...or it could be the fact that the technology is in fact capable of lower pings. People just complain about the interleaving because it hurts their e-penis.

(Though U-verse doesn't always have the best routing, which can contribute to higher latency as well, so I guess I am "lucky" in that aspect.)

actions · 2012-Dec-2 11:54 pm ·

profane
join:2010-10-10
Livonia, MI

profane

Member

2012-Dec-3 1:39 am

Yea...you are lucky. Have a look at this without doing this

actions · 2012-Dec-3 1:39 am ·

Nuckfuts
Premium Member
join:2003-10-18
Joliet, IL

Nuckfuts

Premium Member

2012-Dec-3 7:36 am

It could be bad routing from your area. This is what I got. Have you done a trace route?

actions · 2012-Dec-3 7:36 am ·

DataRiker
Premium Member
join:2002-05-19
00000

DataRiker

Premium Member

2012-Dec-3 10:52 am

40 to 50 ms is very typical of uverse. I've put in hundreds and I've actually never seen a sub 30 ms ping. So take from that what u will.

They use different fiber cards in some areas so that would probably explain some of the discrepancy.

actions · 2012-Dec-3 10:52 am ·

profane
join:2010-10-10
Livonia, MI

profane to Nuckfuts

Member

2012-Dec-3 8:58 pm

to Nuckfuts

said by Nuckfuts:

It could be bad routing from your area. This is what I got. Have you done a trace route?

Yes, it's hit or miss with those. Sometimes they're decent, sometimes they're really craphouse. There's even been a couple times where it would time out on the RG.

actions · 2012-Dec-3 8:58 pm ·

Forums → US ISPs non-cable → AT&T U-verse	« Motorola VIP2100 Coming To UVerse? Status of VIP2200? • Page cannot be displayed »
This is a sub-selection from New U-Verse HSI install jitter issues