0.net.bell.ca [64.230.<br>147.209]<br> 10   112 ms   112 ms   113 ms  newcore2-chicago23_so2-0-0.net.bell.ca [64.230.1<br>47.174]<br> 11   110 ms   110 ms   111 ms  bx5-chicagodt_xe0-1-0_0 [64.230.186.255]<br> 12   110 ms     *        *     eqx.chi.ovh.net [206.223.119.152]<br> 13   131 ms   129 ms   128 ms  198.27.73.173<br> 14     *      127 ms   127 ms  bhs-g1-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.5]<br> 15   207 ms   251 ms   212 ms  bhs-1-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.12]<br> 16   129 ms   129 ms   129 ms  8.7.244.2<br> </p></div>Netelligent<br><br> <div class="bquote"><p>  1     3 ms     4 ms     4 ms  192.168.0.1<br>  2    81 ms    99 ms    99 ms  192.168.1.254<br>  3    47 ms    48 ms    58 ms  zz20920586075.cipherkey.net [209.205.86.75]<br>  4    43 ms    46 ms    44 ms  xx208110096019.cipherkey.com [208.110.96.19]<br>  5    44 ms    44 ms    44 ms  xx208110096026.cipherkey.com [208.110.96.26]<br>  6    44 ms    44 ms    45 ms  67.69.228.189<br>  7   106 ms   107 ms   108 ms  core2-vancouver_POS3-0.net.bell.ca [64.230.248.6<br>1]<br>  8   106 ms   105 ms   104 ms  core4-vancouver_pos0-0-1.net.bell.ca [64.230.183<br>.38]<br>  9   110 ms   110 ms   107 ms  tcore4-toronto47_POS0-12-1-0.net.bell.ca [64.230<br>.147.193]<br> 10   106 ms   107 ms   107 ms  64.230.147.129<br> 11   114 ms   109 ms   113 ms  tcore3-montreal02_POS0-7-0-0_core.net.bell.ca [6<br>4.230.168.97]<br> 12   108 ms   105 ms   105 ms  agg1-montreal02_xe5-0-0.net.bell.ca [64.230.170.<br>242]<br> 13   104 ms   106 ms   105 ms  dis53-montreal02_5-0-0.net.bell.ca [64.230.169.1<br>70]<br> 14   106 ms   105 ms   107 ms  67.69.244.158<br> 15   111 ms   110 ms   111 ms  209.44.125.160<br> 16   105 ms   106 ms   105 ms  todd.dnsprive.com [209.44.106.221]<br> </p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28007176</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:05:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28006727</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : Netelligent is still 1000 km closer to you than Montreal...<br><br>Seriously, look at a map. Latency scales with geographic distance.<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28006727</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:15:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28006571</link>
<description><![CDATA[analog andy posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Routing? No, more like Denver is a fraction the distance from BC as compared to Montreal... Surrey to Denver is ~2,300 km, while Surrey to Montreal is ~4,500 km.<br><br>In terms of latency, I pinged DSL_Ricer's father's OVH box from my Montreal TekSavvy connection and got a stable 21ms. It went through TorIX. The lower latency is probably due to being on VDSL2 (which has lower first-hop latency).<br> </p></div>Odd as my ping to a server at Netelligent has always been in the 70's and to OVH its in the 90/100's even NFOservers NY is in the 90's/100's.<br><br>I just need a cheap game server, $39 is a crazy price. I guess I could get two different ones East (OVH) and West (VPS NFO Seattle) then use the OVH one to host the map files.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28006571</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:39:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28006347</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : Routing? No, more like Denver is a fraction the distance from BC as compared to Montreal... Surrey to Denver is ~2,300 km, while Surrey to Montreal is ~4,500 km.<br><br>In terms of latency, I pinged DSL_Ricer's father's OVH box from my Montreal TekSavvy connection and got a stable 21ms. It went through TorIX. The lower latency is probably due to being on VDSL2 (which has lower first-hop latency).<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28006347</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:42:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28005877</link>
<description><![CDATA[julienvf posted : I get about 24-25ms ping from Montréal but traffic is routed through torix (Toronto back and forth).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28005877</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:33:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28005761</link>
<description><![CDATA[analog andy posted : I was going to get one of their $39 servers for hosting a game but the ping was quite a bit slower (93-120ms) from Surrey to OVH (proof.ovh.ca) vs Surrey to Denver (VPS NFOserversms) (64-98ms)<br><br>I guess the routing is more efficient to the Denver location vs going through Canada?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-28005761</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 03:58:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27950207</link>
<description><![CDATA[green92 posted : OVH service is pretty good. They may have the biggest data center on Earth now in Montreal. If only they could provide VoIP and internet in Canada as they do in France that would be a awesome!<br> I pay only 1.18 euro/month for unlimited calls to 100+ countries.<br>And could shake our beloved canadian ISPs that rip us all !]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27950207</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:13:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27930681</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ree posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1775260" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1775260');">funny</a>:</said><p>if you buy a service and are supposed to pay a taxes on it and AVOID OR EVADE them by skirting rules or finding a technicality of location know this...there actually is a law on the books to catch pedobears that is in effect</p></div>And why do you assume he ordered from the EU site to avoid taxes?  If you'd looked into things before making your accusation, you would know it's much more likely that he ordered from the EU site because it is the only one that sells that particular server.<br><br>The CA site sells the mid to high-end Kimsufi servers, the EU site currently has a special offering one of the low-end Kimsufi servers.