<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;[Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs Single/Dual 96 MHz Tuner?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Comcast HSI&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27781597</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:00:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:00:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs Single/Dual 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27792066</link>
<description><![CDATA[Darknessfall posted : What are your signals like? Since getting the DPC3008 my power levels went from 1.6-3.3 to 3.2-6.7 dBmV and SNR went from 35-38 to 40]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27792066</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:10:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs Single/Dual 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27791927</link>
<description><![CDATA[PhReE5 posted : I have the DPC3008 and do pretty heavy usage in both directions and I havent had a single issue. I am on the new May 2012 firmware as well. When I bought it, it had the older firmware, but it auto updated itself when I hooked it up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27791927</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:24:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs single 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27787779</link>
<description><![CDATA[Darknessfall posted : Well, I ordered the DPC3008 right now. I had the SB6141 ordered but $40 more wasn't worth it to me lol. If it doesn't work right then I guess I can always send it back :P.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27787779</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:55:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs single 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27785603</link>
<description><![CDATA[Darknessfall posted : Thanks Telco for your responses :). I always like how you leave links to things on your posts and keep things updated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27785603</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:42:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs single 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27785562</link>
<description><![CDATA[telcodad posted : According to the latest reports I've seen on the DPC3008, it looks like the update to the May 2012 version of the firmware may have resolved the issues.<br><br>See: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27715662-Upgraded-from-DOCSIS-2-to-3-Speeds-plummeted">Re: Upgraded from DOCSIS 2 to 3, Speeds plummeted</A><br>and:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r27588628-sb6141-sb6180-zoom5341-dpc3010">Re: sb6141, sb6180, zoom5341, dpc3010</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27785562</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:29:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs single 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27785545</link>
<description><![CDATA[Darknessfall posted : Is the DPC3008 still having issues on the newest build they released? Anyone hear of the problems occurring on a Cisco CMTS?<br>The Comcast thread seemed to have settled down lately.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27785545</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:21:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs single 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27781652</link>
<description><![CDATA[telcodad posted : Well, if you're talking Broadcom DOCSIS 3.0 chipsets: <br><br>The "first generation" Broadcom BCM3380 chipset used an "Integrated 64-MHz wideband receiver with two independent 32-MHz blocks." (&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.broadcom.com/products/Cable/Cable-Modem-Solutions/BCM3380" >www.broadcom.com/products/Cable/&middot;&middot;&middot;/BCM3380</A>)<br><br>The next, "new and improved" Broadcom BCM3382 chipset used "a second generation integrated wideband tuner, with an extended bandwidth of 96MHz." (&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.broadcom.com/products/Cable/Cable-Modem-Solutions/BCM3382" >www.broadcom.com/products/Cable/&middot;&middot;&middot;/BCM3382</A>)<br><br>So it's better to have a "single 96 MHz tuner" in your modem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-single-96-MHz-Tuner-27781652</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:49:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Connectivity] Dual 32 MHz vs Single/Dual 96 MHz Tuner?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27781597</link>
<description><![CDATA[Darknessfall posted : Is there any difference between modems using either? Is one better? One worse?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Connectivity-Dual-32-MHz-vs-SingleDual-96-MHz-Tuner-27781597</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:28:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
