Topic 'Re: HD or HF' in forum '' - dslreports.com

Re: HD or HF

Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:03:09 EDT

johnnn posted : What a horrible mess came from using a closed-architecture chipset (owned by "Ibiquity") to deliver 16-64kbps audio. Device support is terrible, audio quality is unusable, and stations have been terrible stewards of subchannels.

Re: HD or HF

Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:41:51 EDT

djrobx posted :

said by flyingjoey:

I always thought that HD was a term used for something you view, and High Fidelity was for sound. am I wrong here?

HD (Hybrid Digital) radio screwed that all up.
--
AT&T U-Hearse - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011
Rethink Billable.

Re: HD or HF

Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:55:49 EDT

bassjunky posted : Or 3D toothpaste!

»www.crest.com/crest-products/3D-···ste.aspx

Re: HD or HF

Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:17:59 EDT

battleop posted : Polycom has "HD Voice" that sounds good unless you try and use it in a noisy environment.

Re: HD or HF

Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:58:41 EDT

Keefer21 posted : Ive seen ads for HD blenders & HD interior wall paint. its hilarious!

Re: HD or HF

Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:22:08 EDT

mgamer20o0 posted :

said by flyingjoey:

I always thought that HD was a term used for something you view, and High Fidelity was for sound. am I wrong here?

they will slap on hd on anything they can lol they have hd radio wh not hd voice.

HD or HF

Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:57:01 EDT

flyingjoey posted : I always thought that HD was a term used for something you view, and High Fidelity was for sound. am I wrong here?