El QuintronResident Mouth BreatherPremiumReviews:
|reply to Content |
Re: New Canadian Bittorrent lawsuit: Who shared "Recoil&quo
This is back to the Geist post; but this is what the government is stating:
quote:At first glance it looks like they're going to treat copyright infringement like a speeding ticket...
Similarly, Conservative MP Ron Cannon stated:
Our government also understands the difference between a large-scale violator and an ordinary consumer. The legislation introduces the concept of proportionality in statutory damages. It revises current provisions for statutory damages to distinguish between commercial and non-commercial infringement. That is very important. This bill reduces an individual's potential liability in cases of non-commercial infringement to a one-time payment of between $100 and $5,000 for all infringements that took place prior to any lawsuit being launched.
With rights holders are obviously entitled to pursue their claims in court (and seek either actual or statutory damages), the statutory damages provisions in Canada are clearly designed to dissuade them from pursuing lawsuits against individuals in non-commercial cases. If Canadians begin to receive settlement demand letters, they should be aware of the recent changes that limit their liability in light of the government's view that huge payment demands for non-commercial infringement are "way out of line."
Support Bacteria -- It's the Only Culture Some People Have