 | Recommendation for local church? - 4 lines I'm looking to help out a local church(non-profit of course) with their telephone costs these days. The phones have very light usage and 99% of the calls currently are local phone calls since people know to use their cell for long distance. They currently have 4 land lines. 2 are connected to a plain jane 2 line office system with about 3 or 4 extensions. The 2 lines are setup in a rollover situation or some know it as a hunt group if I remember correctly from my voip days. Another line is dedicated to the FAX machine. And another line is connected to a separate building.
My ultimate goal would be to replace their 4 lines with something that works about the same but with less monthly charges of course I'm not sure if I would be able to hook up to the separate building since there is no internet out there from the main building. I believe the phone line goes directly to it as well so that might be separate or I might have to look into shooting some wifi across the parking lot to an ATA. Or maybe even just go to a multi-phone cordless system if it would reach.
I haven't kept up with the VoIP stuff these days but is there something out there that I could implement for these guys cheaply?
I'm also going to have to figure out if I can get dry-loop DSL if we end up cancelling the lines completely. They currently have 6000/512 DSL. So maybe the FAX line or separate building line might just stay if AT&T gives me a fight... |
|
 TrevIP Telephony AddictPremium join:2009-06-29 Victoria, BC kudos:4 | The most important question you need to ask yourself is if you want to become their 'phone guy' and handle any problem that ever comes up with their new system or not.
Once you've determined that, we can give you more relevant recommendations.
For your secondary building - is the electrical on it's own connection or does it come from the main building? -- Wondering what I do? Find out at »www.digitalcon.ca Get your Obihai ATA in Canada. |
|
 Mangowww.toao.net join:2008-12-25 Alberta kudos:11 Reviews:
·Anveo
·Shaw
·AcroVoice
·Callcentric
·callwithus
·voip.ms
·FreePhoneLine
·TELUS
| reply to digiblur said by digiblur:They currently have 6000/512 DSL. You will need some fairly aggressive QoS rules to make this work. Assuming it runs at its rated speed, (512 * 80%) - (90 * 4) = 50 kilobits per second left for regular internet traffic with four calls in progress.
Another option is dedicating an internet connection to VoIP, which may still be cost effective.
m. -- Dear Obihai, please fix the FXS to FXO Relay in the OBi110. Add this as your signature if you agree! |
|
 | reply to Trev said by Trev:The most important question you need to ask yourself is if you want to become their 'phone guy' and handle any problem that ever comes up with their new system or not.
Once you've determined that, we can give you more relevant recommendations.
For your secondary building - is the electrical on it's own connection or does it come from the main building? Yes, that would be me. |
|
 | reply to Mango said by Mango:said by digiblur:They currently have 6000/512 DSL. You will need some fairly aggressive QoS rules to make this work. Assuming it runs at its rated speed, (512 * 80%) - (90 * 4) = 50 kilobits per second left for regular internet traffic with four calls in progress. Another option is dedicating an internet connection to VoIP, which may still be cost effective. m. Yep, I had full intentions of doing that. Their router is ancient and I would be replacing that as well to do some proper QOS rules. Most of the time no more than 2 calls are active though but you always have to plan for the worst. If 4 phones are being burned then 50 left on the upload is not a problem.
I also thought about a dedicated line for just VOIP and not have to deal with QOS at all. All part of my cost analysis. |
|
 kaila join:2000-10-11 Lincolnshire, IL | said by digiblur:Yep, I had full intentions of doing that. Their router is ancient and I would be replacing that as well to do some proper QOS rules. Most of the time no more than 2 calls are active though but you always have to plan for the worst.... It sounds like 512kbps upload would probably be just fine. And don't forget, depending on what you decide as a voip solution you might be able to use less bandwidth codecs if needed.
For router alternatives, I've had fantastic results with Mikrotik in environments where voip is mixed with other traffic. They offer solidly built and inexpensive routers that allow you to mark voip packets and prioritize over the other traffic (among many other options).
