dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
19

OSUGoose
join:2007-12-27
Columbus, OH
Apple AirPort Extreme (2013)

OSUGoose to me1212

Member

to me1212

Re: So

No it wouldn't, as it would be a unwarranted invasion of privacy, doesn't change that the act is wrong, but there should not be a 3rd party observing, plus imagine the lawsuit if the girl was legal age, but just looked young/underage.

Or could someone self pleasuring get charged with indecent exposure since the "monitor" of the feed the DVR pickups was subjected to it.

I mean there are all kinds of Pandora box esque things a thing like this opens up on both sides.
me1212
join:2008-11-20
Lees Summit, MO

me1212

Member

Agreed, we need to put a stop to this BS some how. I don't want this crap in my house at all.

The saddest part is, the kids growing up now will see this as normal, and not resist it when they are adults.

tshirt
Premium Member
join:2004-07-11
Snohomish, WA

tshirt to OSUGoose

Premium Member

to OSUGoose
Suppose someone watching alone had a medical emergency and asked/begged for help.
would the provider be allowed to send help?
would they be liable if they ignored the problem?
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

patcat88

Member

Yes. After the tv injury lawyers are done.

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium Member
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs

N3OGH to OSUGoose

Premium Member

to OSUGoose
Click for full size
It's come to this....

chip89
Premium Member
join:2012-07-05
Columbia Station, OH

chip89

Premium Member

It looks like Verizon is now paying cats to watch us now.

OSUGoose
join:2007-12-27
Columbus, OH

OSUGoose

Member

Cats I wouldn't mind, or a dog.