Topic 'Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router' in forum 'AT&T Midwest' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27784050 en Thu, 23 May 2013 03:32:08 EDT Thu, 23 May 2013 03:32:08 EDT Re: Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27788004 said by mattrixx:

Not yet dealing with this switch over to U-Verse and it`s "Gateway", I think I understand what you are saying is just connect my router`s WAN port (presently connected to ATT DSL Modem) to an open LAN connection on the "Gateway"?

Yes, that's correct. But first make sure that the range of LAN addresses on your own router is different from the range of LAN addresses on the gateway. You can change that range on either device.
--
AT&T Uverse; Zyxel NBG334W router (behind the 2wire gateway); openSuSE 12.2; firefox 17.0]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27788004 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:55:09 EDT Re: Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27787928
Not yet dealing with this switch over to U-Verse and it`s "Gateway", I think I understand what you are saying is just connect my router`s WAN port (presently connected to ATT DSL Modem) to an open LAN connection on the "Gateway"?

As you might have guessed, I am not too familiar with all of this, having been originally setup for Broadband DSL many years now, and being content with typical Modem and Router configuration.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27787928 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:38:13 EDT Re: Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27787829 said by mattrixx:

Could you be more specific regarding the actual connection and config?

When I first got u-verse, I set up my router as "a router behind the router". That 2Wire terminology. I set it up to share the public IP of the gateway. I used it that way for a year.

Then I switched to the current way of using it. I disabled the "router behind router" check in 3800 HGV gateway. I connected the WAN port of my router to the gateway. The gateway used IP addresses 192.168.1.* on it's lan, so my own router got an IP of that form for its WAN address. And I have my router set to use 192.168.254.* on its LAN.

If I want to forward a port (I do forward port 22 for example), then on the gateway, I forward that to my router, and on my router I forward that to the particular computer that I want to handle incoming connections.

The reasons that I switched - basically, it works better this way. With my router sharing the public IP, "traceroute" (from linux) did not work though "tracert" from windows worked. With the second level router setup, both work. The immediate problem that caused me to switch, was that my router was losing connection every two or three days. After a firmware update to the gateway, the DHCP lease renewal was less reliable for a router configured to share the public IP.
--
AT&T Uverse; Zyxel NBG334W router (behind the 2wire gateway); openSuSE 12.2; firefox 17.0]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27787829 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:09:09 EDT Re: Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27787354 said by nwrickert:

Or you could just connect your router as a second level router (that's how I do it).

What exactly do you mean "second level router"? Could you be more specific regarding the actual connection and config?

Thanks for your original reply. Any further insight into this matter would be greatly appreciated.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27787354 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:53:11 EDT Re: Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27786364
The 3800 HGV gateway has a provision for one client to share the public IP address. You would use that for your router. Or you could just connect your router as a second level router (that's how I do it).

The second method should work for any gateway. The first method should work for any 2Wire gateway, but I'm not sure about other gateways that are used.
--
AT&T Uverse; Zyxel NBG334W router (behind the 2wire gateway); openSuSE 12.2; firefox 17.0]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27786364 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:27:14 EDT Question about ATT "Gateway" and 3rd. party Router http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27784050 I also understand ATT would really like to eliminate all legacy DSL users and provide them instead with U-Verse.

My question is: Can I continue to use my Asus RT-N66U Router with ATTs U-Verse "Gateway" modem/router, and If so how is this accomplished with or without any ATT "Gateway"?

Thanks]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Question-about-ATT-quotGatewayquot-and-3rd-party-Router-27784050 Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:56:32 EDT