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by hm :</said><p>Read further up that some people have a very poor response times to their servers. Was this limited to TSI users? Is it fixed now? Shaw, Telus and Cogeco land have no issues?<br></p></div>I've only seen a TekSavvy user report it, but it's entirely possible that other ISPs are affected and their users just aren't noticing/reporting it.<br><br>All is well with Rogers though -- backing up my ESXi VMs via rsync maxes the 100mbit connection.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27930681</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:50:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27929802</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1455786" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1455786');">Ree</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by hm :</said><p>So what's the consensus of everyone here with OVH?<br><br>Yay or Nay?<br><br>Worth it? Better value can be found at "X" (insert name here)?<br><br>Anyone actually using them? Beefs?<br> </p></div>I don't think you'll find a better bang for your buck.  I've been using them for several months and no beefs yet.<br><br>I think the real test will be the first time something dies like a hard-drive and I have to wait for support to fix it.  I've heard stories going both ways -- some say replacement was quick and easy, others have said it was a nightmare procedure.<br><br>I take lots of backups and don't host anything mission-critical, so even nightmare support wouldn't be such a big deal in my case so that's why I'm with them.  Yay or Nay is entirely dependent on your particular situation though.<br> </p></div>TY for the response, Ree.<br><br>About routing...<br><br>Read further up that some people have a very poor response times to their servers. Was this limited to TSI users? Is it fixed now? Shaw, Telus and Cogeco land have no issues?<br><br>Anyone know?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27929802</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:40:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928830</link>
<description><![CDATA[funny posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1455786" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1455786');">Ree</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1775260" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1775260');">funny</a>:</said><p>funny your admiting to tax avoidance/evasion.<br>boy ive read this thread and you all better hope someone isnt asking dslreports for ips like voltage did.<br> </p></div>I'd love to hear your explanation of how that is tax avoidance and/or evasion.<br> </p></div>if you buy a service and are supposed to pay a taxes on it and AVOID OR EVADE them by skirting rules or finding a technicality of location know this...there actually is a law on the books to catch pedobears that is in effect ...what a canuck does on the net OUR LAWS APPLY....thus if your buying internet server from ovh and its located in canada but using a site in EU and evading taxes if they really wanted to come sideways at you they could for it....it also ina  future of any issue you have be just something else they add on you to make you look even worse in front of any judge.<br><br>OH and trust me they will be far quicker at closing loopholes for small fry then big corporate types that use the nation of belize to launder money....( where was it helena and jaffer vacationed again?)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928830</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:21:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928816</link>
<description><![CDATA[funny posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>What a funny guy? Rogers and Videotron combined are roughly 2 million broadband subs between them, and Canada has roughly 10 million in total. Those two ISPs alone are 20% of all broadband subs, not a bad start for direct peering... If they can get peering with Bell, that would take them up to 50% right there.<br> </p></div>by subs you mean users subscribers WRONG in 2006 sandvine came up with 24 million accounts and 5.4 million p2p users at one time and 4 months later it jumped to 9.8 million see a trend....<br>anyhow cant tell on validity BUT last september CBC ran some internet article saying we had 21 million net users. lost 3 million since caps were introduced....<br>thats a lot of revenue they lost for being silly<br>take bell<br>both me and my dad have dropped them ( ONLY what tsi gives them is what they get now )<br>so you get a tv /phone loss on my dads side and phone and net loss to whatever tsi gives them.<br><br>no wonder they THINK THEY NEED caps now....they screwed themsleves for customers and its a need fer greed issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928816</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:17:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928806</link>
<description><![CDATA[funny posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1607777" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1607777');">julienvf</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1585783" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1585783');">Guru</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1607777" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1607777');">julienvf</a>:</said><p>I didn't get charged any taxes on the 119 euros yearly plan...<br> </p></div>I bought a $39 server from OVH.ca today and got charged tax. <br> </p></div>Yea, you bought it on the .ca domain while I got mine on the EU site.<br> </p></div>so your admitting to tax evasion? oh my...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928806</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:12:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928739</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ree posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by hm :</said><p>So what's the consensus of everyone here with OVH?<br><br>Yay or Nay?<br><br>Worth it? Better value can be found at "X" (insert name here)?