dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
284

FFH5
Premium Member
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ

FFH5

Premium Member

Police can track users mooching on neighbors open APs

A Federal Court has ruled that users using a neighbors open WiFi AP do not have an expectation of privacy and can be located by police without using a search warrant.

»blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/1 ··· warrant/

A federal court in Pittsburgh has ruled that the government can track you to your location, sans search warrant, using free anti-moocher software.

The courts have ruled that Internet subscribers have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their IP address

Pittsburgh ruling, made earlier this month, is the first to address the privacy rights of people who piggyback on their neighbors’ unsecured wireless networks.

In the Pittsburgh case, police used a program called Moocherhunter and a directional antenna to find a man suspected of downloading child pornography. The program allows users to measure the distance between a wireless router and the devices connected to it.

Someone nearby, a neighbor maybe, had been mooching the subscriber’s wireless Internet and using the connection to download child pornography, they reckoned.

Police used Moocherhunter to find other devices connected to the subscriber’s wireless router, which led them to Richard Stanley, who lived across the street from the subscriber. Police then used the Moocherhunter information to obtain a warrant to search Mr. Stanley’s home, and based on evidence they found, Mr. Stanley was indicted in November 2011 for possessing child pornography.

Mr. Stanley sought to suppress the evidence, arguing that police needed a warrant to use Moocherhunter to locate him. U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti found that Mr. Stanley “could have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the signal he was sending to or receiving” from the wireless router.

CXM_Splicer
Looking at the bigger picture
Premium Member
join:2011-08-11
NYC

CXM_Splicer

Premium Member

I would tend to agree with this and say it is about time police stopped busting in doors to do investigative work. Hopefully, the software (and the police) are accurate enough to properly ID the suspected house. I would also say that they should have to keep records of 'false positives' and if there are too many then they shouldn't be using this method.