<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783637</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:58:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:58:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27785880</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : I've seen 22ms on HSPA+ with T-Mobile. Granted, that was to a website in Denver from an aircard in Golden, but I haven't seen LTE latency to local sites below 30ms, though I'm not complaining with 30ms.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27785880</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:53:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27785144</link>
<description><![CDATA[brad posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1440579" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1440579');">iansltx</a>:</said><p>As JigglyWiggly says, latency is significantly better on LTE vs. HSPA+, at least the way AT&T is doing H+ (for T-Mobile latency is comparable to LTE on H+ depending on the area).<br><br>Also, I'll compare upload speeds any day of the week between your H+ and my LTE...LTE will win every time. 1.5 Mbps vs. 5+ Mbps.<br> </p></div>There is something seriously wrong on the LTE side if you're seeing similar latency vs the HSPA+ network. HSPA+ cannot match LTE for latency.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27785144</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:59:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27784986</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mizzat posted : It get easier in one tower towns, rather than the bigger, more populated where there are more towers....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27784986</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:02:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27784876</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : As JigglyWiggly says, latency is significantly better on LTE vs. HSPA+, at least the way AT&T is doing H+ (for T-Mobile latency is comparable to LTE on H+ depending on the area).<br><br>Also, I'll compare upload speeds any day of the week between your H+ and my LTE...LTE will win every time. 1.5 Mbps vs. 5+ Mbps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27784876</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:30:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783812</link>
<description><![CDATA[JigglyWiggly posted : Still no LTE in Merced California =/<br>LTE ping times are too epic en103, I was playing quake live with 40ms ping when moving at 80 MILES per hour. Friend was driving and I was playing quake live.<br>It was rediculous<br><br>I get 20ms to 4.2.2.1 on lte]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783812</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:14:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783712</link>
<description><![CDATA[en103 posted : Very true... however, I still get 6-12Mbps on 'faux G' on AT&T just about wherever I go, so I don't really care if I have LTE or not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783712</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:53:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783666</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783666</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:42:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;T is deploying LTE... kind of....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783637</link>
<description><![CDATA[IPPlanMan posted : Compared to Verizon's LTE rollout in the last year (now in 441 cities)... this is a pretty pathetic effort by AT&T ...<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://network4g.verizonwireless.com/#/infographic" >network4g.verizonwireless.com/#/infographic</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/ATT-is-deploying-LTE-kind-of-27783637</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:35:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
