dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
915
share rss forum feed

dencalatl

join:2012-07-21
Roswell, GA

High Latency to first hop

I started having problems with streaming applications last march after ~3 years no issues with my Uverse Data connection. Have since upgraded to the highest tier (Max Turbo?) without any improvement. Here is a copy of line quality test. I notice that my total latency is always from 58 to 90 ms, and always shows a warning about my 1st Hop latency. When I look at other SBC dslreports, I see most have total 15 to 22 ms latency. So any opinions as to what is going on here? BTW I ** out the last few digits of my IP address.

1 minute MTR (hop loss analysis) from Central - USA
Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst
0 ae-1.bb-c.slr.lxa.us.oneandone.net 0% 60 60 0.29 0.34 0.39
1 ae-10.bb-c.ms.mkc.us.oneandone.net 0% 60 60 0.75 0.81 0.88
2 64.209.105.233 0% 60 60 13.93 21.65 220.47
3 192.205.33.245 0% 60 60 14.62 14.98 15.73
4 cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 36.86 38.76 40.77
5 cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 36.83 38.69 40.88
6 cr1.cl2oh.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 37.35 39.90 58.52
7 cr2.nsvtn.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 37.98 40.77 65.12
8 cr1.nsvtn.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 37.55 39.87 44.31
9 cr2.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 37.90 40.21 44.79
10 gar1.atmga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 37.33 39.40 41.66
11 ??? 100% 0 60 0.00 0.00 0.00
12 76.201.208.132 99% 1 60 44.62 44.62 44.62
13 76.201.208.101 85% 9 60 38.15 40.01 49.86
14 76.201.208.45 74% 16 60 38.35 39.99 49.55
15 99-170-**.**.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net 2% 59 60 59.19 60.22 61.87

dencalatl

join:2012-07-21
Roswell, GA

Re: High Latency to first hop (up to 90 ms)

BTW tests from West Coast server are much worse.

1 minute MTR (hop loss analysis) from West Coast - USA
Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst
0 ??? 100% 0 60 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 ge-2-0-0-0.c01.sjc.bb.megapath.net 0% 60 60 0.82 7.42 107.38
2 ge-6-16.car2.SanJose1.Level3.net 0% 60 60 0.80 13.69 183.41
3 ae-1-60.edge2.SanJose1.Level3.net 0% 60 60 0.80 1.85 27.88
4 192.205.32.209 0% 60 60 3.54 5.61 7.83
5 cr2.sffca.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 72.58 74.54 80.25
6 cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 71.79 75.19 90.80
7 cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 71.18 73.64 78.72
8 cr1.attga.ip.att.net 0% 60 60 71.79 74.07 77.50
9 12.122.29.21 0% 60 60 71.34 73.35 77.32
10 ??? 100% 0 60 0.00 0.00 0.00
11 76.201.208.130 97% 2 60 72.32 75.28 78.24
12 76.201.208.99 99% 1 60 76.35 76.35 76.35
13 76.201.208.29 87% 8 60 72.43 75.15 90.46
14 99-170-**.**.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net 2% 59 60 93.12 94.13 95.40
[pass]


NormanS
I gave her time to steal my mind away
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:11
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

I am sorry, but I can't see your first hop latency problem with a reverse path trace. Perhaps you could provide a link to the results page?

Should have all of the following information:

»/pingtest/2224···/2967698
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


dencalatl

join:2012-07-21
Roswell, GA

Thanks for letting me know what you needed. Here is the link to one of the Line Quality tests.
»/pingtest/3233···85?r=778