dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
936
share rss forum feed
« The People
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · next

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker

Re: Corruption

It sure does.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
The whole point of a conflict of interest is it doesn't matter.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
My point was, who's conflict of interest it is.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9

said by openbox9 See Profile]
I'm done with this silly discussion.

:

Declaring that a former regulator lobbying his old office is not a conflict of interest does make for a silly discussion.

Bizarre really.


openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
Umm, I can argue the same about you.

I'm done with this silly discussion.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
It is extremely obvious you don't know what a conflict of interest is.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
said by DataRiker:

Do I really have to explain this??

Apparently so, because if that's occurring, it's not his conflict of interest, it's his former officemates'.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000

4 edits
reply to openbox9
Do you really think he goes through normal channels when dealing with his former office???? The same normal channels others people/companies are forced to go through.

Is that not a conflict of interest??? Do I really have to explain this??

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
Obviously this discussion is going nowhere. You're focusing on something that may have happened, not what is currently occurring.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
Yet you don't see the conflict of interest.

Makes sense......

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
I'm not defending it. In fact, I posted previously an option/suggestion to prevent regulators from moving to private industry in the same regulatory sector.

Don't tell me I don't understand something. You don't know me and it's flat out rude.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000

1 edit
reply to openbox9
said by openbox9:

I understand the situation just fine.

No you absolutely don't.

I know people of every variety of political background and this is probably the universal ire of any American. The circular path between regulators and lobbyist. It is absolutely wrong on a grand scale.

It is unbelievable that anybody under any circumstance could defend it.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
I don't need to get warmer. I understand the situation just fine.

I stated it a couple of times in this thread already, but I'll say it one more time. He doesn't currently have a conflict of interest as was implied. Any potential conflict of interest would've occurred during his last appointment.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
said by openbox9:

He may have had a conflict of interest as a commissioner if he was working on securing his current job through promises and favors.

Your getting warmer

Do you think he was given his current job because he is such a good guy?

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
Sorry you can't seem to understand that he had a job then and he has a different job now. That does not guarantee a conflict of interest. IMO, he can't have a conflict of interest now. He's done with his regulatory authority. He may have had a conflict of interest as a commissioner if he was working on securing his current job through promises and favors.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
He regulated the very company he is working for. Sorry you don't understand.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
Because you can't? You have yet to explain any conflict of interest. The man left public service for a private company in a business sector that he was knowledgeable of. If he gave favors as a commissioner with promise of future employment, then you have an argument.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
This is too silly to even argue.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
You don't need feel sorry for me for anything. I explain my positions and I'll stand by them until someone is able to convince me otherwise. You haven't, yet.

Wouldn't the conflict of interest, if it existed, have occurred while he was at the FCC?

said by Dictionary.com :

conflict of interest
noun
1. the circumstance of a public officeholder, business executive, or the like, whose personal interests might benefit from his or her official actions or influence: The senator placed his stocks in trust to avoid possible conflict of interest.

2. the circumstance of a person who finds that one of his or her activities, interests, etc., can be advanced only at the expense of another of them.



DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
I actually feel sorry for you having to defend such ridiculous positions.

Saying you don't see a conflict of interest ( which this is the very definition of ) is so over the top, nobody can take you seriously.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
Morality loses every time. Unethical? Maybe. Slimy? Politics. Wrong? Your perspective.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
As far as I'm concerned there is no "IF". Taking a lobbying position from a company you were supposed to regulate is immoral, unethical, slimy, and just plain wrong.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to CXM_Splicer
"If" That's why corruption is difficult to demonstrate/prove. The accusations are full of conjecture and hyperbole.

One way to prevent this "corruption" is to pay our public representatives/regulators significantly more money with tons of benefits and a nice healthy pension above what they already receive. Then prevent them from further employment once they leave public office.

I simply do not see that happening.

CXM_Splicer
Looking at the bigger picture
Premium
join:2011-08-11
NYC
kudos:2
reply to openbox9
It would be a conflict of interest if he used his former position of power to influence people that he used to work with or his connections to pull strings that others don't have access to. Lets face it, anyone with half a brain knows that is exactly why he was hired as a lobbyist.

It would also be corruption if he made 'arrangements' for this new job while he was still in office which included (for instance) reducing the regulatory authority of the agency.

Would you have a problem if the AFL/CIO started offering the Secretary of Dept of Labor a multimillion dollar lobbying position for when she retired? And then she in fact took it?

Not only does this smell but it is more proof that our entire political system stinks to high hell.

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
He has a different job now. It smells just fine. You may not like his positions or arguments, but I'm hard pressed to see a conflict of interest.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000

1 edit

1 recommendation

reply to FFH5
said by FFH5:

It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasury.

Funny you never mention that about our Defense industry, and its best friend the State Department which has spent enough money in the past decades to give every American a house and health care 5 times over.

And yet we have nothing to show for it but more enemies.


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000
reply to openbox9
said by openbox9:

How is that corruption?

Are you serious? Its an enormous conflict of interest, not to mention suggests serious lapses of partiality and ethics.

I can't believe you even suggest this passes the smell test.


cork1958
Cork
Premium
join:2000-02-26
reply to old_wiz_60
said by old_wiz_60:

Absolutely! I wonder how much he was promised or paid while still working for the FCC? ALL government agencies are so corrupt that it's hard to figure out which ones are honest. The FCC and DOJ are certainly not honest.

Fixed that for you by just changing one lousy word!!
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

openbox9
Premium
join:2004-01-26
Germany
kudos:2
reply to DataRiker
How is that corruption? He transitioned from one career to another. He's simply touting his employer's party line. Now, if you can point to activities that demonstrate actual corruption while he was an FCC commissioner, then you'll be on to something.


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
reply to pizz
EVERYONE should pitch in not just people making more than $250k. The 1% didn't get into the 1% by being stupid. If you try and make them pay more just because they are in the 1% they will figure out a way to pass it right back to the 99%.
--
I do not, have not, and will not work for AT&T/Comcast/Verizon/Charter or similar sized company.