<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Service Providers&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759494</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:59:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:59:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27781002</link>
<description><![CDATA[Semaphore posted : Well ya can do that but you gotta bring them some decent beer and a couple pairs of wool socks too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27781002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:04:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27769820</link>
<description><![CDATA[Inssomniak posted : I appreciate all the information, but this idea isn't going to go thru, it was going to be possibly used to shoot a link from a hydro power plant (or near it) back to my main PoP but they can't do it. :(<br><br>Good info to know going forward though.<br><small>--<br>OptionsDSL Wireless Internet<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.optionsdsl.ca" >www.optionsdsl.ca</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27769820</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:56:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27768535</link>
<description><![CDATA[battleop posted : It's not a pain in the ass if you let your distributor do all of the paperwork and filings.   If you are doing a small number of links it's worth letting them do everything.  If you get to the point where you do a lot of links then it would be worth learning to do everything your self.<br><br>+++1 on the SAF stuff.  We tried them out when they were pretty much unknown company in North America and I could not be more pleased with their product and support.  I did some 8 mile 11Ghz links that have been in the air for 2+ years trouble free.  <br><br>I would be concerned about a link on a tower that twists.<br><small>--<br>I do not, have not, and will not work for AT&T/Comcast/Verizon/Charter or similar sized company.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27768535</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:05:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27768246</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rhaas posted : Wait, you have to prove you're canukian??<br><br>You just can't walk in and say I'm canadian eh!?<br><small>--<br>I survived Hale-Bopp!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27768246</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:55:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27767403</link>
<description><![CDATA[Inssomniak posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/901298" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=901298');">Semaphore</a>:</said><p>IC Licencing process is not that bad.  Biggest challenge is proving Canadian ownership.  Once you've done that once you don't need to do it again so the process gets a LOT easier. <br> </p></div>Im going thru that process right now :(<br><small>--<br>OptionsDSL Wireless Internet<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.optionsdsl.ca" >www.optionsdsl.ca</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27767403</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:20:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27767391</link>
<description><![CDATA[Semaphore posted : IC Licencing process is not that bad.  Biggest challenge is proving Canadian ownership.  Once you've done that once you don't need to do it again so the process gets a LOT easier. I did it myself, but usually the vendor or VAR will do it for you.  Bigger issue is the probably cost of such a high amount of BW since iCan's licencing is not based on today's reality as far as speeds go.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27767391</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:17:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759741</link>
<description><![CDATA[wirelessdog posted : Beat me to it. It could be done in 5.4 with 4' dishes for 200megs aggregate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759741</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:41:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759735</link>
<description><![CDATA[AMD Phreak posted : Shouldn't be a pain. IC should be like FCC. I would think your supplier of hardware should be able to help you file. If not I am sure there has to be someone here who can provide some insight. <br><br>As for the twist, yes possibly but the twist is going to mess up even 5.4GHz<br><br>Either way you should go licensed. Based on the link distance and throughput requirements and full duplex it's the only way you can meet all of them. <br><br>PTP600 is capable but it's going to need big dishes to do. Big dish means more twist. <br><small>--<br>"Above all, I would teach him to tell the truth. Truth-telling, I have found, is the key to responsible citizenship. The thousands of criminals I have seen in 40 years of law enforcement have had one thing in common: Every single one was a liar."<br>J.E.H.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759735</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:38:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759722</link>
<description><![CDATA[Inssomniak posted : I did look at SAF as well but is the licensing a pain in the ass? (IC)<br><br>I should have added that my tower has a fair bit of twist in it. Will that make it useless for 11ghz?  <br><small>--<br>OptionsDSL Wireless Internet<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.optionsdsl.ca" >www.optionsdsl.ca</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759722</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:33:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759718</link>
<description><![CDATA[AMD Phreak posted : 11 KM full duplex?<br><br>11GHz. Done and done. <br><br>Look at SAF or Dragonwave. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759718</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:31:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759573</link>
<description><![CDATA[LLigetfa posted : What size dishes to go 11 KM with 5.4/5.2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759573</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759559</link>
<description><![CDATA[wirelessdog posted : No 5.4/5.2? Thinking Moto Orthogon or whatever its called now has a low-band option with those speeds.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759559</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:28:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>120 megabit FD link, no 5.8ghz left</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759494</link>
<description><![CDATA[Inssomniak posted : <br>Open to suggestions on a link for 120 megabits, Little over 11,000 meters.  No 5.8ghz spectrum left at one end.   I know about the AirFiber but the 11km link part scares me.  <br><small>--<br>OptionsDSL Wireless Internet<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.optionsdsl.ca" >www.optionsdsl.ca</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/120-megabit-FD-link-no-58ghz-left-27759494</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:04:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