The downside is an initial learning curve if routeros is new to you, but once setup is extremely reliable in my experience. |
|
 Reviews:
·voip.ms
| reply to digiblur Ditto Trev's commend about ongoing support.
We had a Vonage line in at our church for long distance to supplement a small number of POTS lines. Eventually we removed it because the staff had so much trouble with outages. That's not even a BYOD service, but it speaks to the question of reliability. A simple VOIP setup will not be as reliable as POTS.
Is your staff willing to tolerate this, and do you want them spending their time dealing with phone issues, in order to save some bucks? |
|
 billaustinthey call me Mr. BillPremium,MVM join:2001-10-13 North Las Vegas, NV kudos:3 | One of the Key Factors for any VOIP setup is the internet connection and the router. If setup correctly, VOIP can be just as reliable as a POTS line. I ported four numbers to Anveo earlier this year. So far, I have had no issues with the service. Of course, all the equipment is connected to a large UPS. 
I used to do Vonage installations and service calls. One of the first calls I did, many years ago, was to troubleshoot an issue with poor voice quality. I arrived and found out they were trying to use the Vonage service over a Hughes Satellite connection. In all the calls trying to figure out what was wrong, no one had ever asked for any details about their internet connection.  |
|
 | reply to digiblur 1. carrier: CallCentric - but only port main publicized number 2. for the "rollover" lines, just get new DIDs from CallCentric in your area (cheaper than porting) 3. consider keeping 1 POTS line for fax unless your fax needs are not very serious - if you do not need fax to work 100% every time, then switch fax number to CallCentric (and don't forget that CallCentric can receive faxes and send them as email) 4. you will need an ATA that can handle 1-4 lines depending on what you do - solution: Grandstream HT704 - boom you are done - interconnect into the existing telephones and system 5. just make sure you do in fact have enough bandwidth - however, since you said calls are light usage, may not be an issue - which raises the question - you need 4 lines for light usage? 
please save your church some money and get them onto VOIP
also get their computers off Windows and onto something like Ubuntu Linux, it will reduce their need to churn hardware over for "new" versions of Windows and will reduce IT/antivirus expenses long term
good luck to you and g/d bless |
|
 hokie21 join:2003-06-14 Lake Zurich, IL | I just completed a project for my church which sounds almost identical to what you are considering. I considered going voip, but in the end decided to go with a NEC DSX 40 key system. Phone lines are provided to the church via Comcast and delivered to the key system as POTS. I'm using SIP trunks and Asterisk at home, but just felt doing voip over the Internet would not be reliable enough for a business. I would describe my home voip experience as "cellphone like." Infrequent outages, but enough to potentially be a problem for me as the church "phone guy." The DSX has worked out very well for the church and for me in terms of it being problem free post install. I put in 3 CO lines, a fax line and 6 feature phone stations for about $1200. NEC provides good training and documentation and my wholesale vendor was there to provide post sales technical support, if I had needed any. |
|
 | reply to kaila I am looking for a voip solution too let me know if you find any thing that works. |
|
|
|
 Mangowww.toao.net join:2008-12-25 Alberta kudos:11 | There are many good VoIP solutions. Post your requirements in a new thread and we'll try to help you. |
|
 | reply to digiblur Fully understand the thing with supporting the thing. No ubuntu, don't have that much time for them nor do I want to deal with them not being able to use their programs. But I never really had to deal with many issues, I guess Voicepulse had me spoiled.
I've been around the VoIP block a few times... Packet8, Vonage, Voicepulse(5+ yrs), Broadvoice, Voipo, FWD, and many more. I have a SPA2000, SPA3000 and SPA841 just sitting in the drawer.
Blast from the past: » [Equipment] My solution for in QOS for VOIP » [Sipura] Make your Sipura Speak! - GetSipura Guide
Now back to the thread... yes 4 lines light usage. 2 for the front office for voice. 1 for FAX. The 4th like I stated in the OP, is all the way in the back building not attached to the main church building. It's a food bank type thing some of the days out of the week.
My original thinking was the SPA2000 would run the front two lines or whatever ATA I would get from a provider. The SPA3000 would go in the back if and when I could get internet to it. Then keep the FAX line.