<br><br>Anyone actually using them? Beefs?<br> </p></div>I don't think you'll find a better bang for your buck.  I've been using them for several months and no beefs yet.<br><br>I think the real test will be the first time something dies like a hard-drive and I have to wait for support to fix it.  I've heard stories going both ways -- some say replacement was quick and easy, others have said it was a nightmare procedure.<br><br>I take lots of backups and don't host anything mission-critical, so even nightmare support wouldn't be such a big deal in my case so that's why I'm with them.  Yay or Nay is entirely dependent on your particular situation though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928739</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:48:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928175</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : So what's the consensus of everyone here with OVH?<br><br>Yay or Nay?<br><br>Worth it? Better value can be found at "X" (insert name here)?<br><br>Anyone actually using them? Beefs?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27928175</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:12:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27904702</link>
<description><![CDATA[Satya posted : in p2p world..the reasons are unlimited..if that is not your need..then you pick the datacenter that will give you the best routing to your location]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27904702</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 04:16:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899991</link>
<description><![CDATA[MaynardKrebs posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Why would we ever pick the RBX datacenter instead of the Canadian datacenter?<br><br> </p></div>Dunno. But they might pick the Irish datacentre to establish a 'legal' presence in Ireland for their Netherlands Antillies operations.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899991</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:50:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899981</link>
<description><![CDATA[MaynardKrebs posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1826681" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1826681');">rednekcowboy</a>:</said><p>Aren't Rogers and Videotron owned by the same conglamorate/are sister companies?  I could have sworn I read that somewhere but can't find it now...<br><br> </p></div>No, they aren't.<br><br>But they were roommates at the "School of Customer Gouging".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899981</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:48:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899832</link>
<description><![CDATA[jmck posted : I'm sorry but i have several customers that use my services hosted on OVH including all over the US (using comcast, verizon FIOS, cox.net) and a few here (rogers, videotron, start.ca) and they all are able to mostly saturate their lines.<br><br>TSI seems to be the one exception even with a private peer setup last week.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899832</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:02:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899807</link>
<description><![CDATA[julienvf posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>Why would we ever pick the RBX datacenter instead of the Canadian datacenter?<br> </p></div>I was gonna ask the same thing. If you want to see how dl speed would be from their european datacenter, simply try a speedtest from www.ovh.net which is in France.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899807</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:55:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899632</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : Why would we ever pick the RBX datacenter instead of the Canadian datacenter?<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899632</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:09:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899564</link>
<description><![CDATA[Satya posted : I have been renting servers with OVH since 2006. Before they allowed only French citizens and countries with official languages as French to buy on their site www.ovh.com Montreal was part of that and the only province in Canada to be able to order directly. Otherwise you needed a french address and a french credit card number.<br><br>OVH was cheap at that point too offering 100mbit unmetered servers for 40-50 euros a month. They became really popular and were able to grow massively partly because of their pricing which lured all p2p users to rent their servers as "seedboxes". Resellers who were able to order form france were selling servers at a good 20 euros premium making them very profitable. <br><br>Seeing their business boom rapidly, they were able to internalize all their operations from building their own datacenters, to eco friendly electricity generation, build their own servers from scratch, own land and property rather than lease. All these business deals made them pass their savings to customers on their lower range of the servers.<br><br>However, OVH is not premium routing. If you download using a single thread and you are in Canada, you will get around 200-300KB/sec tops. Compare that to someone like softlayer.nl or nforce.nl or other premium providers you will see the difference. But NOONE can touch ovh on the budget range and that has what made them popular.<br><br>You can still order servers from www.ovh.ie and rent their servers and have a choice of the datacenter you want to pick. Most pick RBX which is roubaix in france and strasbourg is their relatively newer one in europe.<br><br>You can check the network map that OVH has from here -><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://weathermap.ovh.net" >weathermap.ovh.net</A><br><br>You can register on their forums here -> &raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.ovh.co.uk" >forums.ovh.co.uk</A><br><br>You can check the status of their network issues, their work in progress on various datacenters, router issues, outages here<br><br>--> &raquo;<A HREF="http://status.ovh.net" >status.ovh.net</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899564</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:48:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899362</link>
<description><![CDATA[rednekcowboy posted : Aren't Rogers and Videotron owned by the same conglamorate/are sister companies?  I could have sworn I read that somewhere but can't find it now...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899362</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:57:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899328</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ree posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1775260" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1775260');">funny</a>:</said><p>funny your admiting to tax avoidance/evasion.<br>boy ive read this thread and you all better hope someone isnt asking dslreports for ips like voltage did.<br> </p></div>I'd love to hear your explanation of how that is tax avoidance and/or evasion.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899328</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:48:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899097</link>
<description><![CDATA[funny posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1607777" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1607777');">julienvf</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1585783" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1585783');">Guru</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1607777" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1607777');">julienvf</a>:</said><p>I didn't get charged any taxes on the 119 euros yearly plan...<br> </p></div>I bought a $39 server from OVH.ca today and got charged tax. <br> </p></div>Yea, you bought it on the .ca domain while I got mine on the EU site.<br> </p></div>funny your admiting to tax avoidance/evasion.<br>boy ive read this thread and you all better hope someone isnt asking dslreports for ips like voltage did.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27899097</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:51:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27893420</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1762406" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1762406');">jmck</a>:</said><p>The only other large consumer provider<br><br>Anyways, I don't even see the point to this<br><br>I'm sure they'll increasing their private and public peering over time in Canada, but they can't just go and peer with Tier 1s that would rather sell them bandwidth.<br></p></div>There is more to the Internet than just DSL / cable connections.<br><br>You've made that pretty clear.<br><br>Who said anything about peering? They could have made better choices for their Canadian transit options or purchased additional transit from other providers to fill in the gaps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27893420</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:12:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27893403</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>What a funny guy? Rogers and Videotron combined are roughly 2 million broadband subs between them, and Canada has roughly 10 million in total. Those two ISPs alone are 20% of all broadband subs, not a bad start for direct peering... If they can get peering with Bell, that would take them up to 50% right there.<br> </p></div>I don't consider that a "pretty good chunk" and that still leaves out Bell, Telus, Allstream, Shaw and a few others. It's peering with Rogers, transit from Videotron.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27893403</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:07:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27892452</link>
<description><![CDATA[jmck posted : The only other large consumer provider I left out was Bell that had an east coast footprint which is where OVH is located (i suppose Cogeco is decent too).<br><br>Anyways, I don't even see the point to this, they also have transit in NYC/NJ and Chicago which is again where all of eastern Canada goes into.<br><br>I'm sure they'll increasing their private and public peering over time in Canada, but they can't just go and peer with Tier 1s that would rather sell them bandwidth.<br><br>As mentioned above too with TSI, private peering doesn't mean fast performance (altho this seems to be because of TSI not really caring).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27892452</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:24:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27889617</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : What a funny guy? Rogers and Videotron combined are roughly 2 million broadband subs between them, and Canada has roughly 10 million in total. Those two ISPs alone are 20% of all broadband subs, not a bad start for direct peering... If they can get peering with Bell, that would take them up to 50% right there.<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27889617</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:46:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886772</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/854713" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=854713');">ohmer</a>:</said><p>They should peer with peer1 at Montreal instead of NY like they do right now...<br> </p></div>Not instead of.. they should make an attempt to peer with them in as many places as possible.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886772</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:20:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886758</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/510249" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=510249');">Guspaz</a>:</said><p>That's a pretty good chunk of them, though.<br> </p></div>What a funny guy. Please stop making me laugh.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886758</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:17:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886658</link>
