<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Satellite&#x27; in forum &#x27;Windstream&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Satellite-27759360</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:32:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:32:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27761588</link>
<description><![CDATA[wheelbarrow posted : Right. Wireless is really only an option for people who don't use a lot of bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27761588</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:47:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27760658</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bodybagger posted : Only prob with wireless is the low data caps. One 20gig WoW patch and you're done. Satellite is useless for gaming or anything that takes constant sending and receiving of information in a timely manner. Heard dialup is better for gaming than sat.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27760658</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:14:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27760181</link>
<description><![CDATA[malianx posted : I get <1mbit 90% of the day and ping spikes of 2000ms even then. It can't be worse than that?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27760181</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 05:17:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27759911</link>
<description><![CDATA[wheelbarrow posted : Verizon 4G LTE would be a better option for most, if it's available.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27759911</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:59:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27759680</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cuzinshaggy posted : The latency is horrible on satellite.  If it weren't I would use it myself!  Hell, I'd like to get that 1mb most of you get!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Satellite-27759680</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:20:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Satellite-27759360</link>
<description><![CDATA[malianx posted : Wouldn't satellite connections be better out in the rural areas where some of us are getting <1mbit most of the day? Or is the latency too high on that kind of connection to be usable for anything like gaming, voip, video conference?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Satellite-27759360</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:08:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