Just working through the numbers as I said I've been out of the VoIP scene for about 4 yrs or so and I'm sure a lot has changed. So any additional recommendations are much appreciated. Thanks for the ones so far, it will give me a start on my research. |
|
 rblizz join:2001-12-16 North Richland Hills, TX Reviews:
·Callcentric
·Charter
| said by digiblur:Now back to the thread... yes 4 lines light usage. 2 for the front office for voice. 1 for FAX. The 4th like I stated in the OP, is all the way in the back building not attached to the main church building. It's a food bank type thing some of the days out of the week.
My original thinking was the SPA2000 would run the front two lines or whatever ATA I would get from a provider. The SPA3000 would go in the back if and when I could get internet to it. Then keep the FAX line. I think it's a good plan. The FAX line could be your backup, should your Internet go down. You might want to delay porting the main number until you know VoIP will work well with your Internet provider and router. |
|
 TrevIP Telephony AddictPremium join:2009-06-29 Victoria, BC kudos:4 | reply to lightspeedpr said by lightspeedpr:I am looking for a voip solution too let me know if you find any thing that works. Unfortunately in Courtenay you're up the creek as far as keeping a local number. The good news is, this should change sometime next summer if things go according to plan. -- Wondering what I do? Find out at »www.digitalcon.ca Get your Obihai ATA in Canada. |
|
 | reply to digiblur Any other recommendations than CallCentric? I spoke with them more about this today and I believe we will start with the main 2 lines first. Makes it pretty simple. Basic features they are looking for are the hunt group/roll over between the two lines, voicemail (doesn't even have to be to email), and that's really about it but I'm sure there are more that come with VoIP.
Most of the calls are incoming, when I asked them about the 1000 outbound with CallCentric they said that would be plenty. I assume that the 1000 minute package with CallCentric was outbound and inbound is unlimited? |
|
 jimkPremium join:2006-04-15 Raleigh, NC Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·voip.ms
| said by digiblur:Any other recommendations than CallCentric? I spoke with them more about this today and I believe we will start with the main 2 lines first. Makes it pretty simple. Basic features they are looking for are the hunt group/roll over between the two lines, voicemail (doesn't even have to be to email), and that's really about it but I'm sure there are more that come with VoIP.
Most of the calls are incoming, when I asked them about the 1000 outbound with CallCentric they said that would be plenty. I assume that the 1000 minute package with CallCentric was outbound and inbound is unlimited? With Callcentric, the incoming and outgoing plans are separate. So if most of your calls are inbound, you could use the Office Unlimited plan for receiving calls and pay as you go (or a pool of minutes if that works out better) for outgoing. |
|
 | said by jimk:With Callcentric, the incoming and outgoing plans are separate. So if most of your calls are inbound, you could use the Office Unlimited plan for receiving calls and pay as you go (or a pool of minutes if that works out better) for outgoing. Oh.. I see. So if I wanted to replace the two lines I would get the 2 lines of Office Unlimited for $8.95 a piece. Then say add a 500 minute outbound for $6.95 then a 1000 outbound for $12.95. Are there any additional taxes and/or 911 fees? |
|
 crazyk4952Premium join:2002-02-04 united state kudos:1 Reviews:
·Charter
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·voip.ms
| said by digiblur:Oh.. I see. So if I wanted to replace the two lines I would get the 2 lines of Office Unlimited for $8.95 a piece. Then say add a 500 minute outbound for $6.95 then a 1000 outbound for $12.95. Are there any additional taxes and/or 911 fees? The only tax that is accessed is on residents of New York (sales tax). E911 is $1.49/month per account. |
|
 PX EliezerPremium join:2008-08-09 Hutt River kudos:13 Reviews:
·callwithus
·voip.ms
·Optimum Voice
·Vitelity VOIP
·Gizmo5
| said by crazyk4952:E911 is $1.49/month per account. No, if the account has a 500 minute or 1,000 minute outbound calling plan, then there is no extra charge for 911.
That's fairly new. |
|