<description><![CDATA[ohmer posted : They should peer with peer1 at Montreal instead of NY like they do right now...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886658</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:44:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886613</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : That's a pretty good chunk of them, though. It's a new network, and a brand new datacenter. The routing may improve over time as they expand.<br><small>--<br>Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886613</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:33:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886441</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1762406" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1762406');">jmck</a>:</said><p>their canadian routing is very good for Rogers and Videotron and Start (I have customers on all of those getting amazing performance).<br> </p></div>There is more to Canadian networks than just those 2 carriers and a small ISP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27886441</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 19:24:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27885727</link>
<description><![CDATA[jmck posted : well the private peer didn't seem to help one bit, still struggling to get any decent throughput from OVH to TSI even at 1:45pm on a Sunday.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27885727</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:51:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27885011</link>
<description><![CDATA[jmck posted : their canadian routing is very good for Rogers and Videotron and Start (I have customers on all of those getting amazing performance).<br><br>their Montreal NOC/Network engineers seem to care too about performance and just turned up a private peer between TSI/OHV at TorIX which should improve performance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27885011</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:42:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27884595</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : Their Canadian routing is not very good at all, but what can you expect when their rates are so cheap. They could really gain from picking up some transit from Allstream to fill in the gap.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27884595</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:01:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27884525</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1023414" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1023414');">BoogaBooga</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1484420" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1484420');">brad</a>:</said><p>Would you be able to provide dmesg output and "lspci -vv" output for the i3 system?<br> </p></div>Ah, so the 82579V Ethernet controller and the SATA controller in AHCI mode.<br><br>and the dmesg?<br><br> </p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27884525</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27883196</link>
<description><![CDATA[BoogaBooga posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1484420" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1484420');">brad</a>:</said><p>Would you be able to provide dmesg output and "lspci -vv" output for the i3 system?<br> </p></div><pre class="brush: text">00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller (rev 09)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort+ &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Capabilities: &#91;e0&#93; Vendor Specific Information &lt;?&gt;&#012; &#012;00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 &#91;VGA controller&#93;)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=4M&#93;&#012;Region 2: Memory at e0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) &#91;size=256M&#93;&#012;Region 4: I/O ports at f000 &#91;size=64&#93;&#012;Expansion ROM at &lt;unassigned&gt; &#91;disabled&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;90&#93; MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-&#012;Address: 00000000  Data: 0000&#012;Capabilities: &#91;d0&#93; Power Management version 2&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;a4&#93; PCI Advanced Features&#012;AFCap: TP+ FLR+&#012;AFCtrl: FLR-&#012;AFStatus: TP-&#012; &#012;00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe525000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=16&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;50&#93; Power Management version 3&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;8c&#93; MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+&#012;Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000&#012; &#012;00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579V Gigabit Network Connection (rev 05)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 43&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe500000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=128K&#93;&#012;Region 1: Memory at fe524000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=4K&#93;&#012;Region 2: I/O ports at f080 &#91;size=32&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;c8&#93; Power Management version 2&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;d0&#93; MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+&#012;Address: 00000000fee0800c  Data: 4189&#012;Capabilities: &#91;e0&#93; PCI Advanced Features&#012;AFCap: TP+ FLR+&#012;AFCtrl: FLR-&#012;AFStatus: TP-&#012;Kernel driver in use: e1000e&#012; &#012;00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 05) (prog-if 20 &#91;EHCI&#93;)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe523000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=1K&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;50&#93; Power Management version 2&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;58&#93; Debug port: BAR=1 offset=00a0&#012;Capabilities: &#91;98&#93; PCI Advanced Features&#012;AFCap: TP+ FLR+&#012;AFCtrl: FLR-&#012;AFStatus: TP-&#012;Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd&#012; &#012;00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev b5) (prog-if 00 &#91;Normal decode&#93;)&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes&#012;Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0&#012;Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort+ &lt;SERR- &lt;PERR-&#012;BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- &gt;Reset- FastB2B-&#012;PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;40&#93; Express (v2) Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00&#012;DevCap:MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s &lt;64ns, L1 &lt;1us&#012;ExtTag- RBE+ FLReset-&#012;DevCtl:Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-&#012;RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-&#012;MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes&#012;DevSta:CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-&#012;LnkCap:Port #1, Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 &lt;1us, L1 &lt;4us&#012;ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep+ BwNot-&#012;LnkCtl:ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk-&#012;ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-&#012;LnkSta:Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x0, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-&#012;SltCap:AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug- Surpise-&#012;Slot #  0, PowerLimit 10.000000; Interlock- NoCompl+&#012;SltCtl:Enable: AttnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq- LinkChg-&#012;Control: AttnInd Unknown, PwrInd Unknown, Power- Interlock-&#012;SltSta:Status: AttnBtn- PowerFlt- MRL- CmdCplt- PresDet- Interlock-&#012;Changed: MRL- PresDet- LinkState-&#012;RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-&#012;RootCap: CRSVisible-&#012;RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-&#012;DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range BC, TimeoutDis+ ARIFwd-&#012;DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis- ARIFwd-&#012;LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB&#012; Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-&#012; Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB&#012;LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -3.5dB&#012;Capabilities: &#91;80&#93; MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-&#012;Address: fee0f00c  Data: 4151&#012;Capabilities: &#91;90&#93; Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Capabilities: &#91;a0&#93; Power Management version 2&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Kernel driver in use: pcieport&#012; &#012;00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev b5) (prog-if 00 &#91;Normal decode&#93;)&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes&#012;Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0&#012;Memory behind bridge: fe400000-fe4fffff&#012;Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort+ &lt;SERR- &lt;PERR-&#012;BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- &gt;Reset- FastB2B-&#012;PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;40&#93; Express (v2) Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00&#012;DevCap:MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s &lt;64ns, L1 &lt;1us&#012;ExtTag- RBE+ FLReset-&#012;DevCtl:Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-&#012;RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-&#012;MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes&#012;DevSta:CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-&#012;LnkCap:Port #2, Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM unknown, Latency L0 &lt;512ns, L1 &lt;4us&#012;ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep+ BwNot-&#012;LnkCtl:ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+&#012;ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-&#012;LnkSta:Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive+ BWMgmt+ ABWMgmt-&#012;SltCap:AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug- Surpise-&#012;Slot #  1, PowerLimit 10.000000; Interlock- NoCompl+&#012;SltCtl:Enable: AttnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq- LinkChg-&#012;Control: AttnInd Unknown, PwrInd Unknown, Power- Interlock-&#012;SltSta:Status: AttnBtn- PowerFlt- MRL- CmdCplt- PresDet+ Interlock-&#012;Changed: MRL- PresDet- LinkState+&#012;RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-&#012;RootCap: CRSVisible-&#012;RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-&#012;DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range BC, TimeoutDis+ ARIFwd-&#012;DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis- ARIFwd-&#012;LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB&#012; Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-&#012; Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB&#012;LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB&#012;Capabilities: &#91;80&#93; MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-&#012;Address: fee0f00c  Data: 4159&#012;Capabilities: &#91;90&#93; Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Capabilities: &#91;a0&#93; Power Management version 2&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Kernel driver in use: pcieport&#012; &#012;00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 05) (prog-if 20 &#91;EHCI&#93;)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 23&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe522000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=1K&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;50&#93; Power Management version 2&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;58&#93; Debug port: BAR=1 offset=00a0&#012;Capabilities: &#91;98&#93; PCI Advanced Features&#012;AFCap: TP+ FLR+&#012;AFCtrl: FLR-&#012;AFStatus: TP-&#012;Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd&#012; &#012;00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation H61 Express Chipset Family LPC Controller (rev 05)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Capabilities: &#91;e0&#93; Vendor Specific Information &lt;?&gt;&#012; &#012;00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family 6 port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) (prog-if 01 &#91;AHCI 1.0&#93;)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Latency: 0&#012;Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 42&#012;Region 0: I/O ports at f0d0 &#91;size=8&#93;&#012;Region 1: I/O ports at f0c0 &#91;size=4&#93;&#012;Region 2: I/O ports at f0b0 &#91;size=8&#93;&#012;Region 3: I/O ports at f0a0 &#91;size=4&#93;&#012;Region 4: I/O ports at f060 &#91;size=32&#93;&#012;Region 5: Memory at fe521000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=2K&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;80&#93; MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-&#012;Address: fee0a00c  Data: 4169&#012;Capabilities: &#91;70&#93; Power Management version 3&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;a8&#93; SATA HBA &lt;?&gt;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;b0&#93; PCI Advanced Features&#012;AFCap: TP+ FLR+&#012;AFCtrl: FLR-&#012;AFStatus: TP-&#012;Kernel driver in use: ahci&#012; &#012;00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family SMBus Controller (rev 05)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 11&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe520000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=256&#93;&#012;Region 4: I/O ports at f040 &#91;size=32&#93;&#012; &#012;02:00.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation uPD720200 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 04) (prog-if 30 &#91;XHCI&#93;)&#012;Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2013&#012;Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-&#012;Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast &gt;TAbort- &lt;TAbort- &lt;MAbort- &gt;SERR- &lt;PERR- INTx-&#012;Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 17&#012;Region 0: Memory at fe400000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) &#91;size=8K&#93;&#012;Capabilities: &#91;50&#93; Power Management version 3&#012;Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)&#012;Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;70&#93; MSI: Enable- Count=1/8 Maskable- 64bit+&#012;Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000&#012;Capabilities: &#91;90&#93; MSI-X: Enable- Count=8 Masked-&#012;Vector table: BAR=0 offset=00001000&#012;PBA: BAR=0 offset=00001080&#012;Capabilities: &#91;a0&#93; Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00&#012;DevCap:MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited&#012;ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset-&#012;DevCtl:Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-&#012;RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+&#012;MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes&#012;DevSta:CorrErr+ UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr+ TransPend-&#012;LnkCap:Port #0, Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 &lt;4us, L1 unlimited&#012;ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-&#012;LnkCtl:ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+&#012;ExtSynch- ClockPM+ AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-&#012;LnkSta:Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-&#012;DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Not Supported, TimeoutDis+&#012;DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-&#012;LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB&#012; Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-&#012; Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB&#012;LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB&#012;Capabilities: &#91;100&#93; Advanced Error Reporting&#012;UESta:DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-&#012;UEMsk:DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-&#012;UESvrt:DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-&#012;CESta:RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr+&#012;CEMsk:RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr+&#012;AERCap:First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap- CGenEn- ChkCap- ChkEn-&#012;Capabilities: &#91;140&#93; Device Serial Number ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff&#012;Capabilities: &#91;150&#93; Latency Tolerance Reporting&#012;Max snoop latency: 0ns&#012;Max no snoop latency: 0ns&#012; &#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block-->]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27883196</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:47:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27882969</link>
<description><![CDATA[DSL_Ricer posted : 192.95.24.140 seems to be on their network (no that address is not mine, I do have one though).<br><br>They have a network diagram with router and peer names, and current link utilization at:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://weathermap.ovh.net/usa" >weathermap.ovh.net/usa</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27882969</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:31:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: OVH pricing at Montreal datacenter is... insane?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27881091</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1023414" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1023414');">BoogaBooga</a>:</said><p>I also got their i3 8gb server. Its definitely worth the price. Performance seems very consistent. <br><br>Note that they use custom kernels for Linux (with modules disabled) which means that you will have to re-compile the kernel if you want to enable some modules. <br> </p></div>Having modules disabled by default is a better default security stance.<br><br>Would you be able to provide dmesg output and "lspci -vv" output for the i3 system?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OVH-pricing-at-Montreal-datacenter-is-insane-27881091</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:13:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
