openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
to DataRiker
Re: CorruptionI don't need to get warmer. I understand the situation just fine.
I stated it a couple of times in this thread already, but I'll say it one more time. He doesn't currently have a conflict of interest as was implied. Any potential conflict of interest would've occurred during his last appointment. |
|
1 edit |
said by openbox9:I understand the situation just fine. No you absolutely don't. I know people of every variety of political background and this is probably the universal ire of any American. The circular path between regulators and lobbyist. It is absolutely wrong on a grand scale. It is unbelievable that anybody under any circumstance could defend it. |
|
openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
openbox9
Premium Member
2012-Dec-3 8:00 pm
I'm not defending it. In fact, I posted previously an option/suggestion to prevent regulators from moving to private industry in the same regulatory sector.
Don't tell me I don't understand something. You don't know me and it's flat out rude. |
|
|
Yet you don't see the conflict of interest.
Makes sense...... |
|
openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
openbox9
Premium Member
2012-Dec-4 12:37 am
Obviously this discussion is going nowhere. You're focusing on something that may have happened, not what is currently occurring. |
|
4 edits |
Do you really think he goes through normal channels when dealing with his former office???? The same normal channels others people/companies are forced to go through.
Is that not a conflict of interest??? Do I really have to explain this?? |
|
openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
openbox9
Premium Member
2012-Dec-4 6:54 am
said by DataRiker:Do I really have to explain this?? Apparently so, because if that's occurring, it's not his conflict of interest, it's his former officemates'. |
|
|
It is extremely obvious you don't know what a conflict of interest is. |
|
openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
openbox9
Premium Member
2012-Dec-4 7:28 pm
Umm, I can argue the same about you.
I'm done with this silly discussion. |
|
|
said by openbox9 ] I'm done with this silly discussion. : Declaring that a former regulator lobbying his old office is not a conflict of interest does make for a silly discussion.
Bizarre really. |
|
openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
openbox9
Premium Member
2012-Dec-4 10:05 pm
My point was, who's conflict of interest it is. |
|
|
The whole point of a conflict of interest is it doesn't matter. |
|
openbox9 Premium Member join:2004-01-26 71144 |
openbox9
Premium Member
2012-Dec-4 10:22 pm
It sure does. |